Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
How bad is it going to hurt when he loses by tens of millions of votes? AND THEN Hillary gets to pick with a new democratic senate
You guys have predicted Trumps demise since last Summer and he only continues to grow stronger, even after a $40 million dollar negative ad blitz from all angles.
Bork was blocked but Reagan's next nominee (Kennedy) was approved 97-0. Democrats didn't have an agenda to block ALL Reagan nominees. Bork was blocked based on his track record.
Obama still isn't getting a 3rd justice, no matter how many foot-stomping posts are written about it on C-D. But keep going, it is certainly highly entertaining.
What would be even MORE entertaining would be for the Pubs to block Garland, then lose both the presidential election along with control of the senate. And that's VERY likely.
Talk about shooting themselves in the feet!
Then president Hill will appoint a lib who will sail through confirmation in a Dem senate.
How bad is it going to hurt when he loses by tens of millions of votes? AND THEN Hillary gets to pick with a new democratic senate
Well then, you should not care if the Senate waits until the new President is sworn in, right? After all, you could potentially get a far more liberal judge so why oppose the Senate's actions?
What would be even MORE entertaining would be for the Pubs to block Garland, then lose both the presidential election along with control of the senate. And that's VERY likely.
Talk about shooting themselves in the feet!
Then president Hill will appoint a lib who will sail through confirmation in a Dem senate.
Entertainment?
You bet!
The Republicans will still have 40+ Senators to filibuster the LWNJ that a President Hillary would nominate. Try again though!
Well then, you should not care if the Senate waits until the new President is sworn in, right? After all, you could potentially get a far more liberal judge so why oppose the Senate's actions?
Great point, why all the fuss? You Dems will get a much better pick after Hillary is elected, right? (Haaaa!)
The Republicans will still have 40+ Senators to filibuster the LWNJ that a President Hillary would nominate. Try again though!
We'll see how long that would last. Because no doubt something would come up in the senate that the Pubs would want desperately to move on. They'd have to pull that filibuster to get it.
We'll see how long that would last. Because no doubt something would come up in the senate that the Pubs would want desperately to move on. They'd have to pull that filibuster to get it.
That's how it works.
If the Democrats wish to shut down the government yet again, that's their call and they will pay the political price for it.
The Republicans will still have 40+ Senators to filibuster the LWNJ that a President Hillary would nominate. Try again though!
Republican Senators and Congressmen should not be allowed to vote on anything until after they are re-elected in November - it's not fair to have lame-duck Senators voting on important issues.
If the Democrats wish to shut down the government yet again, that's their call and they will pay the political price for it.
That's crazy talk.
Everyone but you knows who shut down the gummint each and every time.
<hint> Not the Dems.
Anyway, stop deflecting. This is about the supreme court nominee. Pubs better move very carefully or it'll come back to bite 'em hard. Of course, they haven't shown any sings of intelligence in years.
At least we aren't hearing about a Harriet Myers fiasco.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.