Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-13-2016, 09:00 AM
 
9,613 posts, read 6,954,578 times
Reputation: 6842

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
Persons tat have had their sexual organs changed should use the restrooms with the appropriate plumbing. Even male restrooms with the wall of urinals have some privacy and female restrooms have individual cubicles. If privacy is the main concern the male restrooms could simply make the partitions between the urinals larger.

Note- people that have these operations have considered themselves to be the sex they were changed to accommodate. One could consider that female oriented men transgendered into females have been using male restrooms most of their lives. Male oriented females have been doing the same.

I think this debate is an attempt by the conservative religious right to force their views that transgender operations are almost as evil as abortion and should be prevented, along with any legal accommodation, by the force of government. My opinion is if your religious beliefs consider a particular act evil then do not do that act yourself. Do not try to use law to force the rest of us to go along with your beliefs.
There's nothing religious about this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-13-2016, 09:04 AM
 
4,040 posts, read 2,558,126 times
Reputation: 4010
Quote:
Originally Posted by katygirl68 View Post
Conservatives didn't start this, so you're wrong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziggy100 View Post
There's nothing religious about this.

Some people are so lost, they are willing to circumvent reality if they can see a way to blame the "religious right".

The good news is when you see such a foolish leap of logic, you can write off that person's opinion for the remainder of the discussion as they are obviously delusional.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2016, 09:05 AM
 
27,154 posts, read 15,330,669 times
Reputation: 12075
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike0618 View Post
A few points


1. Transgenders are not the problem. Perverts and rapists using this as a way to be to their pray easier is the issue.

2. Bathrooms alone are not the problem, there are stalls and Transgenders will use those like they always have. Who will know? A transgender isn't using a urinal in a men's bathroom anyways.

3. The problem is locker rooms where men walk around nude and the showers. I assume women do the same. I might have to be a women today and check to make sure��.

4. Bathrooms in locker rooms are problematic. I.e. point 1 and 3.

5. A 6 ft 5 lady called into spkandlish's radio show today. She is a biological women truck driver who now is treated as a leper in the ladies room because some think she is a man. What happens if violence comes to her because of this or the law gets called on her? Does she need to show the goods to prove she is a women?

We have gone down the rabbit hole. Don't ask don't tell has been the unwritten rule forever on this issue. It should have stayed that way.



Changing the privacy of the 99+ % is a problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2016, 09:06 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,059 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
Persons tat have had their sexual organs changed should use the restrooms with the appropriate plumbing. Even male restrooms with the wall of urinals have some privacy and female restrooms have individual cubicles. If privacy is the main concern the male restrooms could simply make the partitions between the urinals larger.

Note- people that have these operations have considered themselves to be the sex they were changed to accommodate. One could consider that female oriented men transgendered into females have been using male restrooms most of their lives. Male oriented females have been doing the same.

I think this debate is an attempt by the conservative religious right to force their views that transgender operations are almost as evil as abortion and should be prevented, along with any legal accommodation, by the force of government. My opinion is if your religious beliefs consider a particular act evil then do not do that act yourself. Do not try to use law to force the rest of us to go along with your beliefs.
You're missing the point. The Obama edict applies to transgenders who have not yet completed sex reassignment surgery, so what this does is allows those with penises into girls'/women's multiple occupancy restrooms/changing/locker/shower rooms, and vice versa.

And there's also no definitive identification of who is or who is not transgender. What's the criteria to identify someone as such? Merely someone's "say so" about themselves? And who is monitoring access to facilities to make sure that only those who actually ARE transgender are admitted to the facilities?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2016, 09:07 AM
 
4,040 posts, read 2,558,126 times
Reputation: 4010
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluesjuke View Post
Changing the privacy of the 99+ % is a problem.
What?

How dare you mention privacy rights??

You MUST be a bigot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2016, 09:08 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts & Hilton Head, SC
10,029 posts, read 15,679,858 times
Reputation: 8679
Anybody know the legal definition of a transgender? Has there been any laws passed regarding such?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2016, 09:10 AM
 
27,154 posts, read 15,330,669 times
Reputation: 12075
Just wait a moment and DC will dictate one to us from the WH.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2016, 09:12 AM
 
4,040 posts, read 2,558,126 times
Reputation: 4010
What ever happened to the old adage "You can't please everybody all of the time"?

Here we are saying to the 99.5% of the population "Tough **** if you feel uncomfortable, we are going to please the .05%".

If you're 12 year old daughter has a problem getting changed for the pool while standing next to a penis, then obviously you have raised her to be intolerant and bigoted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2016, 09:32 AM
 
11,186 posts, read 6,511,514 times
Reputation: 4622
Quote:
Originally Posted by katygirl68 View Post
It's just so unfair. Next thing you know, transgenders will be allowed in the Olympics and women will never be able to compete.
The Olympics has strict rules before letting a male compete as a female. It's not as though a male can simply declare himself as identifying as female and compete against women.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2016, 09:34 AM
 
4,040 posts, read 2,558,126 times
Reputation: 4010
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzarama View Post
The Olympics has strict rules before letting a male compete as a female. It's not as though a male can simply declare himself as identifying as female and compete against women.
You might want to double check that.


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/26/sp...-ioc.html?_r=0
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top