Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Unless you hit them IN the heart, they will continue on for some time. It is actually a MYTH that a bullet will knock you off your feet, as was proved by the Moro tribesmen...who continued to kill American soldiers AFTER they had been shot.
it will knock you back, not talking about making you fly back. The reason why the firearm is the weapon of choice in these situations is because of their stoping power. If they did not stop someone, they would not be used much. The reason why law enforcement use the hollow point rounds is the same, it Will stop someone, a ballooning bullet is not going to travel in a straight line, when it hits bone, some will fragment and change direction. it will stop you.
Unless you hit them IN the heart, they will continue on for some time. It is actually a MYTH that a bullet will knock you off your feet, as was proved by the Moro tribesmen...who continued to kill American soldiers AFTER they had been shot.
Wow... if a bullet can knock a bear off it's feet, do you really believe there isn't one that can do the same for humans?
We are getting off-course here and I will cease and desist, but I am constantly astounded at the certainty of some people who have, in all likeliehood, never shot a gun or killed a game animal.
And, you would prefer those restrictions to be similar to the Districts - that much is very clear.
Actually I've said numerous time, as you know but choose to lie about, I'm quite happy to let other jurisdiction set their own gun laws. The suicide rate is sky high in AZ, but I'm all in favor of letting the people of that state work it out.
Wow... if a bullet can knock a bear off it's feet, do you really believe there isn't one that can do the same for humans?
We are getting off-course here and I will cease and desist, but I am constantly astounded at the certainty of some people who have, in all likeliehood, never shot a gun or killed a game animal.
most of these arounds have a mid 90% stopping power with ONE HIT. People that are being attacked will typically use more than one round to stop an enemy.
Does the right to keep and bear arms exist if a militia is no longer necessary for the security of a free state?
a militia is always necessary for the security of a free state. it is not just foreign states that can pose a threat to a free state, but from internal sources as well. Our founding fathers have spoken on this in detail, which you can find quotes and links to the quotes within this discussion.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Mythbusters busted it...then it MUST be a myth LOL!