Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-21-2016, 08:33 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,363 posts, read 26,285,929 times
Reputation: 15679

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DerpyDerp View Post
And yet they've had several recent shootings that have killed far more than the worst shooting in America (Orlando.)
Yes they had a number of shootings in the last year but it doesn't come close in comparison to the US, if they had loose gun laws like ours it would be far worse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-21-2016, 08:35 AM
 
19,669 posts, read 12,260,591 times
Reputation: 26481
There are some significantly rural areas in Mass., people tend to forget this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2016, 08:37 AM
 
3,216 posts, read 2,087,761 times
Reputation: 1863
Quote:
Originally Posted by scarabchuck View Post
I find it odd that the NRA is silent on this...
Are they?

"Yesterday, Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey announced that she wants to further restrict the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding Massachusetts citizens by arbitrarily changing the way her office enforces the state’s existing “assault weapons” ban. Massachusetts state law currently prohibits the possession of “assault weapons” and large capacity feeding devices (defined as devices capable of holding certain amounts of ammunition) and “copies or duplicates of the weapons.” This law mirrors the federal “assault weapons” ban that expired in 2004.
Attorney General Healey claims that gun manufacturers across the state have been selling firearms to citizens that they claim are compliant with the law, but that she says would be considered “copies or duplicates” of the “assault weapons” prohibited for possession under Massachusetts law.
By doing so, Attorney General Healey has over stepped her boundaries as Attorney General and created a new definition outside of the statute that currently regulates so-called “assault weapons” in Massachusetts. This new definition could lead to a total ban of all semi-automatic firearms in the state.
Your NRA-ILA will be working tirelessly to protect the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding gun owners in Massachusetts by looking into the legal options available to fight this egregious attack."

https://www.nraila.org/articles/2016...endment-rights
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2016, 08:38 AM
 
29,548 posts, read 14,701,405 times
Reputation: 14483
Quote:
Originally Posted by DerpyDerp View Post
Likewise. I never had much love for the NRA, but every time the president starts talking about gun control I write them another renewal check.

I had let my membership laps a few years ago. Now I think I'm going to sign up to be a lifetime member. Also time to add to the collection....damn, I'm going to need another safe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2016, 08:39 AM
 
29,548 posts, read 14,701,405 times
Reputation: 14483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlandochuck1 View Post
Are they?

"Yesterday, Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey announced that she wants to further restrict the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding Massachusetts citizens by arbitrarily changing the way her office enforces the state’s existing “assault weapons” ban. Massachusetts state law currently prohibits the possession of “assault weapons” and large capacity feeding devices (defined as devices capable of holding certain amounts of ammunition) and “copies or duplicates of the weapons.” This law mirrors the federal “assault weapons” ban that expired in 2004.
Attorney General Healey claims that gun manufacturers across the state have been selling firearms to citizens that they claim are compliant with the law, but that she says would be considered “copies or duplicates” of the “assault weapons” prohibited for possession under Massachusetts law.
By doing so, Attorney General Healey has over stepped her boundaries as Attorney General and created a new definition outside of the statute that currently regulates so-called “assault weapons” in Massachusetts. This new definition could lead to a total ban of all semi-automatic firearms in the state.
Your NRA-ILA will be working tirelessly to protect the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding gun owners in Massachusetts by looking into the legal options available to fight this egregious attack."

https://www.nraila.org/articles/2016...endment-rights
Thanks for that link ! As of last night I had not heard anything. Glad to see they are trying to right this violation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2016, 08:39 AM
 
1,448 posts, read 1,189,179 times
Reputation: 1268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Yes they had a number of shootings in the last year but it doesn't come close in comparison to the US
And, of course, the vast majority of America's gun crimes are committed by gang members, drug dealers and street criminals - not members of the NRA, licensed handgun carriers nor AR15s, but the incessant wave of new legislation addresses the latter and not the former every single time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2016, 08:44 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,363 posts, read 26,285,929 times
Reputation: 15679
Quote:
Originally Posted by swilliamsny View Post
No, 75% of Americans are not in favor of "assault weapon" bans. To quote another BOGUS stat, 90% of Americans don't favor universal background checks, either. I never cared much for the NRA, but during the recent (three or four years) push for gun control, I decided to join up, and belong to about five groups now, including that dreadful NRA. Keep pushing, people. It's having the complete opposite effect you're hoping for.

Governor Cuomo is probably livid right now that Massachusetts one-upped him. Just got word that someone travelling through NY for a job in NH paused at a rest stop and was arrested for having an "assault weapon" with him. Crazy, that you can't even stop while travelling in NY without breaking the assinine laws.
The polls in favor of an AWB was around 50%.
Poll taken back in December had 89 percent favor background checks.
Probably right about Cuomo, the SAFE act only required registration of assault weapons.

Quinnipiac University poll, conducted Dec. 16-20: "Would you support or oppose a law requiring background checks on people buying guns at gun shows or online?" Support: 89 percent. Oppose: 9 percent. Unsure/No answer: 1 percent.


Laura Ingraham wrongly says claim that 90% support for gun background checks has been debunked | PunditFact
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2016, 08:47 AM
 
Location: louisville
4,754 posts, read 2,743,571 times
Reputation: 1721
The AG's explanation, and exceeding of authority, are appalling.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2016, 08:48 AM
 
Location: louisville
4,754 posts, read 2,743,571 times
Reputation: 1721
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
The polls in favor of an AWB was around 50%.
Poll taken back in December had 89 percent favor background checks.
Probably right about Cuomo, the SAFE act only required registration of assault weapons.

Quinnipiac University poll, conducted Dec. 16-20: "Would you support or oppose a law requiring background checks on people buying guns at gun shows or online?" Support: 89 percent. Oppose: 9 percent. Unsure/No answer: 1 percent.


Laura Ingraham wrongly says claim that 90% support for gun background checks has been debunked | PunditFact

Good... then have an amendment passed. Want to infringe a right, do it the legal way: amendment.

See what polls mean then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2016, 08:52 AM
 
29,548 posts, read 14,701,405 times
Reputation: 14483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
The polls in favor of an AWB was around 50%.
Poll taken back in December had 89 percent favor background checks.
Probably right about Cuomo, the SAFE act only required registration of assault weapons.

Quinnipiac University poll, conducted Dec. 16-20: "Would you support or oppose a law requiring background checks on people buying guns at gun shows or online?" Support: 89 percent. Oppose: 9 percent. Unsure/No answer: 1 percent.


Laura Ingraham wrongly says claim that 90% support for gun background checks has been debunked | PunditFact

Again, what is an assault weapon ? Any semi-auto mag fed rifle and or shotgun ? Or just black ones ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top