Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
She has a whole history of lying and ethical problems going back to being fired from the Watergate committee for unethical behavior.
Pay to play is evident with her as SOS at this point.
Hillary was NOT fired from the Watergate Committee. She did not work for Jerry Zeifman, who is responsible for this tale, and he had no authority to fire her. Hillary remained on the Watergate Committee until Richard Nixon resigned and the Committee shut down.
FBI can only detain for questioning in an investigation. They have no authority to issue a warrant. That would have to come from Loretta Lynch. Do you see that happening, even if Hillary is connected to MURDER? I don't.
Royalty will not ever do the perp walk.
Hillary was NOT fired from the Watergate Committee. She did not work for Jerry Zeifman, who is responsible for this tale, and he had no authority to fire her. Hillary remained on the Watergate Committee until Richard Nixon resigned and the Committee shut down.
She was fired after the Nixon Watergate deal and refused a letter of recommendation!
Zeifman asserts that Rodham joined Burke Marshall, Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair and Rodham’s former law professor; special counsel John Doar; and senior associate special counsel (and future Clinton White House counsel) Bernard Nussbaum in trying to gain enough votes on the Judiciary Committee to change House rules and deny counsel to Nixon.
In order to pull this off, Zeifman said that Rodham wrote a fraudulent legal brief, and confiscated public documents.
After the Nixon impeachment investigation was finished, Zeifman fired Rodham and said he refused to give her a letter of recommendation.
According to the Calabrese column as reported by TruthOrFiction.com, Zeifman said he regrets not reporting Rodham to the appropriate bar association.
That doesn’t mean it couldn’t be true, but it makes it difficult to arrive at the truth.
Some folks on the republican side are amusing: they are hopping for devine intervention in the last min. Maybe she is sick, maybe she will be indicted for Benghazi, maybe for the Clinton foundation, Lord, give us something...anything...
The simple truth that they could prepare and nominate a worhy candidate (that could smash democrats in November), does not get in their mind. Had 4 years to prepare, but wasted them dealing with nonsense like Obama's birthplace. At the end, they nominated Trump and are now expecting miracles.
And you can blame others all you want, I guess, if you prefer to ignore the in your face evidence from multiple sources.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge
In your face innuendo, you mean.
I could suggest that you are a Putin plant that the Russians have placed on this board, to persuade people to vote for their candidate, Trump, and if you denied it, I could point to all the evidence. Look how many anti-Clinton things you've said. That's the same kind of evidence you are citing.
No, there is good reason to highly suspect Hillary Clinton and none to buy into your analogy.
Then nobody should have a problem with an independent special prosecutor.
If she is innocent, and c'mon you don't really believe that, then this would exonerate her and the issue would finally be put to rest.
Right now there is an appearance of impropriety, the Clintons should have divorced themselves from the orgainization while she was secretary of state but there is nothing.
So they appoint a special prosecutor and she's exonerated, what then. People wanted Comey making the final decision on Email I, did it go away? Suddenly Comey who is one of the most respected government officials is suddenly corrupt. Besides that it would last several months.
Some folks on the republican side are amusing: they are hopping for devine intervention in the last min. Maybe she is sick, maybe she will be indicted for Benghazi, maybe for the Clinton foundation, Lord, give us something...anything...
The simple truth that they could prepare and nominate a worhy candidate (that could smash democrats in November), does not get in their mind. Had 4 years to prepare, but wasted them dealing with nonsense like Obama's birthplace. At the end, they nominated Trump and are now expecting miracles.
I think it's completely fair to ridicule the GOP for picking Trump.
However, it's reprehensible that Dems stand behind Hillary. They are essentially saying, "we will vote for ANYONE with that D."
Status:
"Smartened up and walked away!"
(set 28 days ago)
11,792 posts, read 5,798,330 times
Reputation: 14221
Quote:
Originally Posted by oberon_1
Some folks on the republican side are amusing: they are hopping for devine intervention in the last min. Maybe she is sick, maybe she will be indicted for Benghazi, maybe for the Clinton foundation, Lord, give us something...anything...
The simple truth that they could prepare and nominate a worhy candidate (that could smash democrats in November), does not get in their mind. Had 4 years to prepare, but wasted them dealing with nonsense like Obama's birthplace. At the end, they nominated Trump and are now expecting miracles.
Problem is - not all of us that see what's going on are Republican - but the dems always think that everyone drinks the Kool Aid and loves it!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
