Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-30-2016, 04:56 PM
 
Location: Floribama
18,949 posts, read 43,621,102 times
Reputation: 18760

Advertisements

It's funny watching his sidekick Dean Young get all worked up over this.


Drag Queen Leads Charge Against Judge Roy Moore
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-30-2016, 04:57 PM
 
19,966 posts, read 7,876,419 times
Reputation: 6556
Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilEyeFleegle View Post
It would appear that most 'Liberal' judges are too smart to rule directly contrary to the precedents set by the higher courts.
Again, this is how our system works--judges make rulings everyday that they don't like..or that they don't agree with--but it's their job..and the overwhelming majority do it well.
That's bogus. Liberal judges were ruling against popular vote, legislatures and precedents all the time with the gay marriage rulings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2016, 05:11 PM
 
Location: University City, Philadelphia
22,632 posts, read 14,945,990 times
Reputation: 15935
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
The Feds have no authority.... He isn't a Federal Judge.
This isn't reconstruction, with carpetbagging.


The second time... pft! he never left the 1st time. Nor will he this time. The feds have no power over a State Justice.
The problem lies in the State Constitution. Not this Judge that refuses to do jack, without amending the State Constitution.
It isn't the "Feds" that suspended Moore.

----------------------------------------

Oops ... I'm sorry ... I should have read ALL the responses to this post; so I'm just merely echoing what others have proved to be correct.

Why can't we just move on? Don't make some bogus claim Moore was right ... he was clearly wrong; no one reading this City-Data thread is a distinguished judge and scholar on US Constitutional Law making a profound case in support of Moore's conduct.

Last edited by Clark Park; 09-30-2016 at 05:21 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2016, 05:25 PM
 
Location: University City, Philadelphia
22,632 posts, read 14,945,990 times
Reputation: 15935
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtl1 View Post
That's bogus. Liberal judges were ruling against popular vote, legislatures and precedents all the time with the gay marriage rulings.
Judges are not bound by popular votes. The US system of justice often rules against popular opinion. We do not live in an absolute democracy; this country is a constitutional republic. Minorities are protected from the tyranny of the majority; the US Constitution separates religion from government policy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2016, 05:30 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,310 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15647
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtl1 View Post
Notice how whites and conservative can be fired or removed from any position? Just try to get a liberal judge removed.
Maybe you have an example of a judge ignoring federal law and not being removed???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2016, 05:37 PM
 
19,966 posts, read 7,876,419 times
Reputation: 6556
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Maybe you have an example of a judge ignoring federal law and not being removed???
Judges do it all the time and even rewrite federal and state law like they did with gay marriage.

Here's another example:

Judge Ignores Federal Law and Allows Sandy Hook Gun Case to Proceed

Quote:
The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act was passed by Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush to stop these types of emotionally-charged lawsuits against gun manufacturers. Codified at 15 U.S.C. §7901-7903, the Congressional “Findings” specifically state that businesses that manufacture, market, distribute, import or sell firearms should not “be liable for the harm caused by those who criminally or unlawfully misuse” such weapons. Such civil liability lawsuits “may not be brought in any Federal or State court.”
Yet in an 18-page opinion, Judge Bellis engages in what Justice Antonin Scalia would have called an embarrassing “bit of interpretive jiggery-pokery” in order to get out of doing what the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act compels her to do – dismiss this lawsuit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2016, 05:38 PM
 
19,966 posts, read 7,876,419 times
Reputation: 6556
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clark Park View Post
Judges are not bound by popular votes. The US system of justice often rules against popular opinion. We do not live in an absolute democracy; this country is a constitutional republic. Minorities are protected from the tyranny of the majority; the US Constitution separates religion from government policy.
No we just live in a tyranny of the minority and liberal judges.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2016, 05:39 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,310 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15647
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtl1 View Post
Judges do it all the time and even rewrite federal and state law like they did with gay marriage.

Here's another example:

Judge Ignores Federal Law and Allows Sandy Hook Gun Case to Proceed
That's not an example of a judge defying federal law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2016, 05:42 PM
 
19,966 posts, read 7,876,419 times
Reputation: 6556
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
That's not an example of a judge defying federal law.
Next a liberal pees on your leg and tells you it's raining.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2016, 05:51 PM
 
Location: Twin Falls Idaho
4,996 posts, read 2,445,794 times
Reputation: 2540
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtl1 View Post
That's bogus. Liberal judges were ruling against popular vote, legislatures and precedents all the time with the gay marriage rulings.

Sure...Liberal Appellate judges---Liberal Supreme Court judges. They were breaking new ground. It is how law and precedent work. Conservative judges have done the same.

This particular Judge acted improperly when he issued a court order directly defying a higher court ruling..that is illegal and the very definition of 'Malfeasance'.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:09 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top