Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Trying to think of a time since the introduction of modern scientific reasoning when 97% of scientists in the relevant field of research all agree on something that ended up being completely the opposite of what was actually going on.
Coming up blank, so I will side with the scientists that spend their life researching the topic as their full time jobs rather than random ass people on internet message boards linking to conspiracy web sites. I think deniers are from the same subset of people that believe Noah's ark was an accurate historical description of something that really happened.
Trying to think of a time since the introduction of modern scientific reasoning when 97% of scientists in the relevant field of research all agree on something that ended up being completely the opposite of what was actually going on.
Coming up blank, so I will side with the scientists that spend their life researching the topic as their full time jobs rather than random ass people on internet message boards linking to conspiracy web sites. I think deniers are from the same subset of people that believe Noah's ark was an accurate historical description of something that really happened.
Out of curiosity, do you think they polled all scientists to arrive at that 97%?
...and where I live, we have experienced ten years or more, without ever hitting the 100 degree F mark. It's called weather, manipulated by trade winds, ocean tides, etc...
Yes, it means you don't have enough data to form an accurate conclusion given the extended length of the earth's naturally occurring climate change cycles.
Not to mention every time they make their climate computer models, history and time have always proven them to be wrong.
Trying to think of a time since the introduction of modern scientific reasoning when 97% of scientists in the relevant field of research all agree on something that ended up being completely the opposite of what was actually going on.
Coming up blank, so I will side with the scientists that spend their life researching the topic as their full time jobs rather than random ass people on internet message boards linking to conspiracy web sites. I think deniers are from the same subset of people that believe Noah's ark was an accurate historical description of something that really happened.
The liberal, wack-a-doodle consensus also said Hilary was going to win the presidency, guess they were wrong there to as well.
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,646,508 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger
BTW, the entire Midwest was cool, lacked severe weather and had plenty of rainfall once again. The last hot summer we had was 1988
That's false and you know it, try summers of 95, 99, 02, 06, 10, 12 and this summer was very hot in the midwest
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
