Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-21-2016, 10:59 PM
 
5,719 posts, read 6,447,937 times
Reputation: 3647

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by juppiter View Post
Hillary pledged to give half of cabinet posts to women.

But her voice was too annoying or something for the idiots in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin (Ohio, we already knew you were stupid.)

She still won the popular vote by 1.7 million, despite what the worthless, pathetic, uneducated individuals in those three states decided.

I say democrats focus on the south next election. **** the Midwest. I hope they rise to 20% unemployment under trump. And food stamps and Medicaid will be cut so they will just be screwed.

We as democrats need to say we do not want the Midwest and their racism back. We want the new south in our coalition. We turned Virginia blue. Now we want North Carolina, Georgia, and Texas. States with potential. Not dying pathetic Midwestern states. They can **** off.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-21-2016, 11:27 PM
 
Location: Meggett, SC
11,011 posts, read 11,024,526 times
Reputation: 6192
Quote:
Originally Posted by juppiter View Post
She still won the popular vote by 1.7 million, despite what the worthless, pathetic, uneducated individuals in those three states decided.

I say democrats focus on the south next election. **** the Midwest. I hope they rise to 20% unemployment under trump. And food stamps and Medicaid will be cut so they will just be screwed.

We as democrats need to say we do not want the Midwest and their racism back. We want the new south in our coalition. We turned Virginia blue. Now we want North Carolina, Georgia, and Texas. States with potential. Not dying pathetic Midwestern states. They can **** off.
You should see if they'll have that as the next Democrat campaign platform. Let me know how that works out for you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2016, 12:24 AM
 
10,829 posts, read 5,436,622 times
Reputation: 4710
Quote:
Originally Posted by juppiter View Post
She still won the popular vote by 1.7 million, despite what the worthless, pathetic, uneducated individuals in those three states decided.

I say democrats focus on the south next election. **** the Midwest. I hope they rise to 20% unemployment under trump. And food stamps and Medicaid will be cut so they will just be screwed.

We as democrats need to say we do not want the Midwest and their racism back. We want the new south in our coalition. We turned Virginia blue. Now we want North Carolina, Georgia, and Texas. States with potential. Not dying pathetic Midwestern states. They can **** off.
Well, with your attitude, I'm sure you'll be winning lots of elections!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2016, 12:27 AM
 
10,829 posts, read 5,436,622 times
Reputation: 4710
Trump should select candidates based on their competence and willingness to carry out his policies. Period.

We've already selected leaders based on race.

Namely, Obama the failure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2016, 12:29 AM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,636,949 times
Reputation: 9676
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamies View Post
I hope this isn't the way it appears. But I have yet to hear of anyone but old, fat, white, religious extremist, anti glbt, racist men being proposed for leadership in the Trump administration.

Not one woman, no blacks, no gays? Not even a hint of a moderate White House.

Did we just vote Hitler and the Third Riche into power? I'm pretty sure that's about how the nazis started, with good intentions.
Surely, Trump supporters can justify why such people shouldn't be in there. But one woman Trump is considering is Gov. Mary Fallin of Oklahoma. She is not very popular in Oklahoma, due in parat to her wanting to add state sales taxes on services, such as haircuts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2016, 12:30 AM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,636,949 times
Reputation: 9676
Quote:
Originally Posted by red baron View Post
Sarah Palin, great choice.
Surely, you jest!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2016, 04:24 AM
 
26,497 posts, read 15,074,947 times
Reputation: 14644
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Excuse me, but all I said is that Trump isn't comfortable with minorities. I didn't say that he was a bad man because of it. I didn't say that non whites should be in his cabinet. I made it clear that he's under no obligation to associate with blacks or anyone else, and that his cabinet should be stocked with the people he trusts.

So get off my ass.
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Nonsense.

What blacks has Trump ever been associated with? None.

And no, Omarosa doesn't count.
You said Omarosa doesn't count as a black person being associated with Trump.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2016, 04:34 AM
 
2,842 posts, read 2,328,628 times
Reputation: 3386
Quote:
Originally Posted by claymoore View Post
People like the person who started this thread don't believe in selecting people on character and ability.

Nope, skin pigmentation and sexual preference is what matters.

Of course, hypocrites like this wouldn't live very long if they were forced to pick a surgeon in a time of emergency for themselves .. based on the same standards!

Agreed. These decisions should be merit based. I couldn't care less what the race, gender or sexual orientation of a person is, but they need to be qualified to do the job. I can't believe anyone with a brain would want a less qualified appointee simply because they are "diverse."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2016, 04:37 AM
 
2,842 posts, read 2,328,628 times
Reputation: 3386
Quote:
Originally Posted by juppiter View Post
She still won the popular vote by 1.7 million, despite what the worthless, pathetic, uneducated individuals in those three states decided.

I say democrats focus on the south next election. **** the Midwest. I hope they rise to 20% unemployment under trump. And food stamps and Medicaid will be cut so they will just be screwed.

We as democrats need to say we do not want the Midwest and their racism back. We want the new south in our coalition. We turned Virginia blue. Now we want North Carolina, Georgia, and Texas. States with potential. Not dying pathetic Midwestern states. They can **** off.
Well... that's very "progressive" of you. Rather than hoping for the success of your fellow Americans you want 1 out of 5 people to not be employed and go hungry. And then you wonder why we are all sick and tired of the far left...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2016, 05:43 AM
 
Location: FIN
888 posts, read 1,591,757 times
Reputation: 811
Quote:
Originally Posted by juppiter View Post
She still won the popular vote by 1.7 million, despite what the worthless, pathetic, uneducated individuals in those three states decided.

I say democrats focus on the south next election. **** the Midwest. I hope they rise to 20% unemployment under trump. And food stamps and Medicaid will be cut so they will just be screwed.

We as democrats need to say we do not want the Midwest and their racism back. We want the new south in our coalition. We turned Virginia blue. Now we want North Carolina, Georgia, and Texas. States with potential. Not dying pathetic Midwestern states. They can **** off.
I beg you apply for a campaign manager spot with the Democrats. With your attitude, Republicans would be winning forever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:57 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top