Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-02-2017, 12:29 PM
 
Location: Laguna Niguel, Orange County CA
9,807 posts, read 11,187,117 times
Reputation: 7997

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by expatCA View Post
Nor to the Dems and Republicans who watch them. Porn makes more money than normal films.
This.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-02-2017, 12:30 PM
 
Location: Laguna Niguel, Orange County CA
9,807 posts, read 11,187,117 times
Reputation: 7997
Quote:
Originally Posted by jm1982 View Post
I'm talking about illegals . I don't care what's in the best interest of illegals or criminals .
But your mayor does.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2017, 12:42 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles (Native)
25,303 posts, read 21,538,634 times
Reputation: 12319
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuvSouthOC View Post
But your mayor does.
Yes unfortunately . Hopefully he doesn't get reelected but knowing how clueless many are in L.A he probably will
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2017, 01:26 PM
 
47,046 posts, read 26,139,235 times
Reputation: 29522
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dark Enlightenment View Post
I imagine the most common way underage prostitutes get help from the system is by being picked up by police and then referred to social services.
And with the change in legislation, the child in question is no longer at risk of being charged with a crime when encountering law enforcement. Can you imagine that being an improvement?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2017, 01:28 PM
 
47,046 posts, read 26,139,235 times
Reputation: 29522
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dark Enlightenment View Post
I wouldn't be surprised. It would seem to fit with the feminist agenda - define all prostitutes as victims, with penalties reserved only for the men involved.
Ah, the mask slips. It's somehow unfair to the johns that we're not locking up child prostitutes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2017, 01:31 PM
 
47,046 posts, read 26,139,235 times
Reputation: 29522
Quote:
Originally Posted by jm1982 View Post
Many Libs live in a fantasy world though and are detached from reality.
There's an ironic thing to put in a thread headlined "Child Prostitution Legalized by California Democrats".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2017, 01:34 PM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,300 posts, read 108,407,525 times
Reputation: 116335
Quote:
Originally Posted by justinbro2002 View Post
Not treating minors who are most likely victims of sex trafficking as criminals is not the same thing as legalizing child prostitution not even if someone wants to try and spin it as such.
This. OP, your news source is a Repub propaganda source that puts a right-wing spin on everything, it's obvious from the article, which rants about a lot more than the child prostitution issue. I imagine the measure is designed to decriminalize exploited children, which makes sense. It doesn't protect them from being picked up by cops and questioned.

From the criminal code, linked in an earlier post:

A commercially exploited child under this paragraph may be adjudged a dependent child of the court pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 300 of the Welfare and Institutions Code and may be taken into temporary custody pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 305 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, if the conditions allowing temporary custody without warrant are met.

Amazing what a difference it makes to fill out the picture and get all the facts, isn't it?


Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2017, 01:36 PM
 
193 posts, read 170,059 times
Reputation: 258
They AREN'T prostitute. They are kids AND you shouldn't have sex with them. Republicans, I'm looking at YOU.

Here's a huge list of convicted Republican Child Sex offenders. Funny how they didn't make it on the Conservative controlled media.
Republican List
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2017, 01:38 PM
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,625 posts, read 16,635,080 times
Reputation: 6075
Quote:
Originally Posted by jm1982 View Post
What source can't be viewed as biased these days though.

Here it is from L.A Times which is a very liberal source.

"Children can no longer be charged with prostitution, given the high incidence of human trafficking of people younger than 18. Adults who perform or solicit prostitution would not face mandatory minimum sentences. "

How will California’s 2017 laws affect you? - Los Angeles Times
This is the hyperlink to the bold

Quote:
Senate Bill 1322, authored by Sen. Holly Mitchell (D-Los Angeles), make the crimes of solicitation and loitering with intent to commit prostitution misdemeanors inapplicable to children younger than 18. It also allows law enforcement to take sexually exploited children into temporary custody -- only if leaving them unattended would pose an immediate threat to their health or safety.
California decriminalizes prostitution for minors after Gov. Jerry Brown signs bills to aid trafficking victims - LA Times


Nothing in the article states that those who frequent Prostitutes are let off the hook.

the Adult part is about victims who are now over 18 serving time for what they did when they were kids.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2017, 01:49 PM
 
16,742 posts, read 8,725,868 times
Reputation: 19568
Quote:
Originally Posted by don1945 View Post
Because their leader has started a trend. All he has to do is say " I hear...." and it becomes fact. That, and the fact they look for anything they can to jump on the other team.
How about the fact that the MSM has had such a liberal bias in the way they frame the news, people of all political stripes have sought other sources (some very good, others very bad) to find news?

When big stories (that would have been covered if it was a (R) politician/policy) are ignored because they would be unfavorable to (D's), then people feel as if the once respected places (CBS, NBC, ABC, NYT, etc.) no longer provide news. Instead it is propaganda or by omission, fake news.

Lastly, how does if feel to get a dose of your own medicine. I remember when Bush was in office, a large % of liberals were "looking for anything they could find to jump on the other team".
Or didn't you notice back then, because it was people from your team doing it?


`
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:09 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top