Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You are completely spinning this to suit your agenda.
No one said anyone is too stupid to get an ID card. Not everyone has the resources to get an ID.
No one says they want illegals to vote.
Statements like this are so out of hand it is ridiculous.
Democrats don't come out and say the word "stupid" -- they imply it clearly.
They somehow explain that the same blacks or minorities who can get down to welfare and file complicated forms and have many repeat visits often far from where they live can't seem to get themselves or to or find the same place they would vote at to get an ID card.
The establishment Ds have often said that minorities won't be "motivated" enough to vote if they have to actually get an ID -- they say it will be too much of a burden.
What does that say?? How insulting and racist is that?
And of course Ds want illegals to vote -- Obama cheered even them on to do it!!
Democrats don't come out and say the word "stupid" -- they imply it clearly.
They somehow explain that the same blacks or minorities who can get down to welfare and file complicated forms and have many repeat visits often far from where they live can't seem to get themselves or to or find the same place they would vote at to get an ID card.
The establishment Ds have often said that minorities won't be "motivated" enough to vote if they have to actually get an ID -- they say it will be too much of a burden.
What does that say?? How insulting and racist is that?
And of course Ds want illegals to vote -- Obama cheered even them on to do it!!
It ias not a hypothetical. And look at the information that was uncovered in NC. Clearly the Republicans explored the demographics likely to happen and used them to determine the proposed legislation. There are also examples of its actual impact.
It is not a huge thing. A percent or two advantage to the Republicans. But perhaps sufficient to move some close elections.
Again if you wised to avoid voter fraud you would tighten or do away with absentee ballots. But that does not happen because it is believed those ballots trend Republican.
Oh come on, just because they CAN vote does not mean they DO vote. Seriously, ILLEGAL immigrants are all good people. They only break the laws that THEY disagree with. I am sure they agree they should not vote. Just because they are forced to break the laws such as illegally entering our country, illegally driving, illegally stealing SS# etc.. DOES NOT MEAN they would illegally vote. That's a no no... those others are laws that make their lives hard so they HAVE to break them.
Whoa there! 'Forced to break laws'? Wow. Someone stood over them and threatened to beat them into submission if they did not break a law?
And 'they only break laws that they disagree with'? Do you break any law you disagree with too?
While I agree in principle that just because one might break A law doesn't mean they necessarily also broke OTHER laws but your argument is so scary in how you phrased it that it defies logic as to how an educated individual could even use it in the form presented.
I do hope you are being sarcastic (but if you are then perhaps you need to make that very clear somewhere in your post. /sarc would do it).
Whoa there! 'Forced to break laws'? Wow. Someone stood over them and threatened to beat them into submission if they did not break a law?
And 'they only break laws that they disagree with'? Do you break any law you disagree with too?
While I agree in principle that just because one might break A law doesn't mean they necessarily also broke OTHER laws but your argument is so scary in how you phrased it that it defies logic as to how an educated individual could even use it in the form presented.
I do hope you are being sarcastic (but if you are then perhaps you need to make that very clear somewhere in your post. /sarc would do it).
Whoa there! 'Forced to break laws'? Wow. Someone stood over them and threatened to beat them into submission if they did not break a law?
And 'they only break laws that they disagree with'? Do you break any law you disagree with too?
While I agree in principle that just because one might break A law doesn't mean they necessarily also broke OTHER laws but your argument is so scary in how you phrased it that it defies logic as to how an educated individual could even use it in the form presented.
I do hope you are being sarcastic (but if you are then perhaps you need to make that very clear somewhere in your post. /sarc would do it).
Satire is not your friend.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
