Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It absolutely is. I've argued this point over and over and over. These subsidize were created to prop up Wall Street entities though. So they remained acceptably profitable to Wall Street.
Sure, let's take the profit motive out of healthcare and adopt medicare for all. Limit health insurance companies to selling supplements or concierge plans, dental and vision insurance. Also, allow import of drugs and require negotiation of prices.
Sure, let's take the profit motive out of healthcare and adopt medicare for all. Limit health insurance companies to selling supplements or concierge plans, dental and vision insurance. Also, allow import of drugs and require negotiation of prices.
Not sure why you are jumping in with that. My statement has nothing to do with two wrongs don't make a right; spending taxpayer money to provide people with health insurance is infinitely better than building this joke of a wall.
I'm perfectly happy if Trump is unwilling or unable to repeal and replace Obamacare - so in that case, yeah, it's no big deal. What's your point?
Ken
Well, it'll die on it's own anyway so you're right.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
