Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-16-2019, 10:46 AM
 
3,092 posts, read 1,955,265 times
Reputation: 3030

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2mares View Post
what you cant get through your head is that one cant pin paternity on another. .
Sure you can. And our present policies, and people like you, who will fight for the right to commit paternity fraud, insure that.


Quote:
You willfully and voluntarily sign a document stating you accept parentage and all the responsibilities without any proof that you are the biological father.
...based on the premise that the child was fathered by the signer. If that premise was false all along, the signature is invalid.


Listen, we understand: you love paternity fraud. You hate men and want them to suffer. Just be honest and admit it and we can all move on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-16-2019, 11:11 AM
 
11,413 posts, read 7,849,921 times
Reputation: 21928
It’s really child privilege not female privilege since the child, biological or not, is the beneficiary of any CHILD support payments. Right or wrong, states want kids to eat regardless of who foots the bill. I’m all for equalizing the responsibilities of male/female parents and even requiring Paternity testing for all newborns.

But, until that happens any guy worried about this issue should be given the same advice his brethren give women worried about getting pregnant and being denied access to abortion services: Then don’t have sex or use birth control. And if it fails, too bad so sad. Deal with it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2019, 11:20 AM
 
3,092 posts, read 1,955,265 times
Reputation: 3030
Quote:
Originally Posted by UNC4Me View Post
It’s really child privilege not female privilege since the child, biological or not, is the beneficiary of any CHILD support payments. Right or wrong, states want kids to eat regardless of who foots the bill. I’m all for equalizing the responsibilities of male/female parents and even requiring Paternity testing for all newborns.

But, until that happens any guy worried about this issue should be given the same advice his brethren give women worried about getting pregnant and being denied access to abortion services: Then don’t have sex or use birth control. And if it fails, too bad so sad. Deal with it.
Biological Dad can be ordered to pay child support; therefore this argument fails spectacularly. As hard as you paternity fraud defenders try, there really is no excuse for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2019, 11:27 AM
 
11,413 posts, read 7,849,921 times
Reputation: 21928
Quote:
Originally Posted by dysgenic View Post
Biological Dad can be ordered to pay child support; therefore this argument fails spectacularly. As hard as you paternity fraud defenders try, there really is no excuse for it.
Sure. There are scummy people in both sexes who seek to defraud others. That’s not debatable.

But, you’re pointing fingers at the wrong folks. Take it up with your State legislature. You know, that group made up mostly of MEN who write the laws you disagree with. They’re the ones with the power to change the laws. Why aren’t you angry with them?

And please explain how I defended paternity fraud. I didn’t but you’re clearly set on attacking anyone outside your echo chamber.

Last edited by UNC4Me; 08-16-2019 at 11:37 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2019, 11:28 AM
 
Location: In the outlet by the lightswitch
2,306 posts, read 1,712,132 times
Reputation: 4261
Quote:
Originally Posted by dysgenic View Post
Biological Dad can be ordered to pay child support; therefore this argument fails spectacularly. As hard as you paternity fraud defenders try, there really is no excuse for it.

Are you even reading posts? The person you quote specifically says they think there should be DNA testing to prove who the parents are. Wouldn't that be the opposite of a paternity fraud defender?

And the other person 2mares never said anything defending fraud, just that it can be avoided and how to avoid it.

Your arguing they like and defend fraud is like saying because a person warns you to avoid a certain part of town at night that they like and defend muggings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2019, 11:48 AM
 
Location: Honolulu/DMV Area/NYC
30,735 posts, read 18,414,284 times
Reputation: 34626
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldhag1 View Post
Unwed mothers can not give children up for adoption without permission of the father. If the father does not agree to the adoption and gets custody of the child the mother has to pay child support. If the child is adopted out both parents are relieved of financial responsibility.
I agree, but this is assuming the father is the putative father by law. If the father is not listed on the birth certificate, the father has to jump through some legal hoops to become the father of the child by law before any of those rights apply to him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2019, 12:10 PM
 
3,092 posts, read 1,955,265 times
Reputation: 3030
I'm def interested in checking out that book. Thank you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vector1 View Post
Indeed katzpaw is certainly a leftist and might even be a feminist.

Regardless I read an interesting book recently titled "Men On Strike" where it gives endless examples of how every segment of our society is blatantly biased in favor of women and/or against men.

Whether it be the prosecution of men sleeping with a teenage student vs. women doing the same with very disparate outcomes.

Or even how men are assumed to be sexual predators.
A crazy example was how an airline had a married couple sitting next to an unaccompanied minor in a three row seat arrangement.
The woman was assigned to the middle seat with her husband having the window. However she was pregnant and asked her husband to switch seats so she could be more comfortable leaning against the window side.
They did so, but were then told by the flight attendant the husband must move back to the original seat because,,,,,, and get this ,,,,, their policy was to never allow an unaccompanied minor to sit next to a man for "safety reasons".
The man said he felt embarrassed and was treated like a child molester based on the policy. He sued the airline and the story goes on from there.
It and many more examples are in this book;

https://www.amazon.com/Men-Strike-Bo.../dp/B00OFK22Y8

Though written by a woman, she explores many various ways men are discouraged to be married, involved Fathers in their kids lives, and are shunning the traditional roles they have always played in society.

I highly suggest it for those wondering what has happened to the male role model in American culture.


`
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2019, 12:27 PM
 
36,794 posts, read 31,078,970 times
Reputation: 33119
Quote:
Originally Posted by prospectheightsresident View Post
I agree, but this is assuming the father is the putative father by law. If the father is not listed on the birth certificate, the father has to jump through some legal hoops to become the father of the child by law before any of those rights apply to him.

Remedy that. Marry before reproducing. Dont reproduce indiscriminately. That way you will know if there is a pregnancy and you will be there to be listed on the birth certificate.
Now regardless of marriage and care there are some who will be bond to still find themselves in a position of having no clue they are a biological parent but we have laws that everyone has to abide by, we have to prove we are who we are all the time and if we dont have that proof we have to jump through hoops to satisfy the powers that be. That is not exclusive to fathers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2019, 12:36 PM
 
Location: Finland
6,418 posts, read 7,273,932 times
Reputation: 10441
MRAs are so tiresome and they never fail to reveal their misogyny.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2019, 12:50 PM
 
Location: TN/NC
35,197 posts, read 31,523,947 times
Reputation: 47733
The bottom line is that men are facing an uphill battle in family court, regardless of what how bad the mother is or how good the father is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:50 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top