Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why you think it is relevant to this discussion is beyond me.
The people cannot pardon someone for a crime.
I didn't know you were talking about a crime.
I'm talking about house and senate committees (no crime).
I doubt even Al Franken thinks a crime will come of this.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,411,082 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by swayalot
The electorate (that means voters in an election) measure your good and bad deeds. A time-wasting Russia probe loses votes.
A time-wasting Russia probe while The President makes unprecedented world peace, loses even more votes.
Oh, and Hillary won in a landslide, according to the polls, and Obama's huge approval rating made him a great campaign advantage for Hillary in 2016......
So feel free to believe the polls.
Multiple time/$$$ wasting Benghazi investigations didn't seem to lose votes, better make up a new theory.
I didn't know you were talking about a crime.
I'm talking about house and senate committees (no crime).
There is an ongoing investigation, and it's being carried on for more than just partisan politics (these investigations are being carried out either by bi-partisan groups or apolitical organizations).
An investigation is not going to be dropped because someone did something good, or even great. If he is found to be innocent - great. If he's found to not be, well, then he's guilty of whatever they find, and his good deeds before/after don't change that finding.
I think President Trump will deliver the Israel-Pal peace deal.
Do you think the Democrats will give up looking for ways to Impeach the President once that peace deal arrives?
I think it would look very wrong for them to pursue the Impeachment of such a global legend.
President Trump's international clout would simply be too large, and investigating him would make the Dems look incredibly anti-American and somewhat anti-Peace.
In my opinion, there are a few very big entities making very big money due to whatever is happening in the Middle East and in the Israel/Palestine conflict. These big players won't let their gold mine of a business get shut down.
Location: Born & Raised DC > Carolinas > Seattle > Denver
9,338 posts, read 7,113,345 times
Reputation: 9487
If Trump and his campaign staff truly have nothing to hide, then why are conservatives so worried about the ivnestigations?! Let the investigation play out, and then laugh at us when it's over because it turns out there was no collusion and the entire thing was a huge waste of time and money.
But that's not the way it's playing out, is it? Flynn asked for immunity, and when it was denied and subpoened, he pleaded the 5th.
If Clinton had won, and she were accused of having colluded with Russia, and one of her campaign staffers were asked to testify and pleaded the fifth, almost every conservative on here would be outraged. Is that true or no?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
