Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-03-2017, 07:59 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,049 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
I am pro-life but this is a lame argument.
No, it isn't. Find any other organization that objects to meeting surgery center standards like PP does.

Maybe if you understand how PP exploits Black and Brown, you'll get it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-03-2017, 08:15 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,222,338 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
No, it isn't. Find any other organization that objects to meeting surgery center standards like PP does.

Maybe if you understand how PP exploits Black and Brown, you'll get it.
I explained why. You decided to leave it out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2017, 08:27 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,049 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
I explained why. You decided to leave it out.
In light of this info, your explanation means squat:

Planned Parenthood Surgical Abortion Facilities Map

Abortion's Racial Gap - The Atlantic
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2017, 08:42 AM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,230,847 times
Reputation: 12102
Quote:
Originally Posted by NLVgal View Post
It's not the birth control that costs a lot of money. It's the required visit to the ob-gynecologist to get it. Minimum $150, plus lab fees for the Pap smear before you can have the prescription. Planned Parenthood used to offer those exams and a prescription based on your ability to pay ( sliding scale fees)

Oh well, if they get rid of the family planning clinics, I guess people will just get more abortions out of state or maybe abandon their unwanted baby as we've seen teenage girls do in the past.
Again ostupidcare was supposed to take care of that. Why I declined healthcare insurance after the lie. I, as a, single guy would have to carry insurance for female junk. So if ostupidcare covered it, why is PP even existing?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2017, 08:45 AM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,230,847 times
Reputation: 12102
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohiogirl81 View Post
And yours fails with the first word. But nevermind that; since apparently you've never used the pill, or a diaphragm or an IUD or any other form of internal protection, you are ignorant of the fact that one needs a doctor's prescription to get it. Planned Parenthood provides that, with insurance or Medicaid if you have that, or on a sliding scale if you don't have insurance. If you have Medicaid, it's not as easy as just making an appointment with your family doctor, because not every doc or clinic accepts Medicaid.
ACA was supposed to cover that. So are you telling Me ACA is useless because PP is needed?

Why is the gov funding both when only one is needed?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2017, 09:03 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,222,338 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
More minorities are poor and can less afford kids. I addressed that. You support policies that keep it that way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2017, 09:13 AM
 
Location: Philaburbia
41,965 posts, read 75,217,462 times
Reputation: 66933
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
ACA was supposed to cover that. So are you telling Me ACA is useless because PP is needed?

Why is the gov funding both when only one is needed?
Damn, this is like talking to a brick wall.

Don't be obtuse. Medical insurance pays for birth control. The ACA expanded Medicaid in some states. Medicaid is medical insurance; therefore, it covers birth control.

What the ACA didn't do was mandate that every doctor in the land accept Medicaid.

Do you get it now?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2017, 09:47 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,049 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
More minorities are poor and can less afford kids. I addressed that. You support policies that keep it that way.
Not 5 times as many. Read up on Margaret Sanger, PP's founder. She was a eugenecistic racist. PP is the same.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2017, 10:50 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,222,338 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Not 5 times as many. Read up on Margaret Sanger, PP's founder. She was a eugenecistic racist. PP is the same.
Trump's dad was arrested in a Fascist/KKK riot......hence Trump must be one or the other?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2017, 11:56 AM
 
18,395 posts, read 19,027,378 times
Reputation: 15707
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Maybe we emphasis the poor and lower classes a little more than Wall Street and there are fewer that need fed?

P.S. there are very few babies not spoken for. There are waiting lists for babies. Don't confuse adoption with the foster system. The majority of those in the foster system are there while we try and place them back into their birth families and are not up for adoption.

With the further acceptance of gay marriage there will also be more families looking to adopt.

yes babies get adopted right away. there are at any given time 250,000 children in foster care who are eligible for adoption and or age out of the system. this does not include the ones that are ineligible for adoption. more people should be willing to adopt older children but they just don't for some reason.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:41 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top