Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You just ignored my question. And created a diversion. Answer me first and I will answer you. I am not advancing a simile, as you are. Just whether the same rules apply to everyone. Fair enough right?
To be fair, you won't like either.
Once again, you stated (heavily implied) that the fact Clinton paid is proof he was guilty. Since Trump paid is he also guilty?
It is a really easy question. Then I will address your question. First come, first serve.
If Trump pays, I think that shows he was guilty just like Clinton.
Now, you do agree that Weiner's actions have direct bearing on the Clintons right?
If Trump pays, I think that shows he was guilty just like Clinton.
Now, you do agree that Weiner's actions have direct bearing on the Clintons right?
Trump DID pay to settle the Trump U lawsuit. Thus he is, by your own words, a grifter.
Thank you.
Now, since the Clinton's are not accused of sexting children, there is no connection to them other than guilt by association. If that were how life works, then if anyone in the Trump circle is shown guilty of any crimes, then Trump is equally guilty (by your definition).
Trump DID pay to settle the Trump U lawsuit. Thus he is, by your own words, a grifter.
Thank you.
Now, since the Clinton's are not accused of sexting children, there is no connection to them other than guilt by association. If that were how life works, then if anyone in the Trump circle is shown guilty of any crimes, then Trump is equally guilty (by your definition).
Again, thank you.
Did he pay a settlement to any of his sexual harassment accusers?
Why change the topic?
Weiners actions were about sex. Why isn't that relative? Of course it is.
Come on , you love guilt by exceptionally loose connections. Why exclude Weiner? Why are you aftraid to address it?
Come on, you're all about Ailes and OReiily, so let's talk Weiner.
What about all the other Democrats tied to Weiner, shouldn't they be investigated about sexual harassment?
Did he pay a settlement to any of his sexual harassment accusers?
Why change the topic?
Weiners actions were about sex. Why isn't that relative? Of course it is.
Come on , you love guilt by exceptionally loose connections. Why exclude Weiner? Why are you aftraid to address it?
Come on, you're all about Ailes and OReiily, so let's talk Weiner.
What about all the other Democrats tied to Weiner, shouldn't they be investigated about sexual harassment?
I said (and it does get tiresome repeating myself, as you create straw men) that IF Trump settles in the current lawsuit against him, will YOU consider him a de facto sex offender. Not that he did settle yet. Review what I posted. Quote me if necessary. As I am not putting words in your mouth, I would appreciate the same level of respect from you.
If anyone has evidence that ANYONE (regardless of political affiliation) committed a sexual offense, then they should be tried and if found guilty, sentenced. Just like Weiner. His associates are not relevant, unless there is evidence that they also did same. Really quite simple. I do not believe in guilt by association. Do you?
Then why did you bring up Ailes and OReilly when talking about Trump?
That is what you've got left? I used it as an example because you said that if someone settles a lawsuit they are guilty. O'Reilly settled. Guilty! Ailes was fired and died before he could be sued. His firing might be construed as "guilty" by your definition.
That is what you've got left? I used it as an example because you said that if someone settles a lawsuit they are guilty. O'Reilly settled. Guilty! Ailes was fired and died before he could be sued. His firing might be construed as "guilty" by your definition.
Ever heard the phrase "Good for the Goose"?
Lol, really?
You tried to go guilt by association and then I threw Weiner in your face.
You tried to go guilt by association and then I threw Weiner in your face.
You must teach a spin class.
Quote me. In context.
You may convince yourself of almost anything. But, there are many reading this.
I'm not trying to convince you. I'm giving you rope. It is the equivalent of shooting fish in a barrel.
Weiner is guilty. He pled. Never said otherwise. You tried to connect him to others.
Again quote me. What I love about the internet is that it is all there in black and white!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
