Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-20-2017, 06:34 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,373,891 times
Reputation: 14459

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by t0103e View Post
yep, 0%.
roads????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-20-2017, 06:47 PM
 
Location: PSL
8,224 posts, read 3,500,240 times
Reputation: 2963
Quote:
Originally Posted by YourWakeUpCall View Post
Yep. I've said this many times and I'm not sure why almost nobody gets it.
I do. That's what I propose.

Current cost to operate the federal government divided by every living breathing citizen.

It would be a flat tax.

Everyone would pay the same money, and it would limit exactly how much uncle Sam gets to spend. Transitions power from capital hill to the citizens.

Want to go into another war that will increase our tax burden? Chances are it's not going to happen if it's not popular in the citizens eyes. We boycott businesses who's political stances we disagree with...
What's that business do to remain relevant when revenue shrinks? Trims the fat.

What would the government have to do if it had to rely on everyone? Trim the fat.

You'd see federal executive branches be the first to go. Less federal employees.

Not satisfied with your online order of goods? Call up the credit card company and dispute it. Don't like what your elected officials do? Same thing. Don't pay. They can't draw a check. Bye bye inept representative. Find some grime and shady happenings where they were helped to be put in power by the elite? Don't pay and dispute.

Would essentially weed every single would be career politician out of holding office.
Would essentially end the big time deficit...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2017, 06:49 PM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,848 posts, read 17,620,010 times
Reputation: 29385
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
Still waiting for a number.

Personally, I think the fair share should be 0%. Nobody should be paying taxes on their income.
Lifeexplorer for President!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2017, 07:03 PM
 
45,232 posts, read 26,457,645 times
Reputation: 24994
Hmmm whats a fair amount of theft?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2017, 07:04 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
4,490 posts, read 3,932,406 times
Reputation: 14538
Quote:
Originally Posted by spectator11040 View Post
NOT.
Have you even taken a minute to think of what a consumption tax is? The wealthy consume A LOT more than the poor. Therefore thy would they would be taxed A LOT more.
The advantage of a consumption tax over an income tax is that a consumption tax encourages frugality and savings. The saving of money encourages investment and lending. That's better for the economy and the environment.
An income tax is basically a way of redistributing income. Those who produce more are forced to in effect transfer much their earnings to those who produce little or produce nothing. It's a tool which has the effect of discouraging hard work and encouraging, in some cases, healthy people to not work at all because they can collect from the government as much as they could by getting a job.
Good points. AND we would be able to collect taxes from tourists, illegal aliens and layabouts who currently contribute nothing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2017, 07:54 PM
 
8,886 posts, read 4,585,685 times
Reputation: 16247
Quote:
Originally Posted by YourWakeUpCall View Post
Yep. I've said this many times and I'm not sure why almost nobody gets it.
Please read this:

https://www.google.com/#q=flat+tax&spf=1498009910308

Mahalo
Hoot
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2017, 08:46 PM
 
Location: San Diego
18,741 posts, read 7,617,731 times
Reputation: 15011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoot N Annie View Post
Please read this:
No thanks. Summarize it and make an argument. If, that is, you want to contribute something worthwhile to the thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2017, 08:49 PM
 
12,772 posts, read 7,980,917 times
Reputation: 4332
You can't legislate "fair" its an arbitrary term that means a billion different things to a billion different people. To democrats, "fair" seems to mean anyone who manages to eat more than mac and cheese every day for dinner.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2017, 10:43 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,373,891 times
Reputation: 14459
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
Hmmm whats a fair amount of theft?
I don't know.

The government does though. That's why I pay taxes.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2017, 10:47 PM
 
Location: Florida
10,479 posts, read 4,046,033 times
Reputation: 8491
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
if we are talking a flat tax...10% or maybe 15% at most... no person should pay a different percentage than the other...we are all equal, tax us equally

no one or entity should pay more than 15%...if the government cant run on 15% of everyone income...then the government has a spending problem


personally I would rather see the income tax go the way of the Dinosaur , taxing income, especially when 17% to 52% of income is never reported (people working off the books)... I would rather a consumption tax (a federal sales tax)....

research www.fair-tax.org this is the way to go in my humble opinion
I agree. Why should people who have kids get breaks over those who chose not to have kids. Why should married couples be treated different than those who are single. Why should people who studied hard when they were in their teens, went to college instead of partying, and then got a good career that pays well be punished over those who think they are entitled?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:05 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top