Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Ok but besides O'Keefe, the content is very relevant. What do you say about that.
But therein lies the problem. It's hard to not attack the source when said source hasn't to date released anything of relevance that wasn't heavily edited, eventually debunked and resulted in a lawsuit and/or arrest. He's not an investigative journalist, nor is he even a provocateur.
But therein lies the problem. It's hard to not attack the source when said source hasn't to date released anything of relevance that wasn't heavily edited, eventually debunked and resulted in a lawsuit and/or arrest. He's not an investigative journalist, nor is he even a provocateur.
What about the people on video saying what they said?
When someone looks back at the news coverage and try's to find who was asking the right questions and who was right. Its hard to find someone that beats Tucker Carlson. We can also see the elected loons that were playing politics to the detriment of national security. None more disgusting than self described CIA Democrat Eric Swelwell.
I guess they don't need to seeing as how the WSJ, clearly a liberal fake news MSM rag, has picked up the reporting lately...but hey enjoy the confirmation bias you surround yourself with and don't ever try to challenge your preconceived notions or see what's really going on in the world.....
The reality bubble is fascinating. Multiple foreign intelligence agencies, the FBI, CIA, NSA, the House, Senate, even Vladimir Putin, are victims of a false news story manufactured by CNN? The WSJ is a liberal rag?
This is crazy... There is no reality with objective, verifiable facts for so many people.
The reality bubble is fascinating. Multiple foreign intelligence agencies, the FBI, CIA, NSA, the House, Senate, Vladimir Putin, etc are all victims of a false news story manufactured by CNN? The WSJ is a liberal rag?
This is crazy... There is no reality with objective, verifiable facts for so many people.
yup- Infowars and Breitbart...those are the only credible new sources somehow....gay frogs, thermite paint, and a heaping dose of racism...that's what they see as non-biases journalism these days....
Ok but besides O'Keefe, the content is very relevant. What do you say about that.
I would want to see his raw, unedited footage before I believed anything that O'Keefe produces. He is well known for his deception.
And just for clarification, I watched the video in the OP. The most hilarious part is O'Keefe gravely talking about how CNN pared down an hour and a half of a panel interview to eight minutes, and how "striking" what they chose to omit was. Hilarious coming from him. No one knows how to do that better than O'Keefe.
The big bomshell--CNN lives by its ratings!! Wow, how earth shattering!! So does Fox News. Maybe lil Jimmie should go undercover there and ask his same questions of them. But he won't because that doesn't fit his agenda.
To paraphrase one of the people they taped, this whole thing is a big nothingburger. CNN may be shaking in thier boots, but only because they're laughing so hard at "investigative journalist" O'Keefe.
I very clearly heard them cover the Flynn collusion story that was in the WSJ yesterday.
Tick tock.
Tick tock.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
