Trump offers to help terminally ill Charlie Gard (single, country, family)

[jojajn]

Originally Posted by LoveToRow

Sounds like you need to move to Canada, too.

Here in America we take care of ourselves and don't depend on government handouts.

We just give up our homes instead.

[jojajn]

Originally Posted by dechatelet

The picture I saw of him in the hospital didn't show him suffering at all.

He looked very healthy, well-fed, with good color, and was peacefully sleeping.

How long would you like to live like this?



https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/324842...-donald-trump/

A specialist in paediatric medicine at GOSH told the judge that Charlie was "extremely unwell" and likely to be feeling pain, adding there was a "very small" theoretical chance treatment would result in any improvement.

http://www.getwestlondon.co.uk/news/...taken-12838849

[jojajn]

Originally Posted by dechatelet

Sorry, not buying it.

If you're suffering and unhealthy, it shows.

How does it show on a baby that cannot move any part of his body, including his face?

[jojajn]

Originally Posted by dechatelet

I would saying murdering a little boy is cruel.

If you feel that way, you can donate to the fund to keep Charlie alive.

[Ringo1]

Originally Posted by jojajn

How does it show on a baby that cannot move any part of his body, including his face?

They don't know. ALL they know is Trump said we can help the baby so to hell with the medical experts and they will back Trump.

I notice no one is stepping up to volunteer to live THEIR life as a permanent vegetable.

Originally Posted by jojajn

If you feel that way, you can donate to the fund to keep Charlie alive.

All these internet doctors; have they even read what the experts have said?

[jojajn]

Originally Posted by dechatelet

Wait, I thought that allowing him to continue living was "torture".

You guys need to get your stories straight.

Seems that boy has a lot to live for, right? What specifics do you think that boy is enjoying about life?

[No_Recess]

Haven't read one post in here.

Let me guess: liberal statists arguing the government has ruled to end his life and the parents have no say.

How'd I do?

[Scooby Snacks]

Originally Posted by No_Recess

Haven't read one post in here.

Let me guess: liberal statists arguing the government has ruled to end his life and the parents have no say.

How'd I do?

The parents can keep him alive on the machines if they can pay for it themselves. The British government is not willing to continue paying for medical care on an infant who is terminally ill and has zero hope of improvement.

[jojajn]

Originally Posted by Scooby Snacks

The parents can keep him alive on the machines if they can pay for it themselves. The British government is not willing to continue paying for medical care on an infant who is terminally ill and has zero hope of improvement.

^^^This and the right-wing posters here believe our tax dollars should be used to keep baby Charlie from dying as long as possible.

[moneill]

Originally Posted by Scooby Snacks

The parents can keep him alive on the machines if they can pay for it themselves. The British government is not willing to continue paying for medical care on an infant who is terminally ill and has zero hope of improvement.

That's not the ruling.

You know that right?