Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-25-2017, 02:03 PM
 
10,776 posts, read 4,353,901 times
Reputation: 5839

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet View Post
Lying under oath (perjury) is illegal. It doesn't matter what the lie is about.

Witness tampering and obstructing justice is also illegal. Bill Clinton did both of those.
Then why didn't Clapper get charged with perjury when he lied to Congress?

 
Old 08-25-2017, 02:05 PM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,554,711 times
Reputation: 24780
Talking tRump investigates?

Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9 View Post
Of course, it's a fact. Brennan, Clapper, and Rogers were saying (falsely) that they already figured out that the DNC's servers were hacked and that the Russians had done it. So what was left if we accepted their assertions at face value? Whether Trump colluded in the alleged hacking.

But Trump doesn't need to investigate that since he knows the answer. So there was nothing for Trump to investigate if he trusted the assertions of these intelligence officials.
FYI: tRump is the subject of multiple investigations.

Stay tuned for further developments.

There's no telling what Mueller will find.

But this promises to be very entertaining.

 
Old 08-25-2017, 02:12 PM
 
8,420 posts, read 7,422,672 times
Reputation: 8769
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9 View Post
The source of the tape is not this Fairbanks woman. She might have publicized it, but she's not the source.
Funny, "this Fairbanks woman" was the one who authored the article that originally presented the audio.
Every article that mentions the fake Hersh audio points back to her as the original source.

Quote:
And it's authentic. Hersh doesn't deny it, but you do?
Can you point me to a source where Hersh confirms that it's him on the audio?

And I tried listening to that overlong audio, but could only make it through a few minutes. It's not Hersh - the accent and speech patterns on the audio are totally different from Seymour Hersh's accent.

Face it, it's an unsubstantiated audio recording from a dubious source with ties to the Russian state-run media.
 
Old 08-25-2017, 02:22 PM
 
18,561 posts, read 7,380,719 times
Reputation: 11382
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmilf View Post
Funny, "this Fairbanks woman" was the one who authored the article that originally presented the audio.
Every article that mentions the fake Hersh audio points back to her as the original source.

Can you point me to a source where Hersh confirms that it's him on the audio?

And I tried listening to that overlong audio, but could only make it through a few minutes. It's not Hersh - the accent and speech patterns on the audio are totally different from Seymour Hersh's accent.

Face it, it's an unsubstantiated audio recording from a dubious source with ties to the Russian state-run media.
You're trying to gaslight us. It does sound like Hersh. The speech patterns are his and inimitable. And Butowsky is the source. It's his phone conversation with Hersh that was recorded.

And Rod Wheeler's attorneys are staking their reputations on the fact that it's Hersh. The complaint they filed on Wheeler's behalf quotes at length from the audiotape.
 
Old 08-25-2017, 02:24 PM
 
Location: Lyon, France, Whidbey Island WA
20,836 posts, read 17,112,746 times
Reputation: 11535
The lyin' Yankee sos clinton started that one too. My wife and I are still giddy with glee about the election.!
 
Old 08-25-2017, 02:31 PM
 
Location: FL
20,702 posts, read 12,542,103 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet View Post
Quite a while. Because Bill Clinton was obstructing justice which delayed the investigation.
Like Trump is doing?
 
Old 08-25-2017, 02:33 PM
 
Location: FL
20,702 posts, read 12,542,103 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
FYI: tRump is the subject of multiple investigations.

Stay tuned for further developments.

There's no telling what Mueller will find.

But this promises to be very entertaining.

 
Old 08-25-2017, 02:42 PM
 
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
1,722 posts, read 1,744,435 times
Reputation: 1342
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeerGeek40 View Post
The media and their leftist allies did their best, I have to give them credit.


They worked extremely hard at convincing everyone that the election was stolen away from Hillary.


The only problem was, there really wasn't any truth to it. Sure, there were a few meetings here and there. But there was nothing ever proven that Trump or his people did anything illegal.


There was no evidence that anyone's vote was ever changed from Hillary to Trump.....as anyone with common sense could have told you.


So here we are, 7 months into Trump's presidency.


What will they think up next?

Seriously? What news are you watching? Would it be FOX, et al.?
You'll see. Mueller and his team are quietly working away and when the truth comes out only the most blind trump cultists will deny the truth. You'll see.
It takes time.
 
Old 08-25-2017, 02:48 PM
 
Location: Mount Airy, Maryland
16,282 posts, read 10,424,652 times
Reputation: 27604
Quote:
Originally Posted by amenalot View Post
Mueller is in a can't win situation, because he HAS TO come up with something or else he's deemed a failure, but whatever he comes up with will have no credibility (because he hired Clinton's lawyers).

What on Earth are you talking about? Since when do investigators feel pressure to come up with something when there is nothing? If there was nothing to all off this how on Earth would that ever be perceived as a Mueller failure? He would simply proclaim there was not enough evidence to pursue further.


This is not that hard to understand.
 
Old 08-25-2017, 03:28 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,511 posts, read 33,325,190 times
Reputation: 7623
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet View Post
Quite a while. Because Bill Clinton was obstructing justice which delayed the investigation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donna-501 View Post
Like Trump is doing?
He is? How so?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:29 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top