Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-21-2017, 05:26 PM
 
21,989 posts, read 15,713,056 times
Reputation: 12943

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
and what do you think would happen with singlepayer.....''''''rich''''' California will be paying for all of '''''super poor''''' Mississippi , who wont be paying anything into the singlepayer

IOW ...Mississippi would be California's black stepchild dependent
Republicans are now trying to bribe Alaska, who has been on Obamacare all along by letting them keep Obamacare plus receive the new benefits.

"This proposal would let Alaska keep its Obamacare money, reap the Graham-Cassidy money on top of that, boost its Medicaid match rate, and not have to abide by the trade-offs of either bill."

Murkowski buy-off watch: Senate GOP may just let Alaska keep Obamacare.

Nothing like red state Alaska double dipping at the trough, getting all the old money plus the new money on a REPEAL bill.

 
Old 09-21-2017, 05:35 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,488,320 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
Republicans are now trying to bribe Alaska, who has been on Obamacare all along by letting them keep Obamacare plus receive the new benefits.

"This proposal would let Alaska keep its Obamacare money, reap the Graham-Cassidy money on top of that, boost its Medicaid match rate, and not have to abide by the trade-offs of either bill."

Murkowski buy-off watch: Senate GOP may just let Alaska keep Obamacare.

Nothing like red state Alaska double dipping at the trough, getting all the old money plus the new money on a REPEAL bill.
and the state with the HIGHEST percent of all minorities.....Alaska


do you have something against minorities????

is this how liberals view minorities now???
 
Old 09-21-2017, 05:39 PM
 
Location: Lone Mountain Las Vegas NV
18,058 posts, read 10,350,196 times
Reputation: 8828
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
and the state with the HIGHEST percent of all minorities.....Alaska


do you have something against minorities????

is this how liberals view minorities now???
Untrue. 61% non Hispanic white. Well more than CA 37%
 
Old 09-21-2017, 05:40 PM
 
21,989 posts, read 15,713,056 times
Reputation: 12943
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
and the state with the HIGHEST percent of all minorities.....Alaska

do you have something against minorities????

is this how liberals view minorities now???
Minorities? Is that the rationale? Nothing to do with the fact that they are trying to buy Alaska's vote? Here is another proposal they are trying, where are all the minorities here? Because what I see are they are all RED STATES. They are trying to bribe red states into this bill by letting them keep Obamacare!!!!!

"The Medicaid delay would potentially apply to Alaska, Wyoming, South Dakota, North Dakota and Montana.."

Alaska could get relief from Senate repeal bill's Medicaid cuts - POLITICO
 
Old 09-21-2017, 05:42 PM
 
3,594 posts, read 1,793,885 times
Reputation: 4726
They really can't make assumptions because they have no clue what the states are going to do with the money. I trust my state government a hell of a lot more than the federal government.
 
Old 09-21-2017, 05:45 PM
 
21,989 posts, read 15,713,056 times
Reputation: 12943
Quote:
Originally Posted by cttransplant85 View Post
They really can't make assumptions because they have no clue what the states are going to do with the money. I trust my state government a hell of a lot more than the federal government.
Why should some states get to keep Obamacare when others lose it? Why are Republicans trying to buy votes in states like Alaska by letting them keep Obamacare? Why should every state contribute while certain states get much larger slices of the pie?
 
Old 09-21-2017, 05:47 PM
 
Location: Chesapeake Bay
6,046 posts, read 4,817,498 times
Reputation: 3544
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
you have something against helping the African American population???
It would be an accident and truly surprising if this bill helped ANYONE.

Follow the money. This bill isn't about healthcare.
 
Old 09-21-2017, 06:08 PM
 
Location: Florida
23,795 posts, read 13,261,787 times
Reputation: 19952
Quote:
Originally Posted by evilcart View Post
it is the endless scare stories promoted by vested interests and fool that keeps us in this costly and low value system.

my mom takes a drug that costs about 47 euros a month, but cost almost 400 a month in the USA. Her EU doc is highly skilled and the hospital is state of the art. the pharmas and their middle men are just ripping us off.

it is no wonder they fight so hard. they can charge 2x 4x 10x what they charge in the EU....

those republicans who resist universal care are simply protecting big pharma, large insurance corps and corporate hospital chains...
the Trumpers and republicans are helping global corps stick it to working americans.
It is hard to figure out Trumpers, they are actively supporting big wall street healthcare corps at the expense of their own neighbors and children...
Exactly. And how does this new bill address bringing the costs of health care down?

Oh yeah. It doesn't.

Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
That's because she is being subsidized by the high prescription costs in the USA and without the high costs here that drug may not even be available if the R&D that went into is not warranted by the low costs there.

You are welcome.
Not true. We do not subsidize the drugs for other countries.

We pay the the corporate shareholders massive profits and allow the pharmaceutical execs to be paid huge over-inflated salaries. And oh yeah--we pay for all those obnoxious ads that pharmaceutical companies run. That expensive advertising is crucial to our health.

What we don't do that Europe does is insist on price controls. Because that is socialism and Americans hate socialism. So no price controls for us. We smugly prefer to get screwed on prices, but no socialism for us.
 
Old 09-21-2017, 06:08 PM
 
9,837 posts, read 4,636,611 times
Reputation: 7292
Quote:
Originally Posted by RMESMH View Post
Yeah, that's right, toss out a personal anecdote rather than refute anything the person you were replying to wrote....because you can't.
but we can. just list out your reasons why we should not have some version of universal healthcare and we will absolutely destroy your points, with ease.

You see many of the advocates for changing our healthcare insurance system have real life experience of other systems.

and frankly if we were to spend what we currently spend but on a public system , we would have the best in the world. but we dont need to , we could cut our healthcare bill by 30% and still leave everyone better off. Well not me my investments in Pharma would get crushed...

hmm maybe they part of the vested interests that are blocking any advancements...
 
Old 09-21-2017, 06:11 PM
 
476 posts, read 1,134,955 times
Reputation: 956
Default Repeal and Go **** Yourself

Repeal and Go F*** Yourself

The "fiscally responsible" GOP won't even let the bi-partisan Congressional Budget Office review and assess the effects of the bill.

This bill allows insurers to deny basic coverage that the ACA (Obamacare) protects:
Quote:
Pregnancy and maternity care
Prescription drugs
Mental health services
Reproductive health services, including birth control
Substance abuse treatment
The bill leaves 32 million human beings without coverage.

The bill redistributes wealth. During ACA, republican governors refused to accept federal funds for expanded Medicare coverage, hurting their own citizens in the process. Now they are happy to accept funding.

Mental health services aren't important until there's a mass shooting. Then folks want to know why the person didn't get help.

Reproductive services aren't important until the teen pregnancy rate, currently at An All Time Low, spikes again. Then it's time to complain about all the freeloaders on welfare and why they didn't use birth control.

This bill is shortsighted at best and criminal at worst.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:35 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top