Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-04-2017, 12:29 PM
 
Location: Denver CO
24,201 posts, read 19,224,183 times
Reputation: 38267

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by skycaller23 View Post
Actually Tillerson said he was not going to deal with that "petty stuff".

Really..we have major media reporting on name calling ? That's childish and immature.
And that garnished headlines today ?

I'm glad Tillerson didn't stoop to that low and took the high road and called it "petty stuff".
and again. NOT a denial.

And it's not about the name calling, it's about the fact that the Secretary of State seemingly has no faith in the President's ability to be President. You may consider that petty but many of us think it's pretty significant that the highest ranking cabinet secretary thinks the president is a moron.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-04-2017, 12:35 PM
 
Location: Bel Air, California
23,766 posts, read 29,074,074 times
Reputation: 37337
Quote:
Originally Posted by skycaller23 View Post
Actually Tillerson said he was not going to deal with that "petty stuff".

Really..we have major media reporting on name calling ? That's childish and immature.
And that garnished headlines today ?

I'm glad Tillerson didn't stoop to that low and took the high road and called it "petty stuff".
LOL, you think the Secretary of State holding the opinion that the POTUS is an imbecile is not worth reporting on? Ohhhhh-K
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2017, 12:37 PM
 
2,212 posts, read 1,075,078 times
Reputation: 1381
Quote:
Originally Posted by emm74 View Post
and again. NOT a denial.

And it's not about the name calling, it's about the fact that the Secretary of State seemingly has no faith in the President's ability to be President. You may consider that petty but many of us think it's pretty significant that the highest ranking cabinet secretary thinks the president is a moron.
Then you believe the NBC story as told by "unnamed sources".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2017, 12:42 PM
 
45,676 posts, read 24,030,238 times
Reputation: 15559
Quote:
Originally Posted by skycaller23 View Post
Actually Tillerson said he was not going to deal with that "petty stuff".

Really..we have major media reporting on name calling ? That's childish and immature.
And that garnished headlines today ?

I'm glad Tillerson didn't stoop to that low and took the high road and called it "petty stuff".
How petty for the media to report on someone saying that Tillerson -- a big hot shot in Trump's administration called Trump a moron.

Cut to th ePresident throwing paper towels into a crowd -- as disaster relief entertainment...that's way more relevant.

Or better yet -- rather than cover the disaster in Puerto Rico -- let's spend countless hours on a mindless school board employee in the north east who did something stupid -- because that's critical and important.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2017, 12:43 PM
 
45,676 posts, read 24,030,238 times
Reputation: 15559
He did clearly say he never intended to resign and clearly did not deny saying Trump was a moron.

ooh what a spanking -- for Trump. LOL.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2017, 12:45 PM
 
Location: Denver CO
24,201 posts, read 19,224,183 times
Reputation: 38267
Quote:
Originally Posted by skycaller23 View Post
Then you believe the NBC story as told by "unnamed sources".
I might have been more skeptical before but Tillerson's non-denial has me believing it's accurate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2017, 12:46 PM
 
45,676 posts, read 24,030,238 times
Reputation: 15559
AND...he must think there is tape or something. WHy wouldn't you just deny it for goodness sake....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2017, 12:49 PM
 
3,992 posts, read 2,460,570 times
Reputation: 2350
Quote:
Originally Posted by skycaller23 View Post
Then you believe the NBC story as told by "unnamed sources".


you know you used the line on the Manfort stuff already.....


and on the Spicey stuff
and the Mooch Stuff
and the Bannon stuff
and The Reince stuff
and the Donny Jr stuff
and the Kushner Stuff
and the Flynn stuff
and the ACA repeal issues


just sayin'.....


btw- has anyone seen Hope Hicks lately...you would think WH Communications director might have been heard from in last 30 days....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2017, 12:58 PM
 
13,694 posts, read 9,016,074 times
Reputation: 10417
Quote:
Originally Posted by emm74 View Post
I might have been more skeptical before but Tillerson's non-denial has me believing it's accurate.
I tend to believe that Mr. Tillerson may well have used the term, perhaps in a moment of frustration.


The danger in today's world: so long as you are with other people, you can never be sure that your words are not being recorded (see, for example, Mr. Mitt Romney).


IF Mr. Tillerson used the term, then adamantly denied using the term, and THEN someone leaked a recording of his using the word, then all heck would break loose.


It bears the mark of a prudent man to deny in an oblique way, without actually proclaiming total innocence. I do believe Mr. Tillerson is a prudent man.


As for Mr. Trump: he may well say "I believe Mr. Tillerson". However, even if an Angel* came down and appeared before Mr. Trump, and swore that Mr. Tillerson had not used the word, Mr. Trump would nevertheless keep the possible insult in the back of his mind. Mr. Trump cannot help it. It is not for nothing that he is considered 'thin skinned'.








*a male Angel is suggested for such a task. A comely female Angel may find herself being 'grabbed' in 'all the wrong places'.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2017, 01:03 PM
 
Location: Denver CO
24,201 posts, read 19,224,183 times
Reputation: 38267
Quote:
Originally Posted by legalsea View Post
I tend to believe that Mr. Tillerson may well have used the term, perhaps in a moment of frustration.


The danger in today's world: so long as you are with other people, you can never be sure that your words are not being recorded (see, for example, Mr. Mitt Romney).


IF Mr. Tillerson used the term, then adamantly denied using the term, and THEN someone leaked a recording of his using the word, then all heck would break loose.


It bears the mark of a prudent man to deny in an oblique way, without actually proclaiming total innocence. I do believe Mr. Tillerson is a prudent man.



As for Mr. Trump: he may well say "I believe Mr. Tillerson". However, even if an Angel* came down and appeared before Mr. Trump, and swore that Mr. Tillerson had not used the word, Mr. Trump would nevertheless keep the possible insult in the back of his mind. Mr. Trump cannot help it. It is not for nothing that he is considered 'thin skinned'.








*a male Angel is suggested for such a task. A comely female Angel may find herself being 'grabbed' in 'all the wrong places'.

He still could have said something like "I have every confidence in President Trump's ability to lead the nation in our time of crisis" - still evading the question but trying to deny that he actually feels Trump is a moron regardless of what he might have said in a moment of frustration.

I think the bottom line is that he said AND he actually feels that Trump is a moron. And of course, he's not alone in that.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:03 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top