Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Happy Mother`s Day to all Moms!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-26-2017, 11:26 AM
 
Location: Proxima Centauri
5,819 posts, read 3,246,697 times
Reputation: 6150

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener2307 View Post
The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled a cross, in place for 100 years, is now unconstitutional. It is......... well, shaped like a cross and is maintained (flowers and landscaping by teh city government) . And it recognizes sacrifices made in WW1.

I, personally, disagree with the ruling and see no harm in letting the monument stand.

So who ruled in favor of cross removal?
James A Wynn...... First nominated by Clinton, but was never confirmed, and later by Obama in 2010.
Stephanie D Thacker.... Nominated by Obama and confirmed in 2011.

And who dissented?
Chief Roger L Gregory.... Nominated and confirmed in 2001 by Bush, although he was initially placed in a recess appointment by Clinton.

This is why Trump's judicial appointments are important. Obama stacked the courts with whatever liberals he could get, and Trump is busy undoing that damage. Since federal judicial placement are for life, the only way to undo the damage is to try to outnumber the progressives.

The story is all over the internet and news, so I will not cite any particular source.

FWIW: I am a non christian Republican. I do not go to church.

What's your take on all this?
All over the net. This is what I found: Judge says giant cross must be removed from San Diego mountain - CNN

If you look to the right on this web page you will see that Judge Burns was appointed by Bush.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Alan_Burns

Did you take this story and twist it around to make the Democrats look anti-Christain?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-26-2017, 11:30 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,599,424 times
Reputation: 24780
Cool christian monuments = christian responsibility

Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener2307 View Post
Clever stuff, but do you address the problem?
Repeatedly in multiple pages of this thread.

My posts are all there for you to refer to.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2017, 11:32 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,352 posts, read 54,520,826 times
Reputation: 40819
I'm guessing that Judaism would be the next largest religious group after Christians in WW ! America. Out of curiosity I did a search and found one source saying ~250,000 Jews had served in the WW I US Army and ~100,000 in the German Army.


https://www.geni.com/projects/Jewish...1914-1918/5453


Seems like reason enough to represent more than one religion in the monument.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2017, 11:33 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,599,424 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by legalsea View Post
For those interested, here is the actual ruling by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals:


http://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/Opinions...d/152597.P.pdf


Let us read it together, then we can speak with actual knowledge of what the Court held.
That link certainly puts the argument to rest.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2017, 11:37 AM
 
Location: NE Mississippi
25,640 posts, read 17,379,102 times
Reputation: 37407
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tonyafd View Post
All over the net. This is what I found: Judge says giant cross must be removed from San Diego mountain - CNN

If you look to the right on this web page you will see that Judge Burns was appointed by Bush.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Alan_Burns

Did you take this story and twist it around to make the Democrats look anti-Christain?
Yes. My intent was to portray Democrats in a bad light. It was fairly easy because they were guilty. Obama appointees made a bad decision.

Your cross was purchased by a private group and still stand intact today. The Ninth declared the case moot.

As you point out, there is no guarantee that Republican appointees always make conservative decisions. In the case of Judge Burns, I am betting that Trump does not nominate him for a seat on The Court of Appeals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2017, 11:43 AM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
39,321 posts, read 27,704,630 times
Reputation: 16122
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
That link certainly puts the argument to rest.

No, it doesn't. Nothing changed the fact that these people who have a problem with a 92 year old monument that honor that ww1 war dead are drama queens. lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2017, 11:48 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,599,424 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilyflower3191981 View Post
No, it doesn't. Nothing changed the fact that these people who have a problem with a 92 year old monument that honor that ww1 war dead are drama queens. lol

It helps to read the court's opinion.

Feel free to initiate a countersuit.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2017, 12:09 PM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
39,321 posts, read 27,704,630 times
Reputation: 16122
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
It helps to read the court's opinion.

Feel free to initiate a countersuit.

That picture you posted is the court's opinion?

LOL who knew?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2017, 12:24 PM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,599,424 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilyflower3191981 View Post
That picture you posted is the court's opinion?
See post #47
Quote:
LOL who knew?
LOL

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2017, 12:38 PM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
39,321 posts, read 27,704,630 times
Reputation: 16122
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
See post #47
LOL

I don't like to look at ugly men. At this point, just agree to disagree.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:06 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top