Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Actually, the Nazis were only able to rise to that level of power because they FIRST used the german Gun Registration List to first LOCATE, and CONFISCATE firearms FROM Jews , for “public safety.â€- Sound Familiar??????????????
after the gun grab came 'Kristallnacht' ; what are you naming yours ??
go back and read your history!
The Nazis rose to that level of power because they blames the economic problems that arose from World War I reparations on the Jews, and the people of Germany were happy to blame the Jews. The Jews even with arms would not have been able to overcome the German people's anti-Semitism.
LOL. It is always hilarious to me that some folks amongst us think anyone with some guns is any sort of threat to a state that has planes with bombs lol.
The Jews would have been slaughtered with or without guns in Nazi Germany since the Nazis could easily have bombed their neighborhoods or rode tanks in there and took everyone to concentration camps. You guys and your idea that guns can save you in all sorts of situations, even wars, are ridiculous.
FYI - David Karesh had guns. He and nearly everyone left in his compound were killed. The family at Ruby Ridge had guns.....
If the Jews had balls like the Australians and Brits, then they will just tuck their tails and hand the guns over.
Can you imagine anyone telling the Israelis to turn in your guns now?? They learned a little too late the importance of the humble gun.
Yet, ironically the Brits and Australians seem to have forgotten it. Even in WWII, American CIVILIANS were donating civilian hunting rifles to the Brits to give them a chance to resist the anticipated German invasion (Sealion). This after the government has taken most civilian owned rifles.
Not a bad point. Jews having arms would not have stopped the Holocaust. BUT - it would have made it much more difficult and slower for the Nazi's.
Probably not. The German people would have acted if Jews began shooting their German neighbors. This scenario is so stupid it's incredible that anyone buys this argument. It's like saying that if the US government decided to remove the Amish people, and if the Amish people fought back, that the Amish people fighting would make a dent on the US government's actions. And Americans actually like the Amish, which was not true of 1930's Germany and Jews.
Not a bad point. Jews having arms would not have stopped the Holocaust. BUT - it would have made it much more difficult and slower for the Nazi's.
How so?
German Jews were a small minority of holocaust victims, about 0.2% of the total. Vast majority of Jews were captured and murdered in other countries.
The Polish army fought the Germans with everything they had, and they did not slow them down, and nearly 3 million Jews were murdered in Poland. How the heck was a handful of German Jews with shotguns supposed to stop the Blitz?
Don't believe everything this admin wants you to believe.
Unlikely, considering that Jews were a small minority. 10 Germans with guns easily beat 1 Jewish person with a gun.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
