Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-16-2018, 12:39 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,748,172 times
Reputation: 20674

Advertisements

Here is the original 2014 study :

How the U.S. Health Care System Compares Internationally - The Commonwealth Fund

The US scored well on preventative care and wait times for specialists.

It scored poorly on :

Unhealthy lives
Efficiency
Access
Equity
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-16-2018, 12:40 PM
 
20,955 posts, read 8,674,856 times
Reputation: 14050
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
You need to thank your government for that.

Health care and banking are two heavily regulated industries. All the regulations prevent them from lowering the cost.
Then why is banking so cheap? (costs me very little for multiple bank accounts and services).
How did the government come up with a polio vaccine and make it cost little or nothing?

"In 1938, U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt, the world's most recognized victim of the disease, had founded the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis (known as March of Dimes Foundation since 2007), an organization that would fund the development of a vaccine.

In 1947, Salk accepted an appointment to the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine. In 1948, he undertook a project funded by the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis "

I'd say it has nothing to do with regulation and everything to do with corporate profits and lack of conscience. Anytime a corporation can make more money, it's acting as it should within its charter. It's the LACK of regulation that allows this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2018, 12:40 PM
 
7,736 posts, read 4,988,604 times
Reputation: 7963
tell that yo our canadian buddies that drive over the border with cash to get their surgeries completed here
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2018, 12:43 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,748,172 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brave New World View Post
The US has good quality of health care, what holds it back in relation to studies such as this is cost and access.

Universal system are always going to tank more highly in relation to access for everyone, and if that is a major criteria of this study which I suspect it is then the US is going to do as well.
Unhealthy lives was a major tanker.

That 75% of us are overweight-obese means we are substantially more vulnerable to otherwise preventable disease, Diabetes, Heart Disease, Stroke and some Cancers.

Treating these diseases cost $$$.


This is a personal responsibility issue that cannot be blamed on government, insurance, big pharma or any of the other boogymdn the masses blame for the cost of healthcare.

If a magic want could right size the US population and keep all within a healthy waist size, the Federal Government could pick up the entire tab for healthcare and spend less than it does today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2018, 12:43 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,203 posts, read 19,210,527 times
Reputation: 14910
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Joshua View Post
There are only 11 nations in the developed world?!

Did you even read your own linked report?!
OK. Have it your way, if you want. We're the worst of eleven.

Care to comment on the rest of the post...?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2018, 12:44 PM
 
Location: London
12,275 posts, read 7,140,056 times
Reputation: 13661
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
You must have never seen the glory of socialism!

What incentive the government has to treat you better? None!
The government would be much likelier to want people treated successfully. It costs them money to keep people sick, and it costs a potentially productive person (who would otherwise be able to work at a higher capacity, thus bringing in more tax dollars).

Private healthcare profits directly off of people staying sick.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2018, 12:46 PM
 
45,582 posts, read 27,196,139 times
Reputation: 23897
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
Here is the original 2014 study :

How the U.S. Health Care System Compares Internationally - The Commonwealth Fund

The US scored well on preventative care and wait times for specialists.

It scored poorly on :

Unhealthy lives
Efficiency
Access
Equity
I wonder how we scored on people from other countries bringing their sick here to cure problems that couldn't be done in their own countries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2018, 12:47 PM
 
Location: City Data Land
17,155 posts, read 12,962,522 times
Reputation: 33185
"U.S. Health Care Ranked Worst in the Developed World"

said OP to no one's surprise
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2018, 12:49 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,748,172 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drewjdeg View Post
So you want to pay more instead of less? The system we have now doesn't work.

What's the biggest cost for small businesses in America? Healthcare.

The perpetual conservative fantasy of a market based healthcare system actually hurts the small business they claim to care about.
There is no such thing as market based healthcare, anywhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2018, 12:49 PM
 
Location: North Carolina
6,957 posts, read 8,493,779 times
Reputation: 6777
Martin Shkreli, the guy who will be going to jail for selling Daraprim at extortionist pricing, was perhaps the most honest ...as to why it cost so much. When asked why the price of Daraprim rose from $13 to $750 a pill, he said "Because we can!". It's just pure, unmitigated greed! The other CEOs may couch it in different terms, but essentially they agree with that sentiment. "We'll squeeze whatever we can out of any patient until someone stops us", seems to be their modus operandi.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:47 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top