Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The particulars don't interest me that much. The big picture does though. We most certainly have a multi tier Justice system where everyone is not treated the same.
It would be cool to think that this lawsuit could change that but it won't.
This lawsuit will go nowhere.
And it's not a good case to assert a two-tier system. The sailor took pictures with the clear intent to share them with someone who wasn't authorized to see them. Secretary Clinton had no intention of sharing information with persons not authorized to see them. A significant difference.
And it's not a good case to assert a two-tier system. The sailor took pictures with the clear intent to share them with someone who wasn't authorized to see them. Secretary Clinton had no intention of sharing information with persons not authorized to see them. A significant difference.
We all know servers and email servers can be hacked. There is a reason they don't want servers and emails outside the building. How do they know you or the people you hire knows what they are doing? If what you said was true, then you are calling Hillary a dumb ass.
A friend works in a place where he has to get a gov't clearance. He is not allowed to remove anything from that building. He is also not allowed to use his interoffice email to communicate outside the building. Also no cell phones or other electronics are brought into the building. If he did and was caught, he would be fired immediately and potentially jailed. I can't believe you guys are buying into their lie.
And it's not a good case to assert a two-tier system. The sailor took pictures with the clear intent to share them with someone who wasn't authorized to see them. Secretary Clinton had no intention of sharing information with persons not authorized to see them. A significant difference.
This is the case in a nutshell. He even admitted that he knew he was wrong to take the photos in the first place.
Still, the judge went easy on him and he did his time. This is political theatre, nothing more.
Trump et al cannot go after Clinton again because there's nothing to go after, so this is what they pull.
It will not work.
Ask anyone who ever served.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
The lives of our undercover intelligence officers abroad often hang in the balance, and a well-kept secret is the difference between an officer coming home and going to a gulag. Likewise, spy operations can take years, if not decades, to put into action. But that's ok, Hillary is special, and we don't need to concern ourselves with her GROSS negligence
Wasn’t the basis for Hillary not getting punished that there was no ill “intention?”
That’s such a slippery slope and needs to be looked at again legally. As clearly this guy had no ill intention with his photos, but Hillary’s intention of destroying evidence, obstructing Justice , skews on the wrong side if you looked at it with an unbiased legal eye.
No....the basis was Comey conspired with others to exonerate her even though he was fully aware she had violated federal law.
He rewrote the statute in his mind, and proceeded with this fake definition of the statute that somehow now miraculously included "intent" as an element of the offense (news flash...the real statute does not).
He is guilty and needs to be locked up. Along with both Clintons and all of those involved in exonerating her.
The sailor took pictures with the clear intent to share them with someone who wasn't authorized to see them.
Sorry, but under the law governing classified information, the sailor's intent doesn't matter. If he took classified information (such as pictures of the inside of a nuclear submarine) and handled them improperly, he gets prosecuted. Doesn't matter what he "intended" with them.
Quote:
Secretary Clinton had no intention of sharing information with persons not authorized to see them. A significant difference.
Sorry, but under the law governing classified information, her intent doesn't matter. If she took classified information (such as classified e-mails about sensitive subjects) and handled them improperly, she gets prosecuted. Doesn't matter what she "intended" with them.
Except, the sailor got jailed. And Hillary didn't.
Despite the fact that their crimes were nearly identical.
Except that Hillary abused far more classified information than the sailor did.
And the idea that the Secretary of State didn't know what she was doing was illegal, is absurd.
And it's not a good case to assert a two-tier system. The sailor took pictures with the clear intent to share them with someone who wasn't authorized to see them. Secretary Clinton had no intention of sharing information with persons not authorized to see them. A significant difference.
Hillary asked her maid to print and deliver some of these classified emails......The maid said she didn’t read any of them.....really?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
