Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There is no comparison, he knowingly took an action that he knew was against regulations, Clinton’s actions were negligent. A better comparison would have been General Petreaus providing secret information but then he wouldn’t be able to get the attention of the rabid right by chanting “Hillary”.
Good luck with the lawsuit, is he paying out of pocket or is it some right wing group.
"Clinton’s actions were negligent." RIGHT!
Explain HOW setting up her PRIVATE server which she used for ALL of her gov't business was "negligent.
She set up ON PURPOSE, NOT by accident.
She was given one on one instructions on how to handle classified material, probably NOT the FIRST time, and IGNORED ALL OF IT.
The problem for him will be that he was found guilty- therefor this passes the bar of being a merited investigation/prosecution. He was a also convicted this being a crime for a service member. There are plenty of actions that will get you in trouble with the military that carry no risk for civilians.
Clinton is guilty of stupidity while this guy acted against something he knew was against policy.
And I still can't figure out how anyone in their right mind thinks the President (any President) has the time to personally spearhead who is/is not singled out for investigation and trial.
"Clinton is guilty of stupidity while this guy acted against something he knew was against policy."
If you robbed a bank and your partner gets killed, you had no intent to see anyone get killed but still, you are charged with murder.
Not the same thing. I would know I was doing wrong when I robbed the bank.
Hillary didn't know that a private server was wrong. She asked other Secretaries of State what they had done, and she made a choice that she thought was the best choice. It wasn't. But again, there is zero evidence that her bad choice had bad consequences. There is zero evidence national security was compromised. ZERO evidence.
You'd have to be stupid to believe a former First Lady and Secretary Of State didn't know what classified meant....
Its like saying a murder didn't know that shooting someone in the head would harm them....
Stupid are the people who think that as First Lady she had e-mail. Times have changed, grasshopper. The fact that you don't remember the 1990's isn't Clinton's fault.
Not the same thing. I would know I was doing wrong when I robbed the bank.
Hillary knew what she was doing was wrong.
Quote:
Hillary didn't know that a private server was wrong.
Yes she did.
Quote:
She asked other Secretaries of State what they had done, and she made a choice that she thought was the best choice. It wasn't. But again, there is zero evidence that her bad choice had bad consequences. There is zero evidence national security was compromised. ZERO evidence.
She made a ton of bad choices yet was still the nominee.
she made a choice that she thought was the best choice.
Hillary decided that breaking the law, mishandling classified information, putting it on a nonsecure server in a privately-owned building, was the "best choice"?
Two tiered justice....finally white folks seeing what people of color have known for years.
its not just white people, but people in positions of power as well. the rich and powerful, regardless of race, are usually handled with kid gloves since they have the wherewithal to get things done, unless the government is making a specific target of these people, like bernie madoff for instance.
so in reality our justice system is not a two tiered system but rather multi tiered.
And it's not a good case to assert a two-tier system. The sailor took pictures with the clear intent to share them with someone who wasn't authorized to see them. Secretary Clinton had no intention of sharing information with persons not authorized to see them. A significant difference.
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both
Comey's suggestion that Clinton needed to do more than store this information on an unauthorized server is simply Comey covering for Clinton as part of a larger conspiracy to avoid charging her with violation of federal law.
Weaponized gov. backlash, Pardoned sailor to sue Obama, DOJ, FBI & others. Wants two-tier justice system corrected.]
So does that mean he all so wants trump tried becuase he gave top secret info to the russians about Isreal?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
