Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Was this site hosted by Wordpress or self hosted? I would imagine the former but checking.
It was hosted on Wordpress.com.
Wordpress.com is Wordpress' paid hosting solution
If someone wants the Wordpress software, they can download it free at Wordpress.org and host it elsewhere.
The left is shutting the right down all over the internet and there isn't a damn thing the right can do about it. The concept of private ownership rights is biting it's own proponents right in the ass. I don't like to see it, but there is a poetic irony to it all.
It was hosted on Wordpress.com.
Wordpress.com is Wordpress' paid hosting solution
If someone wants the Wordpress software, they can download it free at Wordpress.org and host it elsewhere.
Yup, I am familiar. Just making sure I get the details on which it was since there is a definite difference.
Net Neut would have regulated the ISPs to some extent. At some point, the government would feel the need to monitor the bandwidth, so then they install equipment in the "pipes" to measure the data. Once they get their mits on the bandwidth, do you think it's a stretch for them to start blocking certain content? That will affect the entirety of the US internet and makes them equivalent to leaders in China and Iran.
Only in right-wing conspiracy land. SCOTUS would never allow that if it was to even be attempted. And from what you've posted here, it's clear you don't know how the Internet works.
It's unsettling that people who don't even know how the Internet works or what net neutrality actually is are deciding national policy on it.
Only in right-wing conspiracy land. SCOTUS would never allow that if it was to even be attempted. And from what you've posted here, it's clear you don't know how the Internet works.
It's unsettling that people who don't even know how the Internet works or what net neutrality actually is are deciding national policy on it.
Just like the 20 old men meeting to figure out the details on Women's health. What else is new?
Don't worry - they have lobbyists and loud-mouthed Right Wing radio and TV hosts to educate them....all will be well.
Only in right-wing conspiracy land. SCOTUS would never allow that if it was to even be attempted. And from what you've posted here, it's clear you don't know how the Internet works.
It's unsettling that people who don't even know how the Internet works or what net neutrality actually is are deciding national policy on it.
I know who THEY are.
So you would be against the government blocking content from the Fellowship of the Minds (for example)?
So you would be against the government blocking content from the Fellowship of the Minds (for example)?
Yes. ISPs shouldn't have the right to block it either. Now private enterprises like Facebook, YouTube, etc are a different story and they should be able to control what kind of content they host if they so choose.
Yes. ISPs shouldn't have the right to block it either. Now private enterprises like Facebook, YouTube, etc are a different story and they should be able to control what kind of content they host if they so choose.
OK - I actually agree with that.
One more thing - where did I get the internet wrong?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
