Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-18-2018, 03:24 PM
 
25,447 posts, read 9,813,207 times
Reputation: 15338

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by westcoastforme View Post
Hate? What hate?

In any case “hate speech” is free speech!
It may be free speech, but evidently these social media platforms don't cotton to that. Sorry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-18-2018, 03:26 PM
 
25,447 posts, read 9,813,207 times
Reputation: 15338
Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener2307 View Post
It already has. That's why there are so many Foxaphobes.
And that's why polls haven't been right and don't tell the story. Liberals won't win. Silencing the truth is what they accuse The Right of doing, but that's just projection.
No matter how much anyone on this thread posts the reason why Jones was banned, many on the right will absolutely refuse to acknowledge it. It's amazing really.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2018, 03:27 PM
 
25,447 posts, read 9,813,207 times
Reputation: 15338
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4dognight View Post
So are you saying that FB YT, and all other social media websites research each and every comment and come to the correct conclusion as to which are lies and which are truth?

Of course they don't. So your argument doesn't fly. You just happen to disagree with the posts of those that the radical leftists who run those media have banned.

If they banned Hellary ,Barry , Moochelle, Ayers, Farrakhan or some radical leftists faves the left would accuse them of banning the truth, which is a lie.
If they violate terms of service, then yes, they should be banned too. Hate speech. He was banned for hate speech. This seems to be a very hard idea for many to grasp.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2018, 03:29 PM
 
25,447 posts, read 9,813,207 times
Reputation: 15338
Quote:
Originally Posted by AguaDulce View Post
I know many who don't believe that hate speech is protected speech.
Private companies have a right to ban hate speech if they so choose.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2018, 03:31 PM
 
7,687 posts, read 5,122,942 times
Reputation: 5482
Quote:
Originally Posted by AguaDulce View Post
I know many who don't believe that hate speech is protected speech.
They be 1,000,000% wrong

And SCOTUS has said so




They can cry and scream and kick their feet all they want but they will always lose
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2018, 03:31 PM
 
7,293 posts, read 4,097,756 times
Reputation: 4670
Quote:
Originally Posted by trobesmom View Post
Private companies have a right to ban hate speech if they so choose.
Absolutely, but I was responding to something else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2018, 03:31 PM
 
Location: Just over the horizon
18,461 posts, read 7,094,796 times
Reputation: 11707
Quote:
Originally Posted by AguaDulce View Post
If you agree to terms and conditions when you enter into a relationship with a company and then violate said terms and conditions you are liable to get bumped.

Completely different scenario.


When you are hired on with a company, you agree to the terms and conditions of employment and the projection of the company image.

So the NFL should be able to fine or fire a player who kneels for the anthem then?

Or Hobby Lobby should be able to fire employees protesting against them not covering birth control?

Exactly what part of social media terms and conditions exclude the expression of Conservative viewpoint?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2018, 03:32 PM
 
25,447 posts, read 9,813,207 times
Reputation: 15338
Quote:
Originally Posted by AguaDulce View Post
Absolutely, but I was responding to something else.
Oops sorry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2018, 03:32 PM
 
7,293 posts, read 4,097,756 times
Reputation: 4670
The First Amendment protects you from the government punishing or censoring or oppressing your speech. It doesn't apply to private organizations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2018, 03:33 PM
 
7,687 posts, read 5,122,942 times
Reputation: 5482
Quote:
Originally Posted by trobesmom View Post
If they violate terms of service, then yes, they should be banned too. Hate speech. He was banned for hate speech. This seems to be a very hard idea for many to grasp.
So what “hate speech” was Alex banned for?

Still trying to figure that out
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:26 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top