Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Hillary sat there for hours on end in her lovely lime green pantsuit soaking up all the long winded praises heaped on her by her Democrat colleges. Once in a while a Rep would ask her a semi tough question which she would simply shrug off much to the delight of her comrades to the left.
Why do you keep acting as if all of us liberals were about Clinton? Don't you remember Bernie Sanders?
Ailes and Murdoch were a match made in hell, they along with the Koch boys have done more damage to this nation than any "foreign" adversary has ever managed to do.
If not for those two POS, Republicans would not be the party of hate and fear. Instead our nation would have truely become that "shining city on a hill".....
but instead we got Trump Ryan Mitch Sessions. a fool, a libertarian, a racist and a racist.
So you are ok with a whining, screaming boor, who could be guilty of sexual assault,
and who apparently exhibited outrageous, aggressive behavior earlier in his life, being a SCOTUS???????
I didn't go back and read what I replied but I'm pretty sure it was nothing to that effect?
The Havard students and alumni protest worked since he will not return.
He lied about terms like Dev*l's Triangle.
Kavanaugh said under OATH that he first learned of Ramirez's allegations in the New Yorker yet the FBI has text messages that shows he was in contact with her friends to support him.
He referred to himself and friends as obnoxious drunks in 1983.
His credibility is gone. But what do we expect if Trump picked him?
You lefties don't even try to keep up do you. Prove your claim he lied under oath. I will give you a hint, you can't because you are wrong. Read his actual testimony, not what the leftwing MSM tells you it said. Intellectual honesty will set you free of these shackles you so happily inhabit.
Republican held well over 100 judicial seats open and empty until you guys could stack them. And worst Republicans left the SCOTUS with an empty seat for over a year just to stop Obama appointing someone.
so PLEASE don't give us any 11th hour bs, if a year is not too long neither is a couple of extra weeks.
This all happened after Obama finished ramming through the Affordable Care Act with questionable methods, and after Obama skirted Congress entirely on:
Iran deal, the JCPOA;
Paris Climate Accords; and
DACA.
Whilte I am not a Republican, they weren't going to be played for fools again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by evilcart
you know what this is about just as well as we do. Trump wants to put his thug in power so that his thug can protect trump when he and his buddies are impeached. And Trump does not give a damn about the quality of the person he uses as his tool. Brett is not a good pick for the US SC.
2 Of Brett Kavanaugh’s Former Classmates Withdraw Support For Him
Two former Yale law school classmates of Brett Kavanaugh’s who previously vouched for him wrote to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday to say they are withdrawing their support for him because of “the nature” of his recent testimony.
...the lack of judicial temperament displayed on September 27 hearing, cause us to withdraw our support.”
“The reason for our withdrawal is not the truth or falsity of Dr. Ford’s allegations, which are still being investigated, but rather was the nature of Judge Kavanaugh’s testimony,” they write. “In our view that testimony was partisan, and not judicious, and inconsistent with what we expect from a Justice of the Supreme Court, particularly when dealing with a co-equal branch of government.”
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,477 posts, read 12,487,658 times
Reputation: 10442
Quote:
Originally Posted by katzpaw
2 Of Brett Kavanaugh’s Former Classmates Withdraw Support For Him
Two former law school classmates of Brett Kavanaugh’s who previously vouched for him wrote to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday to say they are withdrawing their support for him because of “the nature” of his recent testimony.
...the lack of judicial temperament displayed on September 27 hearing, cause us to withdraw our support.”
“The reason for our withdrawal is not the truth or falsity of Dr. Ford’s allegations, which are still being investigated, but rather was the nature of Judge Kavanaugh’s testimony,” they write. “In our view that testimony was partisan, and not judicious, and inconsistent with what we expect from a Justice of the Supreme Court, particularly when dealing with a co-equal branch of government.”
Had they first proved that they had been supporting him? Or, are they just wanting to see their name in print?
They are not wanting a drunkard and a liar on the supreme court.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
