How is a SCOTUS judge who enjoys beer a national disaster but a POTUS who admitted to doing cocaine was no big deal? (impeachment, Kennedy)

[RedZin]

It's not about the beer, that's how.

It's about lying about the beer, displaying blatantly partisan behavior, and becoming belligerent during a job interview.

Oh, and the possibility that he sexually assaulted someone.

None of these things are part of what most intelligent, country before party folks think of as "conduct becoming a Supreme Court Justice."

[HockeyMac18]

Originally Posted by Moth

Yes I am sure you needed the smelling salts after that.

We all knew what he thought, he just confirmed it live on TV. Even dropped a "but Hillary!!" (Seriously, dude?? Lol....).

I wasn't shocked one bit, but it did confirm my suspicions that he is a bad pick.

[Moth]

Originally Posted by HockeyMac18

We all knew what he thought, he just confirmed it live on TV. Even dropped a "but Hillary!!" (Seriously, dude?? Lol....).

I wasn't shocked one bit, but it did confirm my suspicions that he is a bad pick.

You break them under your nose and they reverse the effects of fainting.

[HockeyMac18]

Originally Posted by Moth

You break them under your nose and they reverse the effects of fainting.

Uh huh.

I already knew this tool was getting confirmed weeks ago, and I haven't changed my feeling on this at any point. Your response is strange...I know you're trying to be cute, but you're not even picking a good target.

[ColdAilment]

Originally Posted by MacInTx

Let's understand what Mr Trump said. From the unedited transcript https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/08/u...ranscript.html...


"You can do anything. Grab ’em by the *****. You can do anything."


He did not say, "I have grabbed..."


Not exactly an admission, in the Bill Clinton sense of "It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is..."

Also, "just kiss, don't even wait" if that's not admissible guilt in sexual assault I don't know what is.

[jimazee]

...another ridiculous thread. (Before someone posts a snarky comment on why I read it... I skipped from page 2 to here... one page too late. )

[Ceece]

Originally Posted by cchampagne232000

So many misstatements in one post.

List them and I'll recant

[Quick Enough]

Originally Posted by RedZin

It's not about the beer, that's how.

It's about lying about the beer, displaying blatantly partisan behavior, and becoming belligerent during a job interview.

Oh, and the possibility that he sexually assaulted someone.

None of these things are part of what most intelligent, country before party folks think of as "conduct becoming a Supreme Court Justice."

"It's about lying about the beer,"


He did NOT lie ab out drinking beer, sometimes a lot of beer.


"Oh, and the possibility that he sexually assaulted someone."


"the possibility" And THAT IS IT in a nutshell.


NOT 1 SINGLE "witness" supported the allegations made. NOT A ONE.


Anybody could say, "it's POSSIBLE YOU are a sex pervert."


Now DISPROVE IT.

[TheMoreYouKnow]

Originally Posted by RedZin

It's not about the beer, that's how.

It's about lying about the beer, displaying blatantly partisan behavior, and becoming belligerent during a job interview.

Oh, and the possibility that he sexually assaulted someone.

None of these things are part of what most intelligent, country before party folks think of as "conduct becoming a Supreme Court Justice."

[Vector1]

Originally Posted by vacoder

Becuase a POTUS is voted in by the people. an SC is not. SMH. what a dumb thread

No personal offense, but your comment is absurd on several levels.

For starters, it is the potus and no one else who makes the decisions to nominate federal judges to the bench, including the highest court.
So in essence the people are voting for which direction the court will go in from a judicial philosophy standpoint.
More importantly, most presidents, especially those who serve two terms, will have more than one scotus pick.
Therefore a potus is even more important than any once scotus pick because they may get two or more.

Thus the OP's thread is not dumb, and instead points out once again how the left are hypocrites because they just want to resist Trump by any and every means necessary. The people voted for Trump, and Trump nominated Kavanaugh, ergo the people voted for him as well.
If you don't believe it, just look at the polling how most (R's) want Kavanaugh confirmed, and most (D's) do not.

Playing politics is one thing, but debasing ones self by despicable tactics and ruining a persons life in the process, is only something the vile leftists engage in when it comes to the scotus. They started this when the party started to lose it's moral fiber back when they assissnated judge Bork's reputation to try and keep Reagans pick off the scotus. Then they tried it again with judge Thomas. These are historical facts you cannot deny. But as bad as those two were, the (d's) and their current crop of leftist loons have sunk to a new low with all the rubbish they have pulled from day one of this nomination.

I'd be ashamed to be a Democrat today if my party pulled this crap.
For those who aren't, you probably have no shame and certainly no honor!


`