Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-12-2018, 05:11 PM
 
9,329 posts, read 4,145,575 times
Reputation: 8224

Advertisements

I've read that, too, that Dems have turned away - but, still, it's better than the way Republicans have always been focused on the wealthy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-12-2018, 05:23 PM
 
Location: New York
2,486 posts, read 825,912 times
Reputation: 1883
Quote:
Originally Posted by lovecrowds View Post
https://thehill.com/homenews/state-w...mocratic-party

I thought it was interesting and the truth.

The Democrats have abandoned America's construction, warehouse, miners, farmers and ranchers in exchange for illegal aliens, welfare cheats, inner-city out of wedlock women who have large families from men who are parolees and drug dealers.

The Democrats certainly had more to offer platform wise a generation or two ago as opposed to what their disgraceful platform is today.

Odd how the very regions that voted for them a generation or two, don't want much to do with them anymore.
Which has always been the party of separation and division?

Before the 60s they were the southern Dems and KKK members. They WERE the White Supremacists.

Then, with the outcry from the public against lynchings and white cops beating blacks in the streets, they seemingly changed overnight.

Johnson took credit for the 1964 Civil Rights Act, however that was begun by Kennedy who, to the dismay of the party, was absolutely for civil equality.

The Dems still take credit, yet:


The original House version:[22]
  • Democratic Party: 152–96 (61–39%)
  • Republican Party: 138–34 (80–20%)
Cloture in the Senate:[23]
  • Democratic Party: 44–23 (66–34%)
  • Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)
The Senate version:[22]
  • Democratic Party: 46–21 (69–31%)
  • Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)
The Senate version, voted on by the House:[22]
  • Democratic Party: 153–91 (63–37%)
  • Republican Party: 136–35 (80–20%)
The Dems could barely muster 2/3rds of their party to pass it. More than 80% of Republicans passed it in both the House and Senate. So, in all honesty, it was passed by a large majority of Republicans.

Fast forward 50 years - now the Dems have gone from being white supremacists to calling all Republicans racists. All their eggs are, have always been, in the basket of division. They NEED the black, Hispanic and women's vote. If they lose even a small percentage of them, the party will be lost.

This is why they have become so hostile to Kanye West, who has clearly escaped the plantation of urban exploitation.

The Dems abandoned "America's construction, warehouse, miners, farmers and ranchers" when Clinton passed NAFTA. They knew what the end result would be when they passed it. I blame both parties for that one.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarallel View Post
I've read that, too, that Dems have turned away - but, still, it's better than the way Republicans have always been focused on the wealthy.
If this is the case, how is it the Dems always get twice as many donations from the wealthy? Seems to me that would be counterproductive. If Republicans focused on the wealthy, there would be no Billionaires with a D.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2018, 06:40 PM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,541,024 times
Reputation: 25816
Any union manager that votes republican must not be paying attention.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2018, 09:20 PM
 
10,513 posts, read 5,170,583 times
Reputation: 14056
The progressive wing of the Democratic Party is focused like a laser beam on the blue collar working and middle class:
  • Medicare For All
  • Affordable debt-free college for the academically qualified
  • A living wage of at least $15/hr so anyone working fulltime can support themselves
This is a winning platform.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2018, 09:27 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,654,236 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
Any union manager that votes republican must not be paying attention.
To what they have been told?
Or what they figured out on their own?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2018, 09:28 PM
 
34,068 posts, read 17,096,341 times
Reputation: 17215
Quote:
Originally Posted by lovecrowds View Post
https://thehill.com/homenews/state-w...mocratic-party

I thought it was interesting and the truth.

The Democrats have abandoned America's construction, warehouse, miners, farmers and ranchers in exchange for illegal aliens, welfare cheats, inner-city out of wedlock women who have large families from men who are parolees and drug dealers.

The Democrats certainly had more to offer platform wise a generation or two ago as opposed to what their disgraceful platform is today.

Odd how the very regions that voted for them a generation or two, don't want much to do with them anymore.
They are no longer a mainstream party. Very sad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2018, 09:55 PM
 
32,074 posts, read 15,077,213 times
Reputation: 13697
Quote:
Originally Posted by lovecrowds View Post
https://thehill.com/homenews/state-w...mocratic-party

I thought it was interesting and the truth.

The Democrats have abandoned America's construction, warehouse, miners, farmers and ranchers in exchange for illegal aliens, welfare cheats, inner-city out of wedlock women who have large families from men who are parolees and drug dealers.

The Democrats certainly had more to offer platform wise a generation or two ago as opposed to what their disgraceful platform is today.

Odd how the very regions that voted for them a generation or two, don't want much to do with them anymore.
Construction workers are alive a well under LIUNA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2018, 10:01 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
25,573 posts, read 56,497,864 times
Reputation: 23386
Quote:
Originally Posted by Originalist View Post
Which has always been the party of separation and division?

Before the 60s they were the southern Dems and KKK members. They WERE the White Supremacists.

Then, with the outcry from the public against lynchings and white cops beating blacks in the streets, they seemingly changed overnight.

Johnson took credit for the 1964 Civil Rights Act, however that was begun by Kennedy who, to the dismay of the party, was absolutely for civil equality.

The Dems still take credit, yet:

The original House version:[22]
  • Democratic Party: 152–96 (61–39%)
  • Republican Party: 138–34 (80–20%)
Cloture in the Senate:[23]
  • Democratic Party: 44–23 (66–34%)
  • Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)
The Senate version:[22]
  • Democratic Party: 46–21 (69–31%)
  • Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)
The Senate version, voted on by the House:[22]
  • Democratic Party: 153–91 (63–37%)
  • Republican Party: 136–35 (80–20%)
The Dems could barely muster 2/3rds of their party to pass it. More than 80% of Republicans passed it in both the House and Senate. So, in all honesty, it was passed by a large majority of Republicans.
Horse Hockey - typical GOP lies and misrepresentation.

Today's Republican party ARE the Democratic party of the 50's and 60's. All the hatred and bigotry you ascribe existed then now belongs to the GOP because that's where the whites of the old Democratic party moved to.

The Democrats you say were opposed to the Civil Rights Act ARE today's Republican party.

Ever hear of the Southern Strategy?

Quote:
In American politics, the Southern strategy refers to a Republican Party electoral strategy to increase political support among white voters in the South by appealing to racism against African Americans.[1][2][3] As the civil rights movement and dismantling of Jim Crow laws in the 1950s and 1960s visibly deepened existing racial tensions in much of the Southern United States, Republican politicians such as presidential candidate Richard Nixon and Senator Barry Goldwater developed strategies that successfully contributed to the political realignment of many white, conservative voters in the South who had traditionally supported the Democratic Party rather than the Republican Party.[4] It also helped to push the Republican Party much more to the right.[4]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:35 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top