Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegabern
Oh, that's rich.
|
I spit my lunch all over my keyboard when I read that! LOl
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4dognight
The other leftist journalist in the room ask tough questions. Jimbo is a shill who wants to debate and scream out his opinion. Acosta is an attention prostitute, among other things.
|
Your paragraph makes no sense. Are you saying there is another "leftist journalist" in the White House press room? If Jim Acosta is a shill, what is he selling? And how does asking questions of the president result in being an "attention prostitute"? How else do you get the president to answer your questions, other than getting his attention?
Curious ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by augiedogie
Cancel press briefings and put out press releases. Interviews given only to journalists and others who ask fair questions and are not abusive. CNN might have hire some new people.
|
Who defines "fair"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corrie22
Judge has no authority over the White House.....
|
Perhaps you're not familiar with the checks and balances system that is one of the bedrocks of the federal government.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATX Wahine
You are making patently untrue claims here. The judge restored his pass temporarily on the grounds that he did not receive due process. The Constitition isn’t really involved in that decision. The White House has rules that must be followed to revoke a press pass and they didn’t follow them. That’s what was decided. Not any 1A issues.
|
Due process is a Constitutional issue, but others have argued that truth better than I can.
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751
This is all about Acosta making a name for himself lol.
|
He made a name for himself a long time ago. Where have you been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751
Well if so he took his cue from liberals who every day throw temper tantrums, and insult people. Democrats don't like it when people fight back obviously. Trump is supposed to cower and take the abuse.
|
Trump throws his own tantrums and insults reporters on almost a daily basis. Sometimes you need to fight fire with fire - or, in Trump's case, bring yourself down to his level.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OpinionInOcala
In fact, it was Mr. Acosta's recent actions that actively prevented other members of the Free Press from exercising their rights and executing their duties on the behalf of both their employers and the American People..
|
He did not stop any other reporters from asking questions; as has been documented already, plenty of other reporters asked questions - and follow-up questions - during that press conference.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454
Since when is someone entitled access to the White Hoise?
|
When they present their credentials from a legitimate news organization and satisfy the White House's background checks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scooby Snacks
A person has freedom of speech in most situations but they do not have the automatic right to enter most buildings without invitation and report on anything they want to. They must be asked to come in.
|
See above.
When I was in college, I interned in Washington one summer through a journalism think tank that no longer exists. I worked at the State Department, the White House, and the Capitol. The first time I attended press briefings at the State Department and the White House, I had to present my credentials and a boatload of personal information I forget how many days ahead of time, and wait for approval. This was in addition to the information I had to supply to each department as part of my internship application, which I know was supplied to the White House but I'm not sure about the others.
I was not asked to come in; I asked for approval to come in.
Likewise, when presidents Reagan and Bush 41 came to the town in which I was working as a member of the press, I had to gain clearance ahead of time by supplying voluminous documents and presenting my professional credentials in order to be in the press pool.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hellion1999
people calm down......this was temporary. The Judge still has to rule on the case and explain how Acosta's free speech and due process were violated which he hasn't done. Once he opens up to that the SC will overturn him.
|
The Supreme Court won't give this the time of day. If I'm wrong, I'll acknowledge that when the time comes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chowhound
The reporters are there to "report" not have a dialog/debate.
|
Asking questions and follow-up questions often does lead to debate. It's the nature of the business.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FatBob96
The Free Press portion of the First Amendment doesn't guarantee access to the President.
If that were the case, then thousands of journalists across the country could sue , claiming their rights are being violated because they aren't granted access.
|
Any journalist can request access to the White House press corps. It's not likely that a reporter from the Small Town Times will gain access, but anyone can
ask.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redraven
Then acosta should be seated in the back of the room. He should NEVER be given a microphone again. He should never be called upon to ask a question. He should never be responded to in any way, not even if his shirt is on fire. ALL CNN flaks should join him in the back row. If any of them stands up before the press conference is finished, they should be told by the Secret Service to "Sit down and shut up or leave the room!"
No, I do not believe the President (or anybody else) has any duty under the Constitution or any of the Amendments to recognize their existence in any way.
|
The president and his/her staff have the duty to treat each reporter equally. Your scenario does nothing of the sort.
Quote:
Originally Posted by eqttrdr
At least Acosta should respect the OFFICE if not the man
His actions disrespect the OFFICE of the POTUS and exactly why he shouldn't be permanently banned
|
At least the president should respect the REPORTER if not the man.
The president's actions disrespect the REPORTER.
See how that works?
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent
The Department of Labor should file charges against Acosta. It's a violation of US Labor Law for a male to use physical force/intimidation to prevent a female from doing her job.
|
OMG, give it up already. You're embarrassing yourself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeutralParty
Someone is #Triggered
|
LMAO!