Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
House voted unanimously, 420 - 0, to make the Mueller report public. literally EVERY SINGLE House Republican voted yes to make it public.
So why did McConnell block it on the Senate?
Trump has been exonerated, right? After it's been scrubbed for all classified intel and grand jury info removed, don't President Trump and all the C-D supporters want the entire report to be made public?
House voted unanimously, 420 - 0, to make the Mueller report public. literally EVERY SINGLE House Republican voted yes to make it public.
So why did McConnell block it on the Senate?
Trump has been exonerated, right? After it's been scrubbed for all classified intel and grand jury info removed, don't President Trump and all the C-D supporters want the entire report to be made public?
It seems that McConnell wants no part of it out in the public. He already knows that the House should see the report.
...it would be a lot easier if you would just read Barr's reportBarr goes into great depth explaining it over many paragraphs...could not be clearer ...even a 3 year old can understand it
"Based on my discussions with the Special Counsel and my initial review, it is apparent that the report contains material that is or could be subject to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e), which imposes restrictions on the use and disclosure of information relating to “matter[s] occurring before [a] grand jury.” Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(2)(B). Rule 6(e) generally limits disclosure of certain grand jury information in a criminal investigation and prosecution. Id. Disclosure of 6(e) material beyond the strict limits set forth in the rule is a crime in certain circumstances. See, e.g., 18 U.S.C. § 401(3). This restriction protects the integrity of grand jury proceedings and ensures that the unique and invaluable investigative powers of a grand jury are used strictly for their intended criminal justice function.
Given these restrictions, the schedule for processing the report depends in part on how quickly the Department can identify the 6(e) material that by law cannot be made public. I have requested the assistance of the Special Counsel in identifying all 6(e) information contained in the report as quickly as possible. Separately, I also must identify any information that could impact other ongoing matters, including those that the Special Counsel has referred to other offices. As soon as that process is complete, I will be in a position to move forward expeditiously in determining what can be released in light of applicable law, regulations, and Departmental policies."
I'm not questioning the fact that part of the report needs to be redacted including certain grand jury testimony and continuing investigations, aside from that there is no reason for releasing the entire report after screening.
I'm not questioning the fact that part of the report needs to be redacted including certain grand jury testimony and continuing investigations, aside from that there is no reason for releasing the entire report after screening.
The entire unredacted report should go to House and Senate Intelligence committee's.
I'm not questioning the fact that part of the report needs to be redacted including certain grand jury testimony and continuing investigations, aside from that there is no reason for releasing the entire report after screening.
Then that's not the entire report is it?..you keep saying entire report....and again, if you would actually read Barr's report...you would know he intends to do that
" Disclosure of 6(e) material beyond the strict limits set forth in the rule is a crime"
Barr knows his audience...and went into great detail over several paragraphs explaining the process....using baby talk...not legalese..so even the most dim witted would understand
Funny how they are silent , after running their mouths constantly about Trump colluding with Russia for years .
—-
Democrats running for president in 2020 would not answer questions regarding the results of special counsel Robert Mueller after multiple inquiries from The Daily Caller News Foundation.
Mueller, who submitted his completed report on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election Friday, did not find any collusion between President Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia.
In review, The Daily Caller is a strongly right leaning news and opinion website that has been involved with publishing controversial and false stories. For example, they routinely publish misleading or false information regarding climate change that goes against the consensus of science. The Daily Caller has also published articles by Jason Kessler, a white supremacist who organized a rally of hundreds of white nationalists in Charlottesville. They subsequently scrubbed those articles after the Charlottesville vehicular homicide incident.
It seems that McConnell wants no part of it out in the public. He already knows that the House should see the report.
Yeah, I am confused why so many repubs are still against the report being released. /sarcasm
I imagine House dems will be able to get their hands on the report eventually.
Dems are also expected to subpoena Robert Mueller within the next month or two. Who better to hear from than the man who report the report? Not the biased AG or partisan congressmen and women.
I'd like to see Mueller be asked very direct questions about his report.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.