Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
i could never figure out why advertisers raise so much hell over a spoken word, when hulu drop laura over her talking about parkland dude school of choice. that when I drop hulu. dont really miss them.
I agree and understand your concern too. Unfortnately we are all a part of the society in which the political correctness on which the liberals have pushed upon us, is now an overwhelming and growing force to be reckon with. It's a fine line that all of us, not just Fox News or even Chelsea Clinton have to live with.
Questioning how someone wearing a Hijab can support the constitution is not really in the grey area of political correctness, it is blatantly racist.
If this keeps on, the only advertiser left on Fox News will be that "my pillow guy!"
Why is corporate America trying harder and harder to demonstrate their liberalism? I don't have any problem with anything Pirro or Tucker have said. Part of this may be the narrow minded liberal pressure to boycott any company that remotely disagrees with them on even a single issue, like David Hogg has advocated for.
Why is corporate America trying harder and harder to demonstrate their liberalism? I don't have any problem with anything Pirro or Tucker have said. Part of this may be the narrow minded liberal pressure to boycott any company that remotely disagrees with them on even a single issue, like David Hogg has advocated for.
Questioning how someone wearing a Hijab can support the constitution is not really in the grey area of political correctness, it is blatantly racist.
How is it racist? It is a RELIGIOUS issue, and Pirro was pointing out that adherence to the Muslim religion and hence Sharia Law goes against the U.S. Constitution. She's right!
Why is corporate America trying harder and harder to demonstrate their liberalism? I don't have any problem with anything Pirro or Tucker have said. Part of this may be the narrow minded liberal pressure to boycott any company that remotely disagrees with them on even a single issue, like David Hogg has advocated for.
So, according to you, Fox is narrow-minded and liberal?
Well, I'll give you the narrow-minded part.
From what little I've seen of Pirro, she doesn't strike me as the most intelligent or the most original talking head on TV. I think it'll be easy to replace her with someone similar. Or maybe she and Fox will kiss and make up. Up to them, I don't care.
It's just interesting to see Fox's corporate 'principles' in action. Hint - it's about the Benjamins. I suspect their tea leaves (and her sponsors' tea leaves) are telling them that Pirro's audience is either stagnating or decreasing. If that's the case, you should be cheering them on for making airtime available to someone more compelling. Even conservatives should be glad to see dead wood go.
FOX news, along with all the other leftist networks are gearing up for the 2020 election. They have to silence any speech that exposes the leftist agenda. Rupert Murdoch's son is in control now.
These suspensions are all about controlling the narrative for the 2020 election in favor of the leftist Democrats.
Conservatives have to create their own media outlets, Trump will speak directly to Americans and bypass the leftist media. Other conservative politicians, reporters will do the same.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.