Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 05-23-2019, 10:46 AM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
10,965 posts, read 21,993,410 times
Reputation: 10685

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by LifeIsGood01 View Post
That's not the point,. The point is the HUD secretary should know what an REO is and then correct her is she's mistaken. She gave the briefest definition. Carson didn't ask her what happens if people make their account current. Ben Carson doesn't know a deed in lieu from Babaloo and that's the problem because he's the head of HUD/FHA
Actually what matters is they were both wrong, and they collectively are making decisions for the country without guidance from people with a deeper understanding of the topic, which was real estate in this instance. It happens across the board in other areas besides RE though. They should get a bunch of smart people in the industry together and let them brainstorm together. In this case those smart people would be lenders, Realtors, and appraisers.

 
Old 05-23-2019, 01:13 PM
 
6,706 posts, read 5,941,631 times
Reputation: 17075
Congratulations, a moronic politician managed to trip up a renowned brain surgeon. He still has a higher I.Q. than any ten Congresspeeps combined.

He may not be a "housing expert", but he has walked the walk. He grew up in miserable public housing in Detroit and knows the experience of poverty better than anyone who was questioning him. Mock him all you want. He's the one who deserves my admiration, not those lousy politicians.

Quote:
"It would be hilarious if it weren’t so tragic that people are losing their homes with FHA loans," wrote a Twitter user.
Yes but the foreclosures happened during the Obama era. Right now, record employment rates are fueling increases in home ownership.

The only negative is that mortgage deduction was cut for high income homeowners but that doesn't stop high income people from buying homes; it just deprives the local state government of millions of dollars in unearned tax income.
 
Old 05-23-2019, 01:24 PM
 
Location: Cary, NC
43,314 posts, read 77,154,614 times
Reputation: 45664
Quote:
Originally Posted by blisterpeanuts View Post
Congratulations, a moronic politician managed to trip up a renowned brain surgeon. He still has a higher I.Q. than any ten Congresspeeps combined.

He may not be a "housing expert", but he has walked the walk. He grew up in miserable public housing in Detroit and knows the experience of poverty better than anyone who was questioning him. Mock him all you want. He's the one who deserves my admiration, not those lousy politicians.



Yes but the foreclosures happened during the Obama era. Right now, record employment rates are fueling increases in home ownership.

The only negative is that mortgage deduction was cut for high income homeowners but that doesn't stop high income people from buying homes; it just deprives the local state government of millions of dollars in unearned tax income.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/...sure-rate-usa/
^^^^ That has a paywall. You get one peek, apparently.
Here are your tax dollars at work:
https://www.federalreserve.gov/relea...f/delallsa.htm


The "Obama era" comment is a bit off the mark in cogency. He inherited a huge recession bomb, and early in his administration foreclosures peaked. Later in his second term, the trend line was clear, that they were reducing as the economy was recovering.
 
Old 05-23-2019, 01:51 PM
 
12,016 posts, read 12,770,190 times
Reputation: 13420
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeJaquish View Post
https://www.statista.com/statistics/...sure-rate-usa/
^^^^ That has a paywall. You get one peek, apparently.
Here are your tax dollars at work:
https://www.federalreserve.gov/relea...f/delallsa.htm


The "Obama era" comment is a bit off the mark in cogency. He inherited a huge recession bomb, and early in his administration foreclosures peaked. Later in his second term, the trend line was clear, that they were reducing as the economy was recovering.
Yes, the housing crash happened during Bush Jr's last year in office, and Obama was left to clean up the mess and he did a great job and Trump is riding his coattails and taking credit. What Trump did was make the rich richer by giving them tax cuts at the expense of the budget deficit. Today he wants more government welfare in the form of $18 billion to help the farmers that he hurt with this tariffs.
 
Old 05-23-2019, 01:58 PM
 
6,706 posts, read 5,941,631 times
Reputation: 17075
Quote:
Originally Posted by LifeIsGood01 View Post
Yes, the housing crash happened during Bush Jr's last year in office, and Obama was left to clean up the mess and he did a great job and Trump is riding his coattails and taking credit. What Trump did was make the rich richer by giving them tax cuts at the expense of the budget deficit. Today he wants more government welfare in the form of $18 billion to help the farmers that he hurt with this tariffs.
The Bush Administration tried for years to cut back on reckless lending, but the Democrats refused. Look up Barney Frank and the crusade to put every poor family in their own home. A noble cause, maybe, but fiscally foolish.

Except for the mortgage repeal, the Trump tax cuts have greatly benefited the middle class. Everyone's paying less taxes. Business have less overhead because of the reduced corporate income tax. The economy's humming and employment is at record levels. Business confidence jumped through the roof once it was clear Trump would win. Doesn't really matter what socialists think. The capitalists understand that this is a Trump economy, not an Obama economy.

The tariffs are to restore fairness after decades of China ripping us off and putting millions of American factory workers out of work. And it's starting to work.

But we digress....
 
Old 05-23-2019, 02:07 PM
 
Location: Cary, NC
43,314 posts, read 77,154,614 times
Reputation: 45664
Quote:
Originally Posted by blisterpeanuts View Post
The Bush Administration tried for years to cut back on reckless lending, but the Democrats refused. Look up Barney Frank and the crusade to put every poor family in their own home. A noble cause, maybe, but fiscally foolish.

Except for the mortgage repeal, the Trump tax cuts have greatly benefited the middle class. Everyone's paying less taxes. Business have less overhead because of the reduced corporate income tax. The economy's humming and employment is at record levels. Business confidence jumped through the roof once it was clear Trump would win. Doesn't really matter what socialists think. The capitalists understand that this is a Trump economy, not an Obama economy.

The tariffs are to restore fairness after decades of China ripping us off and putting millions of American factory workers out of work. And it's starting to work.

But we digress....

The legitimate lending parameters were minimal components of the crash.
The bundling of weak loans with good paper and selling/buying of concealed bad paper and the realization that fraud was perpetuated in the bundles were what dang near brought us all down.


I don't care about the politics of the last 20 years as much as noting that there is credit and blame aplenty, for all to share.
 
Old 05-23-2019, 02:24 PM
 
14,400 posts, read 14,318,816 times
Reputation: 45732
Quote:
Originally Posted by EricBoyd View Post
Based on the video clip in the link, her brief explanation of an REO isn’t correct. It isn’t REO until after the property is foreclosed and actually becomes bank-owned property. She said, “That’s what happens when a property goes to foreclosure.” No, Congresswoman, that’s not what happens.

But, yeah, let’s make jokes about a brain surgeon not knowing an acronym.
That "neurosurgeon" is Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. Plus, he's held that cabinet post for over two years. A normal person would pick up on things like that in two years.

Carson is typical of many Trump appointees. They are arrogant. Many do not think the positions they have been given even ought to exist. HUD primarily exists because of problems of urban renewal in cities. I doubt Trump and his party care much about cities because its not where they got their votes and they won't get them there in 2020.

Carson ought to be in a job he is qualified for. I would suggest the Surgeon General position is an example of that. However, he clearly does lack the ability to serve competently as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.

But, hey instead of calling it what it is....let's deflect. Let's try to blame a Congresswoman testing his knowledge.
 
Old 05-23-2019, 03:24 PM
 
Location: Fort Benton, MT
910 posts, read 1,083,544 times
Reputation: 2730
Quote:
Originally Posted by LifeIsGood01 View Post
He's not qualified and has no interest in learning even the most basic of terms, Just like the rest of the current cabinet positions they are all wrong and the worst that can be chosen for their appointments. He should want to be familiar with basic terms, instead he makes himself look like a fool.





This is a flat out lie. You should be ashamed of yourself. You clearly haven't paid attention to all of the appointments. Chuck Rettig, the IRS Commissioner, is a Attorney with a lifetime of experience defending clients against the IRS. He has an impeccable resume. Steve Mnuchin, the Treasury Secretary, is a career investment banker. I know that you aren't thrilled with Dr. Carson, but to make a blanket statement is wrong.
 
Old 05-23-2019, 04:52 PM
 
Location: Berkeley Neighborhood, Denver, CO USA
17,712 posts, read 29,839,573 times
Reputation: 33311
REO


Oreo
 
Old 05-23-2019, 04:58 PM
 
Location: Annandale, VA
6,993 posts, read 2,713,357 times
Reputation: 7183
Quote:
Originally Posted by LifeIsGood01 View Post
That's not the point,. The point is the HUD secretary should know what an REO is and then correct her is she's mistaken. She gave the briefest definition. Carson didn't ask her what happens if people make their account current. Ben Carson doesn't know a deed in lieu from Babaloo and that's the problem because he's the head of HUD/FHA
So what? There are over a 1000 people in the Dept of HUD who do know what it is. He is a MANAGER. He is paid to set policy, not get in the weeds with real estate transactions.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:28 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top