Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-22-2019, 03:54 AM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,664,869 times
Reputation: 13053

Advertisements

“Save Chick-fil-A” bill passes in Tx House. GOP is learning to fight and Tx is leading the way in its own way.

The government should not take any adverse actions against those exercising there constitutional rights.
The rights of one is not superior to that of another.

Texas Lawmakers Pass 'Save Chick-Fil-A' Bill In The House | The ...
https://dailycaller.com/2019/05/21/t...e-chick-fil-a/

“It strengthens and reaffirms Texas’s First Amendment rights,” Republican state Rep. Matt Krause said to The Daily Caller News Foundation. “We had seen instances around the country where individuals were starting to be penalized … for what they believed or who they associated with.”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-22-2019, 04:00 AM
 
Location: Honolulu/DMV Area/NYC
30,641 posts, read 18,249,084 times
Reputation: 34520
Good. I thought it was a disgrace that government decided to discriminate against a private enterprise this way because they didn't like some of the religious/political views of some of the organization's leaders. I may disagree with some of the beliefs of the Cathy family, but its a damn disgrace for government to act in the way that some Texas (and other state) cities did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2019, 04:29 AM
 
1,199 posts, read 639,435 times
Reputation: 2031
I guess it’s slow season in the Texas legislature. All they need now is a companion bill declaring chicken delicious. Maybe a resolution making Doodles the Chicken the official state bird.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2019, 04:35 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,340 posts, read 14,281,167 times
Reputation: 27863
Don't mess with Texas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2019, 04:45 AM
 
8,302 posts, read 5,713,726 times
Reputation: 7557
While maybe not tehnically illegal (as cities are creatures of the state), it is quite frankly awfully authoritarian and mighty hypocritical coming from a party that loves to preach about small government. Furthermore, I have no doubt yhe city of San Antonio wil challenge it in court, wasting millions of Texas' taxpayer dollars to defend what's ultimately petty legislation.

From a philosophical standpoint, municipalities should be free to decline investment from whoever they want. And turnabout is always fair play. GOP politicians certainly wouldn't like it if Democratic politicians forced their suburban/rural municipalites to accept apartments or homeless shelter, when they cry about them "changing the character of their community" and "bringing in riff raff."

Last edited by citidata18; 05-22-2019 at 04:53 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2019, 04:45 AM
 
Location: *
13,240 posts, read 4,930,214 times
Reputation: 3461
PROJECT BLITZ IS A COORDINATED NATIONAL EFFORT TO CODIFY A FAR-RIGHT, EVANGELICAL CHRISTIAN AMERICA

Project Blitz is part of a larger national trend to redefine religious liberty as a sword used to harm others instead of a shield that protects people. Its organizers' strategy is to pass an increasingly ambitious set of state laws, starting with bills that require prominently displaying “In God We Trust” and establishing Bible classes in public schools and escalating to laws that would permit religion to be used to justify discrimination.

https://www.au.org/tags/project-blitz
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2019, 04:49 AM
 
Location: Lee County, NC
3,319 posts, read 2,342,240 times
Reputation: 4383
Quote:
Originally Posted by citidata18 View Post
From a common sense standpoint, municipalities should be free to decline investment from whoever they want. And turnabout is always fair play.
Would you say the same thing if a conservative city told a restaurant owned by a gay activist we don't want you here?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2019, 04:49 AM
 
7,420 posts, read 2,712,234 times
Reputation: 7783
Quote:
Originally Posted by prospectheightsresident View Post
Good. I thought it was a disgrace that government decided to discriminate against a private enterprise this way because they didn't like some of the religious/political views of some of the organization's leaders. I may disagree with some of the beliefs of the Cathy family, but its a damn disgrace for government to act in the way that some Texas (and other state) cities did.
Almost as disgraceful as Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, Kentucky and on and on as these states seek unprecedented power over all women of child-bearing age.... just because their GOP legislators do not agree with the law of the land and a women's right to reproductive autonomy and basic human and civil rights.

This is the real slippery slope, if you ask me!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2019, 04:51 AM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,664,869 times
Reputation: 13053
Quote:
Originally Posted by Partial Observer View Post
I guess it’s slow season in the Texas legislature. All they need now is a companion bill declaring chicken delicious. Maybe a resolution making Doodles the Chicken the official state bird.
A prairie chicken in Tx. is a rattlesnake.

Taste like chicken but be careful removing the feathers !!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2019, 04:56 AM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,664,869 times
Reputation: 13053
Quote:
Originally Posted by corpgypsy View Post
Almost as disgraceful as Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, Kentucky and on and on as these states seek unprecedented power over all women of child-bearing age.... just because their GOP legislators do not agree with the law of the land and a women's right to reproductive autonomy and basic human and civil rights.

This is the real slippery slope, if you ask me!
Well.....no doubt the left will get themselves a slip and fall lawyer to tie it up in court for awhile !!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top