Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-07-2019, 10:30 AM
 
45,582 posts, read 27,187,569 times
Reputation: 23892

Advertisements

They should keep the signs up so that it's a reminder that they are clueless on global warming and climate.


Glacier National Park Quietly Removes Its ‘Gone by 2020’ Signs

St. Mary, Montana. Officials at Glacier National Park (GNP) have begun quietly removing and altering signs and government literature which told visitors that the Park’s glaciers were all expected to disappear by either 2020 or 2030.

In recent years the National Park Service prominently featured brochures, signs and films which boldly proclaimed that all glaciers at GNP were melting away rapidly. But now officials at GNP seem to be scrambling to hide or replace their previous hysterical claims while avoiding any notice to the public that the claims were inaccurate. Teams from Lysander Spooner University visiting the Park each September have noted that GNP’s most famous glaciers such as the Grinnell Glacier and the Jackson Glacier appear to have been growing—not shrinking—since about 2010.



Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-07-2019, 10:32 AM
 
5,717 posts, read 3,146,486 times
Reputation: 7374
They'll just update it to 2040.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2019, 10:34 AM
 
45,582 posts, read 27,187,569 times
Reputation: 23892
Quote:
Originally Posted by neko_mimi View Post
They'll just update it to 2040.
No... they are not making that mistake again. Now it's just some undefined nebulous point in the future.


But at some point during this past winter (as the visitor center was closed to the public), workers replaced the diorama’s ‘gone by 2020’ engraving with a new sign indicating the glaciers will disappear in “future generations.”


They tried to sneak in the sign change and did it while the park was closed. Nice try...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2019, 10:39 AM
 
Location: Austin TX
11,027 posts, read 6,507,044 times
Reputation: 13259
I don’t know, man. My husband and I spent three full weeks up in Glacier just a few years ago. One day we took a long helicopter tour over the entire glacier region and honestly, there just isn’t much left. 2020 was a real stretch of a date, but I can definitely see depletion around 2030. I recommend anyone who has ever wanted to visit Glacier giddyup and do it pretty soon, because regardless of the cause, the glaciers are definitely shrinking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2019, 10:42 AM
 
19,721 posts, read 10,124,301 times
Reputation: 13090
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATX Wahine View Post
I don’t know, man. My husband and I spent three full weeks up in Glacier just a few years ago. One day we took a long helicopter tour over the entire glacier region and honestly, there just isn’t much left. 2020 was a real stretch of a date, but I can definitely see depletion around 2030. I recommend anyone who has ever wanted to visit Glacier giddyup and do it pretty soon, because regardless of the cause, the glaciers are definitely shrinking.
They should be, we are still coming out of the last ice age.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2019, 10:44 AM
 
Location: Brackenwood
9,981 posts, read 5,681,961 times
Reputation: 22138
Quote:
Originally Posted by Floorist View Post
They should be, we are still coming out of the last ice age.
15,000 years ago -- a blink of an eye in geological terms -- the ground I'm sitting on was covered by a sheet of ice roughly two miles thick. As it melted and retreated, it left behind the world's largest repository of fresh water that is the literal life blood of this entire region. Oh yeah, and the world became a much more hospitable place for living things. Mankind, once on the verge of extinction, now thrives and flourishes. Yay global warming!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2019, 10:46 AM
 
45,582 posts, read 27,187,569 times
Reputation: 23892
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATX Wahine View Post
I don’t know, man. My husband and I spent three full weeks up in Glacier just a few years ago. One day we took a long helicopter tour over the entire glacier region and honestly, there just isn’t much left. 2020 was a real stretch of a date, but I can definitely see depletion around 2030. I recommend anyone who has ever wanted to visit Glacier giddyup and do it pretty soon, because regardless of the cause, the glaciers are definitely shrinking.
Interesting - the person from the article goes there every year and says glaciers have been increasing since 2010.

Maybe it was worse off back in 2010?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2019, 10:47 AM
 
8,498 posts, read 4,561,677 times
Reputation: 9754
They will eventually be replaced by signs indicating where the glaciers once were.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2019, 10:48 AM
 
5,983 posts, read 2,236,544 times
Reputation: 4622
If we are still coming out of an ice age then expect our border issues to get worse. If it’s scorched earth past Mexico due to increased temps and no rain, those people will be coming to our door for help.

That would mean that this border crisis will continue and a simple wall won’t help if millions are coming. A concrete or steel wall won’t hold that many back without turning into a shooting gallery.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2019, 10:49 AM
 
Location: Austin TX
11,027 posts, read 6,507,044 times
Reputation: 13259
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
Interesting - the person from the article goes there every year and says glaciers have been increasing since 2010.

Maybe it was worse off back in 2010?
I can’t buy into that; you can see photographic evidence of recession in centers all around the park. The big debate to me is what is fractionally just natural weather patterns, and what if any is “man made”.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:11 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top