Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-20-2019, 08:04 AM
 
Location: NW Nevada
18,158 posts, read 15,619,989 times
Reputation: 17149

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
Iran claims it was their airspace.

They also claim the entire strait of Hormuz as their territorial waters. Not a whole lot of credibility there. I do believe that conflict is a foregone conclusion in this penile swinging contest. We have been heading down the trail to a shootout with Iran since 1978.


It can be argued that Iran is the "innocent" victim here till Gabriel toots on his trumpet but it won't change anything. Things were a lot more tense than this back in 88. I remember that pretty well. Iranian fast boats vs Marine Corps Cobra attack helicopters.


I recall one instance where a newsie chopper got to close to a patrol area and were sent packing by the Marines with a stern warning. The newsies got some good footage of the Cobras. A few fast boats got smoked, the Iranians blustered and howled "death to America". They drew a "line of death" like Khaddafi did in the Med. The Navy come along and snorted it.


The situation now is very similar to what it was then. Trump has been far kinder than Reagan was though. He has shown restraint that Reagan said the hell with. The way the Dems are howling about warmongering and how Trump is provoking Iran you would think that 88 never happened. Under the ROE that Reagan implemented the SAM site that fired the missile that took this drone out would be a smoking hole in the ground. Maybe a few other sites as well.


I also remember what happened with Libya and their entire coastal defense system of SAM sites. The Navy took every single one out and the Air Force types flew in unopposed and bombed Tripoli. Khaddaffi never knew what hit him. Could be that Iran just needs a reminder of just who they're picking a fight with. Contrary to what the leftists are screaming Trump doesn't want an actual war with Iran. But if we are going to make any headway with them in any negotiations we need to be dealing from a position of strength.


Iran needs to know that they are under our knife. Islamowackos don't understand any thing else. If we did things the way the Islamists understand in Iraq and Afghanistan Al Queda and the Taliban would have been a lot more reluctant to fight. They would have seen us as "civilized" by their standards if we had been lopping off heads and putting them on pikes.


It doesn't matter a fart in a high wind what the US may have done in the past to **** off the Iranians. Bombing, civilian casualties, drone strikes whatever across the ME, our alliance with Israel and just the fact that the US is not an Islamic country. All by themselves would be enough for Iran to hate us. No matter the cause it is what it is and we need to deal with it.


The drone was in their airspace by Irans standards as were those tankers that got hit. They don't operate by international Maritime and aviation rules. Like it or not we can ill afford to back down and be all touchy feely. It doesn't even have to wind up in an all out war with invasion forces and ground troops. Matter of fact if we play things right that won't even be a possibility. Just like what happened 30 years ago Iran just needs a reminder of what the US Navy can do by itself.


All the crying, hand wringing and excuses for Iran's attitude aside. Again it doesn't matter how we got here. Fact is we are here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-20-2019, 08:05 AM
 
45,676 posts, read 24,000,087 times
Reputation: 15559
So the Iranians, who apparently do not have the resources to fight a war with the USA and win, are trying to provoke a war with the USA.

Hard to get my head around that logic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2019, 08:11 AM
 
13,510 posts, read 17,030,950 times
Reputation: 9691
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
So the Iranians, who apparently do not have the resources to fight a war with the USA and win, are trying to provoke a war with the USA.

Hard to get my head around that logic.
Bolton using the old playbook.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2019, 08:13 AM
 
7,447 posts, read 2,831,505 times
Reputation: 4922
Still don't buy it. This administration has a severe lack of credibility problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2019, 08:13 AM
 
45,203 posts, read 26,421,987 times
Reputation: 24965
Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener2307 View Post
The message is clear. US and international sanctions are hurting Iran very badly.
We should keep doing what we are doing....
Do you feel threatened by the Iranian people, i.e. its women and children? They are the ones who suffer under sanctions
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2019, 08:14 AM
 
15,047 posts, read 8,868,945 times
Reputation: 9509
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
So the Iranians, who apparently do not have the resources to fight a war with the USA and win, are trying to provoke a war with the USA.

Hard to get my head around that logic.
The warmongers do not want you to think about this in any logical way. They want you to wave your flag, mindlessly cheer your warmonger president and send your children to die. You know, the usual "patriotic" drill we get from warmongers like Bolton and Cheney and Rumsfeld.

And apparently there are a whole lot of people who will obediently oblige. Again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2019, 08:15 AM
 
9,639 posts, read 6,014,802 times
Reputation: 8567
Quote:
Originally Posted by NVplumber View Post
They also claim the entire strait of Hormuz as their territorial waters. Not a whole lot of credibility there. I do believe that conflict is a foregone conclusion in this penile swinging contest. We have been heading down the trail to a shootout with Iran since 1978.


It can be argued that Iran is the "innocent" victim here till Gabriel toots on his trumpet but it won't change anything. Things were a lot more tense than this back in 88. I remember that pretty well. Iranian fast boats vs Marine Corps Cobra attack helicopters.


I recall one instance where a newsie chopper got to close to a patrol area and were sent packing by the Marines with a stern warning. The newsies got some good footage of the Cobras. A few fast boats got smoked, the Iranians blustered and howled "death to America". They drew a "line of death" like Khaddafi did in the Med. The Navy come along and snorted it.


The situation now is very similar to what it was then. Trump has been far kinder than Reagan was though. He has shown restraint that Reagan said the hell with. The way the Dems are howling about warmongering and how Trump is provoking Iran you would think that 88 never happened. Under the ROE that Reagan implemented the SAM site that fired the missile that took this drone out would be a smoking hole in the ground. Maybe a few other sites as well.


I also remember what happened with Libya and their entire coastal defense system of SAM sites. The Navy took every single one out and the Air Force types flew in unopposed and bombed Tripoli. Khaddaffi never knew what hit him. Could be that Iran just needs a reminder of just who they're picking a fight with. Contrary to what the leftists are screaming Trump doesn't want an actual war with Iran. But if we are going to make any headway with them in any negotiations we need to be dealing from a position of strength.


Iran needs to know that they are under our knife. Islamowackos don't understand any thing else. If we did things the way the Islamists understand in Iraq and Afghanistan Al Queda and the Taliban would have been a lot more reluctant to fight. They would have seen us as "civilized" by their standards if we had been lopping off heads and putting them on pikes.


It doesn't matter a fart in a high wind what the US may have done in the past to **** off the Iranians. Bombing, civilian casualties, drone strikes whatever across the ME, our alliance with Israel and just the fact that the US is not an Islamic country. All by themselves would be enough for Iran to hate us. No matter the cause it is what it is and we need to deal with it.


The drone was in their airspace by Irans standards as were those tankers that got hit. They don't operate by international Maritime and aviation rules. Like it or not we can ill afford to back down and be all touchy feely. It doesn't even have to wind up in an all out war with invasion forces and ground troops. Matter of fact if we play things right that won't even be a possibility. Just like what happened 30 years ago Iran just needs a reminder of what the US Navy can do by itself.


All the crying, hand wringing and excuses for Iran's attitude aside. Again it doesn't matter how we got here. Fact is we are here.
If we were Iran and anyone was flying drones in the straights of Hormuz we’d shoot it down. International is 200 miles from the coast. Nothing in the straights of Hormuz is 200 miles from Iran.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2019, 08:16 AM
 
79,914 posts, read 44,178,048 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by saltine View Post
Should we ahoot these spies? Diannes spy?
https://politicalwire.com/2019/06/17...washington-dc/

10,000 Spies In Washington, DC
I never advocated shooting anyone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2019, 08:17 AM
 
5,462 posts, read 3,033,453 times
Reputation: 3271
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJJersey View Post
Iran shot down a 180 million dollars drone in international airspace:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-state-TV.html

They need to reimburse us.
This article is based on a claim made by "Iran s revolutionary guard" that they attacked an US drone . And of course that claim has no sources.

If they really did it, wouldnt have a war started by now??

Reuters or BBC used to publish images of Kim standing next to rockets lsat year when the tensions were high
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2019, 08:18 AM
 
7,420 posts, read 2,707,627 times
Reputation: 7783
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
Not if they are spying on Trump !!! The CIA and FBI will be in for the assist !!!

No evidence they used drones to do it but its still an ongoing investigation !!!

Don't let that $180 bother you to much.

Tech. cost money here !!! We aren't like China stealing it and getting it for free !!! Yet !!!
Deducing your allegiance is as mystifying as your posts!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top