Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Replace "all" and "everyone" with "on average"... and stop smacking yourself in the head, it lowers IQ.
This. I also find western Europeans on average more aesthetic, compatible, pleasant, less aggressive and more honest than third worlders, on average of course lol. That said that doesn't mean I want a million of them either immigrating a year like we get from the 3rd world.
You know its one thing to disagree with his policy. That is our right as American's. What she said is despicable. He is not a white supremacist. She knows it. She is nothing but a shameless pandering lying fake Indian!!
Then surely you agree with Trump when he said that white supremacists are among good people.
Then if that's the case how are leftist labeling Trump and possibly 10s of millions of white Americans such? the bold part is a problem because white democrats want to have control over as many people of other races they can ram through open borders.
The truth is most people the left labels white supremacist are just white people who want foreigners out of their hair and to buzz off and rather not have to control them.
Then surely you agree with Trump when he said that white supremacists are among good people.
If by white supremacists you mean those who don't want all this mass, global immigration to continue or just want diversity out of their and their people's hair, I'd say they are some of the most good, moral and righteous of people.
I wouldn't wish our immigration policies on my worst enemy. There's nothing good and moral about it, it's based entirely on greed, envy and a quest for more power enforced through coercion and keeping the populace muted and ignorant.
True the average American isn't controlling them, just supporting or paying for them with tax dollars, or sacrificing their standard of living and quality of life in numerous ways for them being here.
And what on earth would be wrong with that? Why is over 90% of our immigrants from 3rd world, non-Western countries? That is a big problem, with compatibility, affinity, aesthetic, cultural and intelligence differences.
There's something wrong with America continuing as a demographically white country it historically has been? That's a pretty racist assertion.
History is a series of points in time. There is no logical reason to assert that, from a racial point of view, one point in time is "better" than another. We are in a position of unprecedented numbers of human beings on this planet at the same time that resources are being diminished by climate change. These stressors lead to wars, corruption, economic catastrophes, depressions, etc. People go where they perceive the greatest chance of good for them and their children. Certainly the assertion that the country should "remain" white, or a higher percentage of white is at its base a racists belief because it grants rights of entry to one race, and denies entry to anyone it sees as non-white. But this desire flies in the face of demographic reality, and is doomed to failure one way or another. As humans, we all have failed to control a massive population expansion, and we will all suffer for this. Right now, portions of the American public are trying to claw back what used to be, but that is a dying and futile hope. The demographics of human kind are always changing, and the effect is exaggerated by the shear number of people. This country cannot be what it was 100 years ago. The white Europeans are no longer in need of a place to seek sanctuary. They aren't coming here in large numbers. This country's approach to managing immigration cannot be shaped by clinging to a vain and unrealistic wish for the past. It has to be rooted global realities NOW.
History is a series of points in time. There is no logical reason to assert that, from a racial point of view, one point in time is "better" than another. We are in a position of unprecedented numbers of human beings on this planet at the same time that resources are being diminished by climate change. These stressors lead to wars, corruption, economic catastrophes, depressions, etc. People go where they perceive the greatest chance of good for them and their children. Certainly the assertion that the country should "remain" white, or a higher percentage of white is at its base a racists belief because it grants rights of entry to one race, and denies entry to anyone it sees as non-white. But this desire flies in the face of demographic reality, and is doomed to failure one way or another. As humans, we all have failed to control a massive population expansion, and we will all suffer for this. Right now, portions of the American public are trying to claw back what used to be, but that is a dying and futile hope. The demographics of human kind are always changing, and the effect is exaggerated by the shear number of people. This country cannot be what it was 100 years ago. The white Europeans are no longer in need of a place to seek sanctuary. They aren't coming here in large numbers. This country's approach to managing immigration cannot be shaped by clinging to a vain and unrealistic wish for the past. It has to be rooted global realities NOW.
That's a lot of words and claims, but none of it do I agree with let alone convinces me we shouldn't end immigration. I've seen America past and present, and I don't want anymore of this post 1965 immigration. You can label a person with that notion anything you want, but I see it as the only right and moral notion to have.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.