Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-01-2019, 12:16 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
1,070 posts, read 393,725 times
Reputation: 528

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
That's quite a mental leap. I said no such thing. Whether Hunter or Joe Biden could be criminally prosecuted by a Ukrainian prosecutor is a question independent from whether Trump can use public office to induce a foreign leader to commence such a prosecution - particularly where, as here, the absence of any indicia of wrongdoing makes such a prosecution problematic.

The Democrats can investigate Trump for political gain. Trump can investigate Democrats for political gain. Neither of them can use public office to induce a foreign country to start a criminal investigation of the other. This should all be fairly self-evident.
Amen Limey, amen

Limey nailed it!!

 
Old 10-01-2019, 12:20 PM
 
8,957 posts, read 2,562,333 times
Reputation: 4725
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
That's quite a mental leap. I said no such thing. Whether Hunter or Joe Biden could be criminally prosecuted by a Ukrainian prosecutor is a question independent from whether Trump can use public office to induce a foreign leader to commence such a prosecution - particularly where, as here, the absence of any indicia of wrongdoing makes such a prosecution problematic.

The Democrats can investigate Trump for political gain. Trump can investigate Democrats for political gain. Neither of them can use public office to induce a foreign country to start a criminal investigation of the other. This should all be fairly self-evident.
There's a clear and obvious conflict of interest, and a quid pro quo interaction involving Biden... so how do you say with a straight face that there's no indication of wrongdoing? Also, no one said anything about prosecution, just "looking into" the situation.... do no one "induced a foreign country to start a criminal investigation". It's possible to look into a situation without stating a formal investigation.

Again, you've got nothing on Trump because he specifically didn't do what Biden did.

Last edited by bobbythegreat; 10-01-2019 at 12:23 PM.. Reason: Typo
 
Old 10-01-2019, 12:20 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,663,022 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by tb4000 View Post
Pelosi needs to **** or get off the pot.
 
Old 10-01-2019, 12:23 PM
 
7,447 posts, read 2,837,072 times
Reputation: 4922
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbythegreat View Post
There's a clear and obvious conflict of interest, and a quid pro quo interaction involving Biden... do how do you say with a straight face that there's no indication of wrongdoing? Also, no one said anything about prosecution, just "looking into" the situation.... do no one "induced a foreign country to start a criminal investigation". It's possible to look into a situation without stating a formal investigation.
You have a temporal problem with this little bit of fake news, the investigation of Burisma happened in 2012. Hunter Biden did not start working for Burisma until 2014.
 
Old 10-01-2019, 12:25 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,851 posts, read 26,307,990 times
Reputation: 34062
A new CNBC poll has Trump's approval rating at 37% an all time low for that poll. That same poll found 47% opposing impeachment hearings and 44% approving.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/01/trum...vey-finds.html
 
Old 10-01-2019, 12:25 PM
 
25,461 posts, read 9,821,441 times
Reputation: 15355
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbythegreat View Post
There's a clear and obvious conflict of interest, and a quid pro quo interaction involving Biden... so how do you say with a straight face that there's no indication of wrongdoing? Also, no one said anything about prosecution, just "looking into" the situation.... do no one "induced a foreign country to start a criminal investigation". It's possible to look into a situation without stating a formal investigation.

Again, you've got nothing on Trump because he specifically didn't do what Biden did.
Evidently many Dems and Republicans would disagree with you. Thus, the articles of impeachment. Read what Lindsey Graham said about impeachment in 1999, although he says the opposite today. It's to cleanse the office. And if there ever were an office that needed the stench cleaned out of it, it is the WH under Trump.
 
Old 10-01-2019, 12:27 PM
 
25,461 posts, read 9,821,441 times
Reputation: 15355
Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener2307 View Post
Democrats are not used to someone who will fight back.
Nice to see them struggle.


Likely voters support Trump by about 49% these days. It doesn't matter what "the people" think, since most of them won't vote.
Yeah, it's a real virtue to fight back when a separate branch of government is doing their constitutional duty because a president is abusing his power and oath of office. How did we get to this place?
 
Old 10-01-2019, 12:27 PM
 
9,254 posts, read 3,591,520 times
Reputation: 4852
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbythegreat View Post
There's a clear and obvious conflict of interest, and a quid pro quo interaction involving Biden... do how do you say with a straight face that there's no indication of wrongdoing? Also, no one said anything about prosecution, just "looking into" the situation.... do no one "induced a foreign country to start a criminal investigation". It's possible to look into a situation without stating a formal investigation.

Again, you've got nothing on Trump because he specifically didn't do what Biden did.
Again, the Democrats can investigate Trump for political gain. Trump can investigate Democrats for political gain. Neither of them can use public office to induce a foreign country to "look into the other" or start an investigation of the other, formal or otherwise.

Biden did not have a conflict because Shokin was not investigating his son or his son's company. Biden was acting on behalf of and at the behest of the US Government on a formal diplomatic mission with directions to advance official US policy including, in relevant part, the removal of Shokin due to his well-documented corruption. Ironically, Shokin's removal actually made it more likely that Hunter Biden's son's company would be investigated. This has been discussed ad naseum and, if you don't understand it by now, its because you are either unwilling or unable to do so.
 
Old 10-01-2019, 12:28 PM
 
25,461 posts, read 9,821,441 times
Reputation: 15355
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Which country and whose constitution?
If you have to ask, you may not like the answer, lol.
 
Old 10-01-2019, 12:28 PM
 
8,957 posts, read 2,562,333 times
Reputation: 4725
Quote:
Originally Posted by zzzSnorlax View Post
You have a temporal problem with this little bit of fake news, the investigation of Burisma happened in 2012. Hunter Biden did not start working for Burisma until 2014.
Yeah... and the investigation didn't go away until they hired Biden's son, someone with no qualifications other than having his father's ear, and then Biden threatening to withhold billions in aid unless the prosecutor going after the company was fired. It seems the 50k a month they were paying Biden's son paid off.

If this was a situation involving Don Jr and Trump there's no way you'd have the same opinion.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top