Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-07-2022, 09:56 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,896,383 times
Reputation: 20675

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Livinginwaterland View Post
How about he worries about shoring up social security instead. Oh, that’s okay, we can just print more money to cover that too. This is the democrat fiscal policy in the 21st century.
Shoring up Social Security?

Only way to achieve this is to cut benefits and/ or increase premiums ( payroll taxes). Obviously neither is popular and therefore this can ( of worms) continues to be kicked into the future.

The most obvious solution would be to raise or eliminate the cap on Social Security taxable wages.

Some may recall, the Bush 2 Admin sought to privatize a portion of Social Security. It failed to gain traction with Republicans, let alone across the aisle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-07-2022, 10:05 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,896,383 times
Reputation: 20675
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMSRetired View Post
How is a non interest LOAN from HHS the same as a bailout to state pensions ????
Loans are paid back, bailouts are not.

And Americans all over should not be taxed to pay for NY or CA pensions.
Up state taxes and let the residents cover their own.
And ^ is why states cannot bankrupt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2022, 10:07 AM
 
Location: Sunny So. Cal.
4,476 posts, read 1,748,602 times
Reputation: 3337
Quote:
Originally Posted by beach43ofus View Post
I know a retired NJ Librarian who get an enormous pension, and yes, she is a multi-millionaire.

I know 2 couples that were all teachers from up East, & their combined pensions are $100k+ per couple.

I know a retired (at 52 yrs old!) NJ police chief whose pension is almost $100k, & he just sold his Florida home for $1.3M.

My Grandfather was a retire Brooklyn fire fighter, and he made a LOT more in pension payments, than he ever made working, due to cost of living escalaters. He retired at 50, lived to 92, 42 years of pension payments after 30 years of working.

Anecdotal, but there are millions out there like these people I know. Gov't pensions are unsustainable, & all you have to do is look to the private sector for proof.
When I retire, my pension will be around $100,000 a year, plus whatever SS will give me for all the years that I worked for a SS employer.

.... and just in case anyone is confused, we actually PAY INTO the pension fund as employees (a higher percentage than SS recipients pay into SS), as do our employers. It's not exactly "free" money, it costs me quite a bit each month.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2022, 10:08 AM
 
Location: Sunny So. Cal.
4,476 posts, read 1,748,602 times
Reputation: 3337
Quote:
Originally Posted by beach43ofus View Post
https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics...eans-will-work

This article focuses on Biden's proposal to use $1.9T in taxpayer $'s to prop up unsustainable pension plans in the private sector.

When the details emerge, I predict it will mostly bail out gov't pension plans...like Chicago, Illinois, Connecticut, New Jersey, for example.

Gov't pensions have been over-promised for decades, & are a massive Ponzi scheme.

Pensions in the private sector have become nearly extinct, so there's not many left to bail out, which is why I say the $'s will go to gov't pensions.

Either way, Biden want to force YOU to pay for other people's retirements...the people he chooses.

Nevermind the fact that ~60% of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck & have 0$ saved for retirement.

If I'm right, & most of the ~$2T goes to gov't pensions, imagine what it will do to this 2018 chart:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Govern...ending_GDP.png

Pray that Manchin & Sinema will stand firm against this too.
What if you're wrong?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2022, 10:10 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
4,552 posts, read 4,085,646 times
Reputation: 3132
Here’s the fascist scam - pension plans invest. They invest in all those mega zombie companies that you call capitalist. Those investments pay for the salaries of those employed at those companies. When those companies fail as they should, Biden and RINO gov bail the pension funds out with tax money, that go straight to the “capitalist” corps’ employees salaries again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2022, 10:12 AM
 
Location: Sunny So. Cal.
4,476 posts, read 1,748,602 times
Reputation: 3337
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeNigh View Post
Here’s the fascist scam - pension plans invest. They invest in all those mega zombie companies that you call capitalist. Those investments pay for the salaries of those employed at those companies. When those companies fail as they should, Biden and RINO gov bail the pension funds out with tax money, that go straight to the “capitalist” corps’ employees salaries again.
Pretty much...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2022, 10:14 AM
 
8,406 posts, read 4,407,932 times
Reputation: 11930
Think thats called social security ... except its my money helping to pay for my retirement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2022, 10:18 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,896,383 times
Reputation: 20675
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Yep- the irresponsible leftist states do not have the money for their pensions.

So rather than asking them to not have such exorbitant pensions, Biden just bails them out.

The next president will reverse all Biden's insanity and/or the republican congress will pass legislation to reverse it
The OP’s introduced topic here is a bail out of the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corp ( PBGC), which is limited to single and multi- employer PRIVATE SECTOR pension plans.

The inability of PBGC to guarantee benefits has been projected for years as pension funding formulas have been diluted and employer premiums not kept pace with exposures.

ERISA and PBGC evolved following the failure of several major plans in the 60’s.

Both Nixon and Ford Admins supported legislation to regulate defined benefit plans and insure benefits in the event a private sector employer blows up.

Last edited by middle-aged mom; 07-07-2022 at 10:33 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2022, 10:27 AM
 
Location: North Pacific
15,754 posts, read 7,632,261 times
Reputation: 2576
Quote:
Originally Posted by ditchoc View Post
Think thats called social security ... except its my money helping to pay for my retirement.
That comes from the present generation of children's taxes in SS that are employed.

In 65 the SS system gave to the gov, a surplus, they were so happy with that that they spent it all plus. It's been in the hole ever since and is subject to go bust in 2030. That is when the bulk of the (largest participant in workforce) Boomers are set to finalize retirement.

This is what happens when the people rely on the government (with a deficit in leadership) to manage --- anything.



I.O.U.S.A.: Byte-Sized - The 30 Minute Version
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2022, 10:41 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,896,383 times
Reputation: 20675
Quote:
Originally Posted by Variable View Post
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) existed since 1974 - long before Biden was president. It's good for the small guy - regular workers.

Before PBGC, my father lost his pension because his employer went bankrupt. Poof, gone. PBGC was formed to prevent workers from getting their pensions wiped out after working for decades expecting the pension they were promised.

There are a lot of hard working blue collar construction workers, railroad workers, coal miners, manufacturing workers, teachers, police, firefighters and laborers that would lose their pension if not for PBGC.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pensio...ty_Corporation

PBGC is not funded by general tax revenues. Its funds come from four sources:
  • Insurance premiums paid by sponsors of defined benefit pension plans;
  • Assets held by the pension plans it takes over;
  • Recoveries of unfunded pension liabilities from plan sponsors' bankruptcy estates; and
  • Investment income.
ERISA, thus the PBGC, expressly exempts employee benefit plans established or operated by state, municipal or other government entities and churches. Thus, teachers, police and firefighter pensions are not a part of PBGC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top