Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-14-2022, 11:24 AM
 
Location: Arizona
13,277 posts, read 7,326,738 times
Reputation: 10112

Advertisements

Republicans and Democrats have agreed to overhaul the act which will clarify the Vice Presidents role in the electoral certification.


https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/14/polit...ors/index.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-14-2022, 11:28 AM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,080 posts, read 51,252,674 times
Reputation: 28328
Republicans are worried that Kamala might decide who the next president should be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2022, 11:35 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,392,274 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
Republicans are worried that Kamala might decide who the next president should be.
Only if they're Constitutionally illiterate. "Shall count" is pretty simple to grasp.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2022, 11:36 AM
 
Location: Honolulu/DMV Area/NYC
30,642 posts, read 18,249,084 times
Reputation: 34520
So if the act seeks to "clarify" the matter, does that mean that the matter isn't quite clear as some have claimed (on both sides) to begin with?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2022, 11:40 AM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,434 posts, read 60,623,477 times
Reputation: 61048
Will the clarification include having Madonna fellate individuals to change their vote?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2022, 11:41 AM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,697 posts, read 34,579,481 times
Reputation: 29291
Quote:
Originally Posted by prospectheightsresident View Post
So if the act seeks to "clarify" the matter, does that mean that the matter isn't quite clear as some have claimed (on both sides) to begin with?
it would seem so. otherwise, why the need for clarification?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2022, 11:45 AM
 
Location: The Piedmont of North Carolina
6,035 posts, read 2,854,310 times
Reputation: 7678
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
Only if they're Constitutionally illiterate. "Shall count" is pretty simple to grasp.
This is why I do not understand why some are caught up in the "betrayal" from Vice President Pence. All the Vice President does is count the votes of the electors. Anything else is supposed to be dealt with in State Houses. There was nothing he could have done, even if there was solid evidence of a stolen election.

(I am not quite sure I believe the election was stolen, but it certainly was not fair.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2022, 11:50 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,392,274 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by FordBronco1967 View Post
This is why I do not understand why some are caught up in the "betrayal" from Vice President Pence. All the Vice President does is count the votes of the electors. Anything else is supposed to be dealt with in State Houses. There was nothing he could have done, even if there was solid evidence of a stolen election...
Exactly right. We don't often agree, but we certainly do here. Reps to you!


People want to play dumb and pretend like they don't understand clear, explicit instruction from the Constitution - and it's conservatives who claim to love and cherish it! They want to pretend like if the Constitution doesn't specifically forbid it, Pence could have done it and there is absolutely nothing to support that position. Nothing.

The Constitution clearly details how to object to electoral votes and it has zero to do with the VP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2022, 11:50 AM
 
Location: Brackenwood
9,985 posts, read 5,689,285 times
Reputation: 22138
What exactly needs clarifying?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2022, 11:51 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,392,274 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga View Post
it would seem so. otherwise, why the need for clarification?
Because some partisans decided to be intentionally ignorant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top