Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-12-2008, 05:13 PM
 
571 posts, read 853,147 times
Reputation: 58

Advertisements

I use to live in england and today most british people are admitting national healthcare was a mistake. Because in the long run it brings down the quality of the healthcare. In canada they have crappy healthcare. The fact is national healthcare saves lives in the short run however in the long run it makes quality of medical advances crappy. Mainly because of all the fellowships will be drop down dramatically.

I'm a Democrat by the way
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-12-2008, 05:19 PM
 
Location: Wheaton, Illinois
10,261 posts, read 21,751,326 times
Reputation: 10454
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatday View Post
I, for one, don't "defend" any insurance company. Personally, I'm very happy with the coverage I have. I feel it is a fair price. My "needs" have not been ignored one bit.

I do not support the concept of a UHI / UHC in the United States

That's fine, it's reasonable for you to defend what works in your interest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2008, 06:12 PM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,535 posts, read 37,136,097 times
Reputation: 14000
Quote:
Originally Posted by .....think View Post
I use to live in england and today most british people are admitting national healthcare was a mistake. Because in the long run it brings down the quality of the healthcare. In canada they have crappy healthcare. The fact is national healthcare saves lives in the short run however in the long run it makes quality of medical advances crappy. Mainly because of all the fellowships will be drop down dramatically.

I'm a Democrat by the way
You shouldn't make statements about things you are ignorant about...Canada's health care is far from crappy, and there are more important medical advances being made in Canada than you think.

Medical Advances: That May Save Your Life (http://www.readersdigest.ca/mag/2001/12/medical.html - broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2008, 04:17 PM
 
Location: Bradenton, Florida
27,232 posts, read 46,654,488 times
Reputation: 11084
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
They can better benefits by going out and getting a job that offers it. Even if that includes running for Congress.
If you HAVE a job, then you should be "covered". It shouldn't even come up. When ASKED if I want to sign up for benefits, my answer is "Hell no!"...but when I served in the military, there was no question of whether I'd be "covered" or not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2008, 04:24 PM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,852,928 times
Reputation: 9283
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
You shouldn't make statements about things you are ignorant about...Canada's health care is far from crappy, and there are more important medical advances being made in Canada than you think.

Medical Advances: That May Save Your Life (http://www.readersdigest.ca/mag/2001/12/medical.html - broken link)
You are the one who shouldn't be talking about things you are ignorant about... that stuff they used in Canada... started in the USA with your healthcare used to pay for it... The Canadians used it from our developments... if we didn't want it... it would of never been made... and even then, do you think it would be readily available if the US didn't subsidize it for the world to use? How do we subsidize it? By making Americans pay more for it... can't wait for universal health care and the world has to pay more for it and whine... then we will see a decline in quality of medical care... you get what you pay for... its nice to be responsible when it comes to other people's money... or should I say irresponsible...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2008, 04:42 PM
 
1,570 posts, read 2,069,369 times
Reputation: 461
yes if you need the attention.

no if you are perfectly healthy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2008, 05:25 PM
 
358 posts, read 518,411 times
Reputation: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by LLLL98 View Post
I haven't seen this particular question and I am curious on people's opinions.

Do you feel that availability to healthcare is your "right" as an American?

If not, should it be?

Does morality factor into this at all? Is it relevant to the question of whether it is or is not a "right"?

NO, health care is not a right. the Constitution says "general welfare", not nanny from cradle to grave.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2008, 06:24 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,848,488 times
Reputation: 18304
No;otherwise congress wouldn't have to do anything for you to get it. Even then you will have to signup and pay the premium if it ever passes. If it were a right all you would have to do is make a appointment and then pay nothing ;isn't going to work anywhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2008, 06:28 PM
 
994 posts, read 1,544,575 times
Reputation: 148
It is in many other countries, but not here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2008, 06:32 PM
 
1,818 posts, read 3,093,587 times
Reputation: 229
I feel we are entitled to health care, we pay into it every month. The premiums go up and the quality may go down, but most of us have health care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top