|

02-24-2009, 04:53 PM
|
|
Not a member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
40 posts, read 19,700 times
Reputation: 19
|
|
Is the economic crash and resulting unemployment a bigger threat than Islamic Terrorism?
I understand that Homeland Security and the CIA are more concerned about the social and economic effects of the terrible economy than Islamic Terrorism. They think that as unemployment all over the world continues to growth that this will create civil unrest with a huge increase in crime and disorder. They say it has a higher risk to world stability than Islamic Terrorism. Do you agree?
|
|

02-24-2009, 05:02 PM
|
|
Senior Member
Status:
"Proof Read, Who's Got Time To Proof Read?"
(set 7 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
7,540 posts, read 1,748,102 times
Reputation: 1947
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spring greenery
I understand that Homeland Security and the CIA are more concerned about the social and economic effects of the terrible economy than Islamic Terrorism. They think that as unemployment all over the world continues to growth that this will create civil unrest with a huge increase in crime and disorder. They say it has a higher risk to world stability than Islamic Terrorism. Do you agree?
|
Crime and disorder are the least of your problems. Periods of economic distress have more often than not been a harbinger of radical social transformation, whether it was the finacial crisis of 1776 that eventually led to the overthrow of the French monarchy or the Great Depression which resulted in the rise of marxism and fascism, and a second world war. Of course all of this is lost on the, let the markets correct themselves school of governance.
But I digress.
To answer the question, yes, economic collapse is a far graver risks to nations than Islamic terrorist. How does one compare the collapse of social orders to a few bombings and acts of terrorism regardless of how horrific the localized cost.
|
|

02-24-2009, 05:05 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Here
311 posts, read 103,488 times
Reputation: 64
|
|
|
after I've experienced the fright of a terrorist attack, I think there is really nothing worse. economy will fix itself.
|
|

02-24-2009, 05:06 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
2,156 posts, read 1,474,727 times
Reputation: 503
|
|
|
Yes, Yes and Hell Yes!
|
|

02-24-2009, 05:10 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cushing OK
1,485 posts, read 539,356 times
Reputation: 831
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto
Crime and disorder are the least of your problems. Periods of economic distress have more often than not been a harbinger of radical social transformation, whether it was the finacial crisis of 1776 that eventually led to the overthrow of the French monarchy or the Great Depression which resulted in the rise of marxism and fascism, and a second world war. Of course all of this is lost on the, let the markets correct themselves school of governance.
But I digress.
To answer the question, yes, economic collapse is a far graver risks to nations than Islamic terrorist. How does one compare the collapse of social orders to a few bombings and acts of terrorism regardless of how horrific the localized cost.
|
Very important point. When massive numbers of people suffer not only do they become desperate enought to do what needs to be done regardless of if they would have before, but the mob psychology kicks in. Re Hitler. And even more the French Revolution. The blood stained streets and people were acting on the psychology of the mob. We have plenty of people who would have no difficulty falling into that.
And remember that terrorism and bombings do not have to be external. When you can blame a guy half way across the world its one thing, but when its someone out there who could be readying the next bomb and nobody will tell its quite different. No reason to think that this would not be a part.
|
|

02-24-2009, 05:13 PM
|
|
Senior Member
Status:
"Proof Read, Who's Got Time To Proof Read?"
(set 7 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
7,540 posts, read 1,748,102 times
Reputation: 1947
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marty McFly Jr
after I've experienced the fright of a terrorist attack, I think there is really nothing worse. economy will fix itself.
|
Well until you've lived through an economic collapse on the scale of the Panic of 1873, or the Great Depression, you argument doesn't hold much weight. To make an analogy; You have experienced the fright of a tornado so you don't fear hurricanes, not realizing that hurricanes also spawn tornados.
|
|

02-24-2009, 05:14 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Within the captured territory of the Federal Occupying Force.
1,414 posts, read 236,004 times
Reputation: 321
|
|
I voted on economic trouble being more dangerous. I wonder why all of the "militia movements" are so creepily quiet during all of this 
|
|

02-24-2009, 05:14 PM
|
|
Senior Member
Status:
"Proof Read, Who's Got Time To Proof Read?"
(set 7 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
7,540 posts, read 1,748,102 times
Reputation: 1947
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nightbird47
And remember that terrorism and bombings do not have to be external. When you can blame a guy half way across the world its one thing, but when its someone out there who could be readying the next bomb and nobody will tell its quite different. No reason to think that this would not be a part.
|
Precisely.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|

02-24-2009, 05:14 PM
|
|
Not a member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Western Hoosierland
18,264 posts, read 2,537,474 times
Reputation: 5943
|
|
|
I believe the economic crash is more important than Islamic Terrorism
|
|