Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-06-2009, 03:56 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,642 posts, read 26,374,838 times
Reputation: 12648

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by scuba steve View Post
I agree completely. On one hand, it'd be a horrible idea to start that party but on the other hand, it's not like they'd win an election anyway.

Probably not, but we would definitely cast the deciding votes.

Spend all the money you like on your campaigns. Have your conventions. Make your speeches. When it's all over, we'll decide who runs the country. The Republicans went luke warm on us and look what happened. Any large minority can control closely contested elections. When the Democratic party falls out of favor with blacks, they're done. Last time around they deliberately limited their contest to a female and a Halfrican American. They didn't do that because those were the two best candidates. The base demanded it and when they got it, they showed up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-06-2009, 03:57 PM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,100 posts, read 39,258,323 times
Reputation: 4937
Quote:
Originally Posted by afoigrokerkok View Post
Separation of church and state
There is no such language in the Constitution.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2009, 03:59 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,459,826 times
Reputation: 4586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatday View Post
There is no such language in the Constitution.
No, but it does say that the government cannot condone any one religion. I understand that creating a party would not be unconstitutional, but if the party actually started assuming offices, there could be a major conflict of interest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2009, 04:01 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,811,747 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Probably not, but we would definitely cast the deciding votes.

Spend all the money you like on your campaigns. Have your conventions. Make your speeches. When it's all over, we'll decide who runs the country. The Republicans went luke warm on us and look what happened. Any large minority can control closely contested elections. When the Democratic party falls out of favor with blacks, they're done. Last time around they deliberately limited their contest to a female and a Halfrican American. They didn't do that because those were the two best candidates. The base demanded it and when they got it, they showed up.
So a good southern Evangelical Christian candidate will clean up that minority mess you refer to, right?

Huckabee didn't win and for good reason!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2009, 04:02 PM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,100 posts, read 39,258,323 times
Reputation: 4937
Quote:
Originally Posted by afoigrokerkok View Post
No, but it does say that the government cannot condone any one religion. I understand that creating a party would not be unconstitutional, but if the party actually started assuming offices, there could be a major conflict of interest.
No, the language is "establish a religion". That is not what would happen

BTW, did you know the Congress does not meet on Jewish Holidays?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2009, 04:06 PM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,319,728 times
Reputation: 2337
Quote:
Originally Posted by scuba steve View Post
I agree completely. On one hand, it'd be a horrible idea to start that party but on the other hand, it's not like they'd win an election anyway.
Any person not registered in the Christian Party would by definition fall into any of the opposing parties of S_A_T_A_N!

Since the Christian Party would most likely be fear-based and fear-driven, it would derive all of its power from its opponents.

Last edited by ergohead; 05-06-2009 at 04:18 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2009, 04:09 PM
 
Location: In the Heartland of Hooterville!
24 posts, read 83,051 times
Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by ergohead View Post
Then all issues could be solved with the question:

OOps, I backspaced too far...anyway I just wanted to say that the "Constitution Party" has deep rooted beliefs in religion, specifically Christianity....thats one reason I think they get nowhere, they want to mix too much govt.' with religion. (Now I would agree that this is already being done...but the 2 top parties don't actually campaign on it!)

Same reaon I believe the "Libertarian Party" will get nowhere, because they believe in legalizing marijuana...it would be interesting to see what these 2 parties coud do if they toned down some of their platform ideas!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2009, 04:12 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,459,826 times
Reputation: 4586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatday View Post
No, the language is "establish a religion". That is not what would happen

BTW, did you know the Congress does not meet on Jewish Holidays?
Yes it cannot establish a religion for the country. So, if the Christian party took office, don't you think it would be likely to attempt to establish Christianity as a national religion?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2009, 04:13 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,642 posts, read 26,374,838 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Not much difference between the two. Its debatable whether Christians would be more violent, more busy... probably, a lot more factions to deal with.

Not really sure I understand your assertion. As is, Muslims are at war with other Muslims in various parts of the world. But with the exception of N. Ireland, little voilence has taken place between "Christians" over religious differences. Perhaps you could provide an example of that to which you are referring.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2009, 04:14 PM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,100 posts, read 39,258,323 times
Reputation: 4937
Quote:
Originally Posted by afoigrokerkok View Post
Yes it cannot establish a religion for the country. So, if the Christian party took office, don't you think it would be likely to attempt to establish Christianity as a national religion?
No.

And the point also is - I support having numerous political parties - not just religious ones!

I am opposed to the two party system - how about you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top