Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Conspiracy now? Wiggle, wiggle. Sorry, that was an assumption on my part. My bad..... Wiggle, wiggle
No wiggle, just truth as the evidence shows. Report the post - but you can stuff your attempt at moderation - and yeah, your conspiracy theory was blown to bits, since I haven't bothered to change either picture.
Quote:
Most of what you post makes no sense. Why would I think this would be any different?
All rights reserved. Users may download and print extracts of content from this website for their own personal and non-commercial use only. Republication or redistribution of Thomson Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters and its logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of the Thomson Reuters group of companies around the world.
Thomson Reuters journalists are subject to an Editorial Handbook which requires fair presentation and disclosure of relevant interests.
Hmmm....
Quote:
Originally Posted by walidm
If you are interested in creating hypertext links to this Site, please contact us at:
New York Post
Attn: Online Department
1211 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036
Email: contact us here
However, before doing so, in establishing hypertext links, you must not represent in any way, expressly or by implication, that you have received the endorsement, sponsorship or support of this Site or NYP, including its respective employees, agents, directors, officers and shareholders.
Either way, I wouldn't want something like that done to a picture of one of my kids. How gross.
Really, I think the children of politicians should be off limits - that includes their pictures.
I agree unless they haul their kids around during their political campaign. That includes any politician. Again I'm not fond of the picture, but this is, supposedly, America, bad taste and all...
Hey, do you think that democrat cow who doctored the picture got permission to do that?
Just curious?
Parody and satire reconfigurations of an expression (e.g., written text, image etc.) are treated differently under copyright law than actual reproductions, which unauthorized constitute copyright infringement. Just thought you'd want to know.
Then you should go ask that vile, putrid, hogwashish, democrat b*tch.
Since you two have taken up the task of CRed-pic-police, you should go see if she did get permission. Of course, she's a democrat targeting Palin and her DS baby, so that probably wouldn't fly.
Now back to the topic of this thread;
The democrats targeting Palin's DS baby in a scurrilous attack.
Parody and satire reconfigurations of an expression (e.g., written text, image etc.) are treated differently under copyright law than actual reproductions, which unauthorized constitute copyright infringement. Just thought you'd want to know.
Thank you. I strive to learn something new every day. Today has been a boon!
I agree unless they haul their kids around during their political campaign.
I guess that would apply to obama's girls as well.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
