Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-30-2009, 10:59 PM
 
4,459 posts, read 4,217,802 times
Reputation: 648

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by LogicWings View Post
Looks like Laura Bush had 15 and the Most Fashionable Woman in the World has 22.
Who cares....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-30-2009, 11:00 PM
 
539 posts, read 701,192 times
Reputation: 119
When the list of Laura Bush staff was made public in the Washington Post, the Democrats and Liberals went bonkers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2009, 11:02 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,717,565 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by LogicWings View Post
When the list of Laura Bush staff was made public in the Washington Post, the Democrats and Liberals went bonkers.
So will you agree that it's just as irrational to go "bonkers" over Michelle Obama's staff?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2009, 11:03 PM
 
7,380 posts, read 15,696,663 times
Reputation: 4975
i don't recall going bonkers, or even hearing about it.

i guess that's cause i'm a leftist, not a liberal or a dem?

but seriously, this "you did it so we did it so you did it so we did it so you did it so we did it" 5th grade logic nonsense is getting VERY old.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2009, 11:03 PM
 
539 posts, read 701,192 times
Reputation: 119
"Nancy Reagan had a staff of at least 35."

Was there a Great Recession during that administration?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2009, 11:04 PM
 
7,380 posts, read 15,696,663 times
Reputation: 4975
so she was allowed to waste taxpayer money (according to your logic) because the economy was good?

while the reagan administration was running up record deficits?

face it, you only hold things against the obamas because they're the obamas. it's massively hypocritical. and sort of pathetic.

i'm all for criticizing the president's policies if you disagree with them, but as i've said in other threads, outright lying, complaining about things that are standard practice, trying to make every little detail of the obamas' lives into a huge issue, and hugely hyperbolizing (senior citizen euthanasia anyone?) just makes your side look nuts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2009, 11:04 PM
 
539 posts, read 701,192 times
Reputation: 119
"So will you agree that it's just as irrational to go "bonkers" over Michelle Obama's staff?"

No one here going bonkers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2009, 11:06 PM
 
539 posts, read 701,192 times
Reputation: 119
and the current First Lady is not wasting taxpayer money?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2009, 11:08 PM
 
7,380 posts, read 15,696,663 times
Reputation: 4975
was nancy reagan wasting taxpayer money?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2009, 11:10 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,717,565 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by LogicWings View Post
"Nancy Reagan had a staff of at least 35."

Was there a Great Recession during that administration?
Oh just stop, will you?

But since you brought it up, there was, in fact, a significant recession in the early 1980s.

By the way, I think most people find blind partisanship to be very unappealing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:44 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top