Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-24-2009, 07:57 AM
 
Location: North Las Vegas
1,125 posts, read 1,592,434 times
Reputation: 929

Advertisements

Guys, trying to get these guys to actually believe the Global Warming is not happening will be next to impossible. I mean after all these are the same folks who elected a man based on nothing more than the mottoes "Change" and "Yes We Can" (I never once got an answer besides F*#@ Off when I asked Obama supporters yes you can what?)

They have their mindset locked in, nothing is going to change it short of an ice age.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-24-2009, 09:04 AM
 
Location: Washington DC
5,922 posts, read 8,073,844 times
Reputation: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonyandclaire89 View Post
Professor Lindzen is a dynamical meteorologist with interests in the broad topics of climate, planetary waves, monsoon meteorology, planetary atmospheres, and hydrodynamic instability. His research involves studies of the role of the tropics in mid-latitude weather and global heat transport, the moisture budget and its role in global change, the origins of ice ages, seasonal effects in atmospheric transport, stratospheric waves, and the observational determination of climate sensitivity. He has made major contributions to the development of the current theory for the Hadley Circulation, which dominates the atmospheric transport of heat and momentum from the tropics to higher latitudes, and has advanced the understanding of the role of small scale gravity waves in producing the reversal of global temperature gradients at the mesopause.

He pioneered the study of how ozone photochemistry, radiative transfer and dynamics interact with each other. He is currently studying the ways in which unstable eddies determine the pole to equator temperature difference, and the nonlinear equilibration of baroclinic instability and the contribution of such instabilities to global heat transport. In the past few years, he has been studying the influence of temperature on cumulus convection and its role in generating cirrus decks. The results so far strongly suggest a powerful negative feedback in climate.

He has developed models for the Earth's climate with specific concern for the stability of the ice caps, the sensitivity to increases in CO2, the origin of the 100,000 year cycle in glaciation, and the maintenance of regional variations in climate.

Prof. Lindzen is a recipient of the AMS's Meisinger, and Charney Awards, and the AGU's Macelwane Medal. He is a member of the National Academy of Sciences, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and a Fellow of the AAAS. (Ph.D., '64, S.M., '61, A.B., '60, Harvard University)

http://alumweb.mit.edu/clubs/sw-flor...k_08_03_24.pdf
Interesting lay level presentation by Lindzen. In summary he says global warming is real, it's happening, anthropogenic sources are important, but the magnitude of climate change caused by an increase in greenhouse gases is less than that estimated by the other equally qualified scientists who work in the field. Prof Lindzen may well be right. But that begs the question.....

What are the implications if from a policy standpoint if we do nothing to arrest the exponential increase in greenhouse gas emmissions?

We get to the same point in environmental damage predicted by the other scientists, but it take longer.....

If this is the best, and I think it is, case the climate change deniers can put forward, I think it's time to move forward with Waxman Markey.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2009, 09:10 AM
 
Location: Washington DC
5,922 posts, read 8,073,844 times
Reputation: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
I wish I could remain alive and healthy for the next couple of centuries just so I could observe what actually happens. That would be really interesting.

BTW - Why did the climate warm up between 800 and 1200 AD and then cool off so much during the 1200's to the 1500's?
Global climate didn't warm between 800 and 1200 AD.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2009, 09:13 AM
 
Location: Marietta, GA
7,887 posts, read 17,206,792 times
Reputation: 3706
Excellent! Thank you for sharing. My favorite slide is the one that explains Gore's (and many people's) motives:

"Why is Gore doing this?

There are probably many reasons, but one is fairly clear. Global warming is about observations of small warming coupled with poorly supported claims about the future. The proposed actions will be costly in both economic and human terms. Actions that will actually stabilize CO2 at levels held to be acceptable will, in effect, return us to the pre-industrial condition. Such harmful actions can only be promoted in an atmosphere of crisis. You are, therefore, led to believe that disasters, that occur all the time, are now due to human induced global warming. This involves dishonesty at a very high level."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2009, 09:18 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,990,690 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Global climate didn't warm between 800 and 1200 AD.
You do realize the Earth has been much, much hotter in the past, with no people to blame? What caused it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2009, 09:44 AM
 
Location: Washington DC
5,922 posts, read 8,073,844 times
Reputation: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
You do realize the Earth has been much, much hotter in the past, with no people to blame? What caused it?
Many things affect climate, but a major driver of what's happening now is anthropogenic. There are natural causes for fires and anthropogenic causes of fire. We still find it beneficial to fight fires.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2009, 09:47 AM
 
7,359 posts, read 10,287,401 times
Reputation: 1893
Quote:
Originally Posted by neil0311 View Post
Excellent! Thank you for sharing. My favorite slide is the one that explains Gore's (and many people's) motives:

"Why is Gore doing this?

There are probably many reasons, but one is fairly clear. Global warming is about observations of small warming coupled with poorly supported claims about the future. The proposed actions will be costly in both economic and human terms. Actions that will actually stabilize CO2 at levels held to be acceptable will, in effect, return us to the pre-industrial condition. Such harmful actions can only be promoted in an atmosphere of crisis. You are, therefore, led to believe that disasters, that occur all the time, are now due to human induced global warming. This involves dishonesty at a very high level."

Interesting. Is Gore also responsible for the findings of EVERY SINGLE MAJOR SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTION in the world? Is the WHOLE WORLD "dishonest"?

This guy's "theories" have already been disproved. But he's the climate change skeptics' favorite boy. No surprise there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2009, 09:50 AM
 
30,087 posts, read 18,701,618 times
Reputation: 20908
Quote:
Originally Posted by rlchurch View Post
Many things affect climate, but a major driver of what's happening now is anthropogenic. There are natural causes for fires and anthropogenic causes of fire. We still find it beneficial to fight fires.

How do you know? The fact is.................you don't. No one knows for sure. Unless there is strong evidence to support that contention, it is simply conjecture and not fact. Let's act upon proven facts rather than presumptions and fears. Global warming now reminds me of a Salem witch hunt- fear mongers blaming an entity with no truth, and unfortunately acting upon those fears.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2009, 09:57 AM
 
7,359 posts, read 10,287,401 times
Reputation: 1893
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
How do you know? The fact is.................you don't. No one knows for sure. Unless there is strong evidence to support that contention, it is simply conjecture and not fact. Let's act upon proven facts rather than presumptions and fears. Global warming now reminds me of a Salem witch hunt- fear mongers blaming an entity with no truth, and unfortunately acting upon those fears.
Simply not true. What in the world makes you think that there's isn't "strong evidence"??? Do you seriously believe that most of the world's climate scientists are simply "conjecturing"???? Absurd.

I find it absolutely hilarious that posters on an internet forum think they know more than climate scientists about climate change. As though they've discovered some scientific secret nobody else knows about.

The people who think that there's no "evidence" for climate change are like the "birthers": No matter how much "evidence" is presented, it's never enough. And the reason it's never enough is because it's actually not about "evidence." It's about an ideological resistance to anything that even remotely challenges their world view.

How to Talk to a Climate Skeptic: Responses to the most common skeptical arguments on global warming | A Grist Special Series | Grist
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2009, 10:01 AM
 
Location: Marietta, GA
7,887 posts, read 17,206,792 times
Reputation: 3706
Quote:
Originally Posted by MovingForward View Post
Interesting. Is Gore also responsible for the findings of EVERY SINGLE MAJOR SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTION in the world? Is the WHOLE WORLD "dishonest"?

This guy's "theories" have already been disproved. But he's the climate change skeptics' favorite boy. No surprise there.
If you noticed, I said Gore's and "many people's" motives. Not saying Gore is responsible or a spokesman for anyone. He is just a very vocal and influential proponent of this politicized theory.

As you saw by the slides, your ridiculous claim that so-called global warming, aka climate change, is a universally held theory in not true. "The whole world" is not dishonest because the "whole world" does not support or believe what Al Gore and others believe.

You need to get out of your echo chamber once in a while.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top