Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yes, Chicago is now and was in the past, one of the worst choices to host foreign visitors.
You really don't realize how laughable your position is, do you?
It's like saying "OMG, they want to hold a sporting event in Denver! Do you realize how high the background radiation is? It's terribly unsafe! People get cancer there!"
Yes, Denver has higher background radiation, and it causes health effects. But the difference is in the noise, almost.
The crime in Chicago might be higher than in some other large cities in the US, but it's not appreciably different than other cities, and it's much, much better than other cities on the short list.
Seriously. Give it up. Don't keep defending your silly position.
I used to fly into O'hare and wondered every single time if I would come out of that hell hole alive.
Any place would be better then Chicago.
I thought we wanted people to enjoy themselves when they come to America for the Olympics, Chicago would not be a wise choice.
Far to many other towns that would be better and not scam people out of there money like the Chicago Obama connections would.
See, Pommy's Mommy! Sunny Days agrees with you! You're way, way off track.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
