Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-04-2009, 08:44 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,717,466 times
Reputation: 27720

Advertisements

Politics has entered AARP. Swaying members to vote a certain way has corrupted them.
Happens to all good organizations after they grow big enough to have influence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-04-2009, 08:47 AM
 
Location: Sacramento
14,044 posts, read 27,293,247 times
Reputation: 7373
Quote:
Originally Posted by nicet4 View Post
I dropped my membership six months ago. Wrote a letter and let them know why.
Same here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2009, 08:50 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,642,213 times
Reputation: 24780
Default McCain calls on seniors to 'cut up their AARP cards'

Everybody already knows that the insurance companies are more concerned with seniors' health issues than the AARP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2009, 09:37 AM
 
7,138 posts, read 14,671,322 times
Reputation: 2397
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
Everybody already knows that the insurance companies are more concerned with seniors' health issues than the AARP.

AARP will jump into bed with anyone. They are merely snuggling up to Big Government at this time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2009, 12:01 PM
 
Location: S.E. US
13,163 posts, read 1,746,600 times
Reputation: 5135
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
The Medicare cuts are primarily in the Advantage plan process. The Govt pays subsidies to private insurers to offer plans that meet a coverage level at least as comprehensive as Medicare. Many companies take advantage of that. The govt subsidy over compensates the ins. co. for the plan Medicare eligible people choose. Some, actually most, of those ins. cos. keep the subsidy and the Soc Sec recipient's $96/mnth. Making huge profits from the venture. Some of those ins. cos. are a little more responsible, and return the $96 to the Soc Sec recipient, yet still makes a large profit on the policy. Basically, it is well know that there are huge amounts of over payments to the ins. cos. That is where the bulk of the proposed Medicare cuts are to occur. Why do you think the ins. cos. are so opposed to reform in this area? Duh! Why do you think the Repubs, not just McCain, are so opposed to reform in this area? Duh! When you consider the number of people Medicare eligible, I would not be surprised if 400-500 billion could be cut out of just this portion of Medicare. And these cuts done without any degradation of the coverage.
Not every area has the same companies offering Advantage Plans, and if these subsidies are cut, then millions of seniors will be left with nothing but straight Medicare, which is very expensive if any kind of medical care is needed. Seniors pay an additional premium for their Advantage Plans, above and beyond the $96/month that is deducted from their SS check. For 2010, most will end up paying close to a total of $200 per month in premiums. Even at that there are areas where there is no choice of plans. Some insurance companies have already pulled out of regions they previously covered. IF there is no insurance company to offer an Advantage Plan, and there are no doctors that will accept Medicare patients, how do you figure that these cuts will not result in degradation of the coverage? That's faulty reasoning, or reasoning based on incomplete understanding of what is actually happening.

Obama has said he wants to ELIMINATE all Advantage Plans. So, what will be left? Plain Medicare, the public option, or AARP Supplemental insurance which will have no competition and typically costs $100-$200 more in premiums. That's why AARP is on board with Obamacare. It's AARP that stands to gain by forcing more people into their supplemental plans, and the Government stands to gain by having them move to a public option. You talk as though all seniors are rolling in bundles of money when in fact the bulk of them have just their social security to fall back on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2009, 04:37 PM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,905,976 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by southward bound View Post
Not every area has the same companies offering Advantage Plans, and if these subsidies are cut, then millions of seniors will be left with nothing but straight Medicare, which is very expensive if any kind of medical care is needed. Seniors pay an additional premium for their Advantage Plans, above and beyond the $96/month that is deducted from their SS check. For 2010, most will end up paying close to a total of $200 per month in premiums. Even at that there are areas where there is no choice of plans. Some insurance companies have already pulled out of regions they previously covered. IF there is no insurance company to offer an Advantage Plan, and there are no doctors that will accept Medicare patients, how do you figure that these cuts will not result in degradation of the coverage? That's faulty reasoning, or reasoning based on incomplete understanding of what is actually happening.

Obama has said he wants to ELIMINATE all Advantage Plans. So, what will be left? Plain Medicare, the public option, or AARP Supplemental insurance which will have no competition and typically costs $100-$200 more in premiums. That's why AARP is on board with Obamacare. It's AARP that stands to gain by forcing more people into their supplemental plans, and the Government stands to gain by having them move to a public option. You talk as though all seniors are rolling in bundles of money when in fact the bulk of them have just their social security to fall back on.
Please check facts prior to saying things like this. Senior pay nothing additional for Advantage plans. There are extended coverage plans for drug needs, if the senior has those needs. Those will not change. It is very doubtful Advantage plans will go away, there is way too much profit available to private ins. cos. for that to happen. The Advantage plans are only slightly better than basic Medicare and very doubtful Doctors will not accept Medicare. Obama has stated the excessive subsidies need to be eliminated, and they do, but not Advantage plans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2009, 04:45 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,364,091 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcsldcd View Post
This is the one many of my friends have went after dropping AARP. They said they were very happy with it.

American Seniors Association
I went there right after that fat CEO came out in favor of government run healthcare and it became very obvious that they are there for money alone for their programs. I much prefer the ASA since they ask for money but don't try to sell anything other than their support for seniors.

I had been a member of AARP for nearly 25 years but it wasn't hard to cut our ties.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2009, 04:46 PM
 
563 posts, read 519,993 times
Reputation: 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by nicet4 View Post
I dropped my membership six months ago. Wrote a letter and let them know why.
They probably couldn't care less which is what is wrong with a lot of the big businesses today. I have a problem with Regions Bank and said when they are done investigating their mistake to cut me a cashiers check for whatever is in there. They couldn't care less.

My Aunt was in there and has a $300,000 CD in that bank and said to close it out. They were like monkeys with no tails on. How do you explain that one to the President of the Bank?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2009, 04:49 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,364,091 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
The Medicare cuts are primarily in the Advantage plan process. The Govt pays subsidies to private insurers to offer plans that meet a coverage level at least as comprehensive as Medicare. Many companies take advantage of that. The govt subsidy over compensates the ins. co. for the plan Medicare eligible people choose. Some, actually most, of those ins. cos. keep the subsidy and the Soc Sec recipient's $96/mnth. Making huge profits from the venture. Some of those ins. cos. are a little more responsible, and return the $96 to the Soc Sec recipient, yet still makes a large profit on the policy. Basically, it is well know that there are huge amounts of over payments to the ins. cos. That is where the bulk of the proposed Medicare cuts are to occur. Why do you think the ins. cos. are so opposed to reform in this area? Duh! Why do you think the Repubs, not just McCain, are so opposed to reform in this area? Duh! When you consider the number of people Medicare eligible, I would not be surprised if 400-500 billion could be cut out of just this portion of Medicare. And these cuts done without any degradation of the coverage.
bob, I think that $500 billion is to be cut over a 10 year period not all one year. How long have you been on Medicare? I have been for 12 years and I see how little they allow to be paid for some things and how much for some others. I don't think the bureaucrats that run it know much about medicine or hospitals but they do manage to do what they do, inflate the cost of health care, very well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2009, 04:50 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,364,091 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
Everybody already knows that the insurance companies are more concerned with seniors' health issues than the AARP.
But AARP has become an insurance company over the last few years so how do you separate them from the companies?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:31 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top